Posted on 06/02/2014 6:09:52 AM PDT by Bratch
Southern Baptists will be heading for Baltimore in just a few days, and the annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention is to be held in a city that has not hosted the convention since 1940. This time, Baptists attending the meeting will face an issue that would not have been imaginable just a few years ago, much less in 1940 — a congregation that affirms same-sex relationships.
Just days before the convention, news broke that a congregation in suburban Los Angeles has decided to affirm same-sex sexuality and relationships. In an hour-long video posted on the Internet, Pastor Danny Cortez explains his personal change of mind and position on the issue of homosexuality and same-sex relationships. He also addressed the same issues in a letter posted at Patheos.com.
In the letter, Cortez describes a sunny day at the beach in August of 2013 when “I realized I no longer believed in the traditional teachings regarding homosexuality.”
Shortly thereafter, he told his 15-year-old son that he “no longer believed what he used to believe.” His son responded with an even more direct word to his father: “Dad, I’m gay.” As Cortez writes, “My heart skipped a beat and I turned towards him and we gave one another the biggest and longest hug as we cried. And all I could tell him was that I loved him so much and that I accepted him just as he is.”
According to the pastor, events then came rather quickly. On February 7, 2014, his son, Drew, posted a “coming out video” on YouTube. Two days later, the pastor told his church about his new position on the issue (also posted on the Internet). In his message to the New Heart Community Church congregation, Cortez admitted that his “new position” represented a “radical shift” that put him into conflict with both the position of the church and the convictions of the denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention. He acknowledged that his change of heart on the issue of homosexuality put him at odds with the SBC’s confession of faith, the Baptist Faith & Message.
In his letter, the pastor said that his aim was to see the congregation “allow for grace in the midst of disagreement.” To his regret, he said, many in the church were not pleased and the church had to consider whether to terminate the pastor. After voting on March 9 to prolong the time of consideration and prayer, the church voted on May 18 not to dismiss the pastor and “to instead become a Third Way church.”
Cortez cited Vineyard pastor Ken Wilson’s book, released earlier this year,A Letter to My Congregation. Wilson, who serves a Vineyard church in Ann Arbor, Michigan, describes his book as “an evangelical pastor’s path to embracing people who are gay, lesbian, and transgender in the company of Jesus.” Wilson argues that, even as he has come to affirm same-sex behaviors and relationships, the issue need not divide congregations or Christians.
Pastor Cortez cited Wilson’s argument as foundational to the position he and his church are now taking — “agree to disagree and not cast judgment on one another.”
But, there is no third way. A church will either believe and teach that same-sex behaviors and relationships are sinful, or it will affirm them. Eventually, every congregation in America will make a public declaration of its position on this issue. It is just a matter of time (and for most churches, not much time) before every congregation in the nation faces this test.
The impossibility of a “third way” is made clear in Pastor Cortez’s own letter.
In one paragraph, he writes:
“So now, we will accept the LGBT community even though they may be in a relationship. We will choose to remain the body of Christ and not cast judgement. We will work towards graceful dialogue in the midst of theological differences. We wee that this is possible in the same way that our church holds different positions on the issue of divorce and remarriage. In this issue we are able to not cast judgement in our disagreement.”
But in the very next paragraph, he writes:
“Unfortunately, many who voted to remain traditional will now separate from us in a couple of weeks. We are in the period of reconciliation and forgiveness. Please pray for us in this. Then on June 8, we will formally peacefully separate, restate our love for one another, and bless each other as we part ways. It has been a very tiring and difficult process.”
In two successive paragraphs the pastor refutes himself. His church is notgoing to take a middle ground. He states clearly that “we will accept the LGBT community even though they may be in a relationship.” And his church did not unanimously “agree to disagree,” for a significant portion of the church is leaving on June 8, just 48 hours before the Southern Baptist Convention convenes in Baltimore. Many “who voted to remain traditional” are now forced by conviction to leave the church.
Why? Because there is no “third way.” The New Heart Community Church has voted to “accept the LGBT community even though they may be in a relationship.” Even if it is claimed that some continuing members of the church are in disagreement with the new policy and position, they will be members of a church that operates under that new policy. At the very least, their decision to remain in the congregation is a decision to stay within a church that affirms same-sex behaviors and relationships. That is not a middle position. It is not a “third way.”
For some time now, it has been increasingly clear that every congregation in this nation will be forced to declare itself openly on this issue. That moment of decision and public declaration will come to every Christian believer, individually. There will be no place to hide, and no place safe from eventual interrogation. The question will be asked, an invitation will be extended, a matter of policy must be decided, and there will be no refuge.
There is no third way on this issue. Several years ago, I made that argument and was assailed by many on the left as being “reductionistically binary.” But, the issue is binary. A church will recognize same-sex relationships, or it will not. A congregation will teach a biblical position on the sinfulness of same-sex acts, or it will affirm same-sex behaviors as morally acceptable. Ministers will perform same-sex ceremonies, or they will not.
Interestingly, a recent point of agreement on this essential point has come from an unexpected source. Tony Jones, long known as a leader in the “emerging church” has written that there is no “third way” on same-sex marriage. As Jones notes, denominations may study the issue for some time, but eventually it will take a vote. At that point, it will either allow for same-sex marriage, or not.
In his words:
“And the same goes for an individual congregation. At some point, every congregation in America will decide either, YES, same-sex marriages will take place in our sanctuary, performed by our clergy; or NO, same-sex marriages will not take place in our sanctuary, performed by our clergy. There is no third way on that. A church either allows same-sex marriages, or it doesn’t.”
Tony Jones and I stand on opposite sides of this issue, but on the impossibility of a “third way” we are in absolute agreement. Conservative evangelicals have understood this for some time. It is interesting that those on the left now understand the issue in the same “binary” terms. There is no middle position.
Once again, Tony Jones gets right to the essential point:
“What I’m saying is that a church or an organization can study the issue in theory, and they can even do so for years. But this isn’t really a ‘third way’ or a ‘middle ground.’ Instead, it is a process. And at some point, that process has to end and practices have to be implemented. At that point, there’s no third way. You either affirm marriage equality in your practices, or you do not.”
Actually, as we have seen, Pastor Cortez makes the same point. The practice of his congregation is now to accept openly-gay members and members in openly-gay relationships. That does not allow for any middle ground, and that is why his church faces an exodus of members next Sunday.
Now, the Southern Baptist Convention also faces a moment of unavoidable decision. A church related to the Convention has officially adopted a gay-affirming position. The Baptist Faith & Message, the denomination’s confession of faith, states that homosexuality is immoral and that marriage is “the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime.”
Furthermore, the Convention’s constitution states explicitly that any congregation that endorses homosexual behavior is “not in cooperation with the Convention,” and thus excluded from its membership.
There is nothing but heartbreak in this situation. Here we face a church that has rejected the clear teachings of Scripture, the affirmations of its confession of faith, and two millennia of Christian moral wisdom and teaching. But the Convention also faces a test of its own resolve and convictional courage.
I am confident that the Southern Baptist Convention will act in accordance with its own convictions, confession of faith, and constitution when messengers to the Convention gather next week in Baltimore. But every single evangelical congregation, denomination, mission agency, school, and institution had better be ready to face the same challenge, for it will come quickly, and often from an unexpected source. Once it comes, there is no middle ground, and no “third way.”
Sooner or later — and probably sooner — the answer of every church and Christian will be either yes or no.
Agree 100%. Very well said.
I think...and have discussed this with my wife...that this is the beginning of an outright attempt to outlaw Christianity. I know quite a few FReepers agree.
First, you force denominations to debate and vote on the issue. If they are weak and not standing on Scripture, they fold under the pressure to accept sin. If they are standing on the inerrant Word of God, they will reject sin. At this point those who wish destruction upon the Church bring the secular legal system into play. An attempt (perhaps several attempts) will be made to paint the Christian Church as a ‘band of hateful bigots’ that should not be allowed to continue unless they bow to the “right way to believe”.
I think that within the next 10 years, perhaps less, we may see the Church forced underground. Those who do not accept homosexuality will be persecuted, possibly imprisoned, and perhaps even killed for their beliefs.
If there’s any good to take away from this. it is the fact that in the end, no matter how hard the world (and Satan) fights, God wins. And...so do those who stand firm in their beliefs.
“Even so, come, Lord Jesus.”
Cortez had a difficult choice: to stay true to traditional Christian beliefs, or to stay on good terms with his son. He chose his son. That was his choice. However, he does not have the right to impose his choice on his congregation. He should have stepped down as pastor.
Yep, fully agree that this is what is happening.
When you see these things come to pass, look up, for your redemption is nigh.
I agree
Jimmy Carter. . .now that’s a class act for you :)
“increasingly rigid in theology” If the Bible said it. . .no further questions.
We could have a so called SBC “separation of the sheep and the goats” before the Rapture.
More and more, I'm coming to agree with you. Up here in the People's Marxist Republic of Illinois, we're now officially cursed with queer marriage.
Perfect.
Disgusting apostates.
Pastor has paradigm shift, son tells him “I’m a homosexual offender”...errr...uh...GAY...yea, that’s the ticket...and a Lifetime Movie hug ensues. Everyone on the Planet of Women rises as one and shouts “hallelujah!”
Meanwhile, a small band of believers quietly think to themselves, “Let God be true and every man a liar.”
Good point. Doesn’t quite work out, does it? Delusion enables one to MAKE it work somehow, though.
You know the narrative wordage is interesting...like out of some third rate novel...as in “ she looked at me earnestly, her gorgeous blond tresses catching the sunlight and her blue eyes glowing like inner lit aquamarines...and MY HEART SKIPPED A BEAT as she held my hand and softly spoke...”I love you! Now can you pass the horse radish?”
Americans need to get their heads out of their “Utopias happily ever after” narratives, better known as their rear ends!
It's all predestined. Nobody has to decide anything.
This applies to many other issue facing the Church as well.
By the way, why the heck is this group having their convention in the heart of Sissy-Mary-Land, one of the capitals of sodomy?
But where does Cortez stand on allowing women to preach?
And those exceptions are extremely specific, and not a license.
Bingo. Some of the most obnoxious "Christians" I have encountered are the parents of gays who want to change the church to be more "inclusive", as if we were never taught, "Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it." (Matt. 7:13-14)
However, IMHO the Protestant churches in the US have (since the so-called Sexual Revolution of the 1960s) fallen down terribly in the duty to teach marriage from the pulpit, to demand marriage classes before marrying people, and to exercise opprobrium when couples living together in sin or parading their relationships before one partner is divorced in front of the children. I have seen all these behaviors ignored or excused, especially when one or both of the "public sinners" is a popular parishioner, a Board member, a missionary or a big donor.
One of the outrages of the Episcopalian's "gay bishop" ordination in 2003 was that at that time, the ECUSA was still inquiring about the sex lives of engaged couples, and made a few of my divorced-but-engaged-again friends step down from official parish posts until the matter was resolved by marriage. The hypocrisy on that end was stunning. But since then, it seems that "anything goes" in many of the formerly mainstream denominations.
The Baptists should defrock this renegade pastor.
Long overdue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.