“You make a much too simplistic argument to rationalize why there ARE more Roman Catholics converting to the Evangelical Protestant side that the reverse.”
I made no such argument at all. Can Protestants actually read? I made no argument about “ why there ARE more Roman Catholics converting to the Evangelical Protestant side that the reverse.”
Can you tell the difference between a comment about “few “notable” Catholics” and “why there ARE more Roman Catholics converting to the Evangelical Protestant side that the reverse”? Can you?
Yet you said:
No. The “so what” is that these Protestant ministers know their Protestant faiths (despite other Protestants claiming otherwise) and they risk everything to become Catholics while there are few “notable” Catholics who become Protestants and those who do are either breaking a vow or are lay people who seem terribly catechized in the Catholic faith.
Your contention is that "notable" Catholics who convert to Protestantism are doing so by "breaking a vow" or they were "terribly catechized". You have made several other comments on this thread that condemns Protestantism as "adultery" and, by definition, all Protestants. I know what you meant and I have no desire to play your word games.