Yet you said:
No. The “so what” is that these Protestant ministers know their Protestant faiths (despite other Protestants claiming otherwise) and they risk everything to become Catholics while there are few “notable” Catholics who become Protestants and those who do are either breaking a vow or are lay people who seem terribly catechized in the Catholic faith.
Your contention is that "notable" Catholics who convert to Protestantism are doing so by "breaking a vow" or they were "terribly catechized". You have made several other comments on this thread that condemns Protestantism as "adultery" and, by definition, all Protestants. I know what you meant and I have no desire to play your word games.
“Your contention is that “notable” Catholics who convert to Protestantism are doing so by “breaking a vow” or they were “terribly catechized”.”
That is not my contention nor is it an argument. It is simply a statement of fact.
“You have made several other comments on this thread that condemns Protestantism as “adultery” and, by definition, all Protestants.”
False. I made no statement “by definition”, about “all Protestants.” I did make a statement - more than one - about the adulterous nature of the collection of heresies known as Protestantism.
“I know what you meant and I have no desire to play your word games.”
I don’t play word games. I simply post the truth.