To: marshmallow
Why aren’t Catholics considered “evangelicals”? How do they spread The Gospel if they don’t evangelize?
3 posted on
05/08/2014 6:24:10 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Texas Eagle
Why aren’t Catholics considered “evangelicals”? How do they spread The Gospel if they don’t evangelize? That all depends on how you (and they) define "The Gospel".
4 posted on
05/08/2014 6:31:00 AM PDT by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
To: Texas Eagle
I listen to Evangelical preachers, and to my Catholic priests on Sunday, and I find almost no difference in the substance of what is being preached.
To: Texas Eagle
Evangelical does not mean evangelism. It means people of the book.
Originally it was used by Reformers to self identify themselves. Today it's usage is so mushy that it really has little practical meaning.
6 posted on
05/08/2014 6:39:21 AM PDT by
Gamecock
(The covenant is a stunning blend of law and love. (TK))
To: Texas Eagle
Why aren’t Catholics considered “evangelicals”? They reject sola scriptura, which is one of the major tenants of evangelicalism.
12 posted on
05/08/2014 9:38:05 AM PDT by
dartuser
To: Texas Eagle
It’s just terms we use to classify people.
13 posted on
05/08/2014 10:10:59 AM PDT by
Cronos
(ObamaÂ’s dislike of Assad is not based on AssadÂ’s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson