Skip to comments.The Canonization Of John Paul ll And John XXIII And “Traditionalist” Pusillanimity
Posted on 04/30/2014 11:36:20 AM PDT by NYer
On this Quasimodo (Dominica in albis, Low, and Divine Mercy) Sunday, I am shocked at the pusillanimity of some of the so-called traditionalists in the Church. A great gift has been given to the whole of the Church with Saints John XXIII and John Paul II and yet, some traditionalists foment an attitude of hunkering down and the enduring the authentic joy of the Church on this day. Likewise, other traditionalist types ask why Blessed Pius IX or Ven. Pius XII has not been canonized.
It is one thing to ask questions such as the latter which are legitimate; it is also legitimate to question whether politics or political correctness play a role in the canonization process, for they shouldnt. But the means and manner in which one asks these things or expresses them especially as directed toward the Churchs Supreme Authority is also an important matter to consider, especially in this post-Christian age. I wonder if it ever occurs to these people that they are furthering the inauthentic imposed division between a so-called pre-Vatican II Church and a post-Vatican II Church.
Instead of thinking with the one Church or employing a hermeneutic of continuity, they perpetrate a divide that was crafted largely by liberals and by liberals, I mean those genuine modernists infected with a fascination for novelty and largely driven by a desire to overturn traditional Catholic thinking, discipline, and morality. Ultimately, along with the liberals, the what I will call jihadi-traditionalists, in their rhetorical expressions and lack of docility toward the Supreme Pastor, perpetuate a division in the Church and weaken the Church Militant.
These jihadi-traditionalist types seek an absolute spotless reality, a utopia that has never existed in the Churchs life throughout all the centuries. I suspect that they sometimes forget that we live in a vale of tears and imagine somehow that there was a time when Catholic discipline and belief were uniform with such military precision that the peasant and the prince never broke a fast, fell asleep at Mass, or slept with his neighbor. Au contraire. The Church has always been at war even within her members. The Devil knows Scripture and Catholic doctrine better than we do and he seeks to undercut it by exaggeration or diminution by whatever means possible.
The jihadi-traditionalists give the impression of military discipline, yet they routinely disobey orders from the Supreme Commander. Instead of following the model of great heroes such as Cardinal Siri, Cardinal Mindszenty, Cardinal Oddi, Fr. Hardon, and countless other priests and laity in their obedience and fidelity to the Roman Churchs Supreme Pastor, they make themselves de facto judges of his decisions an attitude St. Pius X condemned.
Theirs is a way of living in which they are never satisfied. In pursuing such a modus operandi the legitimate questions they ask are obscured by their tactics and their perpetual bombast. And, dare I say it, the latter are the breeding ground for a loss of faith in Christ and the forming of an anti-papal Christianity, which in their case becomes some bizarre sort of Catholic-looking Protestantism.
On the flip side, people who know me will verify that I am a curmudgeon of the first degree and that rah rah Catholicism is one of the things of the modern age that I find detestable. The proliferation of hipster Catholicism reduces the profundity of the message of Christ and the Church to an exercise in banality or flippancy. Modern popularizers of Catholic teachings who have the veneer of orthodoxy but tend toward being tremendous capitalists with cottage industries promoting their own personalities and making money off the Church are distasteful. Slick presentations of the faith count for far less than down-to-earth, getting ones hands dirty with the job of day-to-day living and day-to-day devotion. In a way, their approach is similar to the jihadi-traditionalist. There seems to be a constant pusillanimity: pointing to oneself or a particular idea instead of pointing to the Lord and the constant teaching of the Church.
Indeed, saints are those who point to the Lord. The witness of John XXIII and John Paul II attest to this humble pointing to the Lord and the living out of the faith. Jihadi-traditionalists and hipster Catholics both trivialize the heroic sanctity of these wonderful men of the Church. The former tend to be armchair theologians who will sift any and every single word or breath of the former Pontiffs in order to trip them up, not satisfied with the duly appointed historical and theological experts of the Church (or even the judgment of Pope Benedict XVI); the latter, while praising the Popes, restrict themselves to the ephemeral.
Anyone who reads the diaries of John XXIII or the profundity of the defense of Catholic doctrine and morals by John Paul II must admit that these were two sinners who, by the grace of God, were elected to the Chair of Peter, and to the best of their abilities guided the Church amidst turbulent times. Likewise in their personal living, they strove for holiness and achieved it to a heroic degree under sometimes the direst of circumstances.
Now the Supreme Authority of the Church has declared that it has been proved to its satisfaction that their sanctity is worthy of the name saint and the veneration of the Catholic world.
People need not have to have devotion to these individuals, but they do need to have faith in Christ and the promise He made to His Church and be docile to an act of the Magisterium that is to be definitively held: that Pope St. John XXIII and Pope St. John Paul II are to be inserted alongside Pope St. Pius X and Pope St. Pius V in the catalogue of Pope-saints.
Saints John and John Paul, pray for us.
(And may Blessed Pius IX join their number soon!)
"its satisfaction" seems to come around pretty easily these days, like a dime a dozen. What happened to the traditional process, where a scrupulously conducted examination of merit went on for decades, if not centuries (and wasn't run like a papal popularity contest)?
By a pope who may not have validly occupied the chair, or been so influenced by the "Smoke of Satan in the Church" that one really can't trust each new pronouncement to be infallible in itself.
Yes, because Pius X and Pius V totally would have kissed Korans or taken part in Assisis.
But, hey I'm one of "those" traditionalists.
“Jihadi-traditionalist”? Did the author borrow this silly pejorative from the “Pope Francis Little Book of Insults” or did he dream it up all on his own? And how is it cowardice to voice distaste regarding the transparently obvious politicization of the canonisation process? Since when is rational observation disobedient, or indicative of a utopian mindset? And how does penning a gratuitous attack on fellow Catholics who raised concerns regarding the undeniable scandals and damage to the Church presided over by these Popes differ from the divisive behavior of which he accuses others? This article makes very little sense.
Catholic FReepers seem to have almost as much disdain for Catholic traditionalists as they do Fundamentalist Protestants. It couldn’t possibly be because they reject the concept of actual changelessness, could it? [/sarcasm]
Apparently since being a bigot (or even being accused of being a bigot) could cause permanent exile from the workforce.
Raniero CantalamessaFather Raniero Cantalamessa is the preacher to the Papal Household, a member of the Catholic Delegation for the Dialogue with the Pentecostal churches, an author, speaker, and former Professor at the Catholic University of Milan. Father Cantalamessa is passionate about Christian unity and speaks around the world on the importance of unity within the Church, which is the work of the Holy Spirit.
Thinking themselves more Catholic than the Pope.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.