Thank you you are correct and I did not include metmom in my post to you for which I apologize.
I thing I have noticed as much as we can and have disagreed I can think of only one or two incidences who someone has directly contradicted another poster and essentially called them a liar.
I have seen time after time of two idea diametrically opposed, but where each side posts his links and Scripture passages that are open to differing interpretations - but at the very least if someone calls someone else a cow they will include a humorous picture of ‘Elsie’ (the cow).
This is different - this is someone with imperfect or faulty knowledge calling someone else wrong. That is not the same as differing -even vehemently on interpretations of scripture or the Catholic church. As intense as things sometimes get - when folks retire they must surely thing over at least some of the discussions.
I can only speak for myself but it has strengthen my faith immeasurably and I would venture that is the case on either side of the debate. For this I am grateful.
But metmom still called me a liar and I am not.
Well Gamecock is not a referee in such matters.
Now if you’ll excuse me I have responsibilities elsewhere.
You spoke of me and did not ping me, in a reply where you apologized for not pinging someone you spoke of.
HMMMmmm...
You spoke of me and did not include the word BEAUTIFUL in front of the word cow.
No milk for YOU!
You DO understand, don't you, that "essentially" calling someone a liar by disagreeing with them is NOT the same thing as directly calling someone a liar - which you DID and which is what is against the rules? How many times do you have to be reminded to stop making personal comments and making the thread about the person???