Well, I’m reading this thread, and I’m anyone right?
What I see that I’m arguing against is forcing women impregnated by rape to bear those children without their consent.
What I see that you are arguing for is raping a raped woman again, but instead of using a penis, you want to use a law.
Wow, that is breathtakingly pro-abortion and hostile to freerepublic's pro-life community.
and what part of "children" is it ok to kill. It is not the children's fault how they were conceived. Murdering them is selecting them for euthanasia for the sins of their parents.
What I read is that you want to take an innocent victim of rape and make her a murderer, make her sin against God...
you want to add to her burden by adding guilt,. not alleviate her of emotional and psychological pain..
a woman can get over a rape long before she can get over the horror and guilt she will feel from murdering her innocent baby....
at a time when she could be turning to God for comfort and healing for the rape that she had no part in, you want her to spit in His face and kill His creation...
Thus making herself an active participate in willful sin and a crime against God...the breaking of one of the Ten Commandments...
and placing herself in a perilous place with God..
way to go genius...
You are so good at scenarios...what if a married woman is raped and becomes pregnant...is convinced the baby is her husband’s so carries it to term and delivers the baby. Lets say after the birth of her baby she decides to get DNA done and finds the baby was actually fathered by the rapist. Is it ok for her to murder that baby?
Abortion is murder of a living baby, that baby is alive inside the mother...babies do not suddenly become alive after they are born or at some magical date.