Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Brief History of Same-Sex Marriage and Why Catholics Are Losing the War Against It
Catholic World Report ^ | February 13, 2014 | Carrie Gress

Posted on 02/14/2014 4:07:38 PM PST by NYer

Larry Lamont and Jerry Slater take part in a symbolic same-sex marriage ceremony outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh Feb. 4. The Scottish Parliament passed a bill that will allow same-sex marriages to be performed later this year, but religious organizations have the right not to perform them. (CNS photo/Russell Cheyne, Reuters)

Surveying history for anything resembling same-sex marriage in any culture, clime, or era is a fruitless search. It has never been proposed, not even in ancient Greece, as some would like to argue. So why does this enigma of history seem like just the next progressive step in our own culture?

The answer, oddly enough, seems to be locked up in the birth control pill. Let me explain.

Healthy cultures and civilizations all have one thing in common. There is a deep understanding (even if not always acted upon or articulated) that my life has meaning because of the sacrifices I make for those who come after me, through loyalty to a clan, tribe or wider society. This simple "our lives for theirs" approach is what has animated history for centuries. Think of the building of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, which the early masons knew would never be finished in their lifetimes. "Our lives for theirs" is an easy barometer to see if a civilization is on the rise or on decline. When that order becomes inverted, like ancient Rome or late Renaissance Venice, where each man and woman lives just for himself, the civilization will decay and cease to exist.

The sexual revolution of the 1960s is a marked example of this inversion in the West with the arrival of the pill. Never in the history of the world had the fundamental link between human sexuality and reproduction been so decidedly unhinged, ushering in a new conception of sexuality. Sex became about many things: self-expression, self-gratification, exploration, desire, etc.…but not about its main reason for existence: to propagate the species. The general "our life for theirs" attitude lived out by parents for centuries suddenly became suspect as self-gratification came into vogue. "Why would anyone voluntarily put themselves through all that hard work to raise more than two children?" became the new model under which we live today.

While contraception of various sorts was nothing new, the wholesale use of it was. Without the "baby bonus," concepts of self-control, self-mastery, self-donation have not only became outdated, but an object of mockery. Denuding sex of its natural procreative character made sex simply about "me," not my spouse, my children, my family, or my community. Porn, "twerking," and the over-sexualization of young children are only the latest additions in the "sex is about me" trajectory.

Aristotle (384 -322 BC) was the first to argue for the link between what we find pleasurable and what is needed for a healthy polis, or more generally, society. An act was pleasurable to ensure that it would take place, but was not the most important reason for the action. Food tastes good so we will eat. The connection between sexual pleasure and procreation is why same-sex marriage has never been accepted in the history of the world before. It was always generally understood that such a "marriage" is not fruitful no matter what the feelings may be of those involved.

Generations of couples coupling without conceiving have led to the misperception that sexuality is, in fact, merely another contact sport, or whatever else you may want it to be, without a fixed meaning other than pleasure. Sex in the minds of most no longer has any natural link with making babies. And if the link dares to happen biologically when nature asserts herself, it is a failure, a mistake, an accident – not the natural course of things.

How, then, one asks, could Catholics be so cruel to want to deny same-sex marriage to those who just have a different idea about sex? Why limit ourselves to heterosexual activity within marriage? Can't pleasure and satisfaction be found elsewhere? Well, clearly they can, to a degree. But babies cannot. And the stable families necessary to raise healthy children, study after study has shown, cannot be reformulated into any shape of laissez-faire family. Statistics show that 95 percent of Catholics are using contraception to limit family size. Clearly there has been a dramatic failure to educate ourselves about what the Church teaches on love and sexuality in the pews, in classrooms, and in Catholic media. But at the heart of it, the Christian ethos, embodied in Christ's own sacrifice of himself for all of us, needs to be revived. Ultimately, are our actions life-giving or sterile? To this question, our answer should always be "our lives for theirs."

Statistics show that 95 percent of Catholics are using contraception to limit family size. Clearly there has been a dramatic failure to educate ourselves about what the Church teaches on love and sexuality in the pews, in classrooms, and in Catholic media. But at the heart of it, the Christian ethos, embodied in Christ's own sacrifice of himself for all of us, needs to be revived. Ultimately, are our actions life-giving or sterile? To this question, our answer should always be "our lives for theirs."


TOPICS: Catholic; History; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; ssm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last
Comment #121 Removed by Moderator

To: Iscool

“Since you can’t offer any evidence that my post is wrong, there’s no reason for anyone to believe it is...”

Except that it is wrong. You claimed it was how the Church defined herself. The definition actually came from Fr. Hardon.


122 posted on 02/15/2014 3:24:09 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

“... its existence doesn’t absolve the bishops of their responsibility to Teach, Sanctify and Govern.”

No, it doesn’t. But it does mean we can do what was always our responsibility which was to learn the faith on our own and we should not shirk that responsibility.


123 posted on 02/15/2014 3:26:07 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Our lovely couple, members of the Gays of Scotland, would like to thank you all for being here today.


Patrick FitzGerald

&

Gerald FitzPatrick

124 posted on 02/15/2014 3:29:42 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bboop
The war has been won.

Ya think???


The Health Risks of gay sex.

http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0075.html

 

Genesis 13:13
Now the men of Sodom were wicked and were sinning greatly against the LORD.

Genesis 18:20-21
20. Then the LORD said, "The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and
their sin so grievous
21. that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know."

Genesis 19:4-7
4. Before they had gone to bed, all the men
from every part of the city of Sodom--both young and old--surrounded the house.
5. They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them
."
6. Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him
7. and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing.

Psalms 12:8 The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among men.

Doonesbury Cartoon for Feb/08/2013

Isaiah 3:9 The look on their faces testifies against them; they parade their sin like Sodom; they do not hide it. Woe to them! They have brought disaster upon themselves.

2 Peter 2:13b Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you.


Ezekiel 16:49-50
49. "`Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.
50. They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen.



2 Peter 2

1. But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them--bringing swift destruction on themselves.
2. Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute.
3. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.
4. For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them into gloomy dungeons to be held for judgment;
5. if he did not spare the ancient world when he brought the flood on its ungodly people, but protected Noah, a preacher of righteousness, and seven others;
6. if he condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah by burning them to ashes, and made them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly;
7. and if he rescued Lot, a righteous man, who was distressed by the filthy lives of lawless men
8. (for that righteous man, living among them day after day, was tormented in his righteous soul by the lawless deeds he saw and heard)--
9. if this is so, then the Lord knows how to rescue godly men from trials and to hold the unrighteous for the day of judgment, while continuing their punishment.
10. This is especially true of those who follow the corrupt desire of the sinful nature and despise authority. Bold and arrogant, these men are not afraid to slander celestial beings;
11. yet even angels, although they are stronger and more powerful, do not bring slanderous accusations against such beings in the presence of the Lord.
12. But these men blaspheme in matters they do not understand. They are like brute beasts, creatures of instinct, born only to be caught and destroyed, and like beasts they too will perish.
13. They will be paid back with harm for the harm they have done.
Their idea of pleasure is to carouse in broad daylight. They are blots and blemishes, reveling in their pleasures while they feast with you.



But there IS hope!!!

1 Corinthians 6:9-11

9. Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived:
Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders
10. nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
11. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.


If you could NOT change, you would be in most pitiful shape...
 

 
 
 
 
 
 


The Health Risks of gay sex.


125 posted on 02/15/2014 3:30:35 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
I suspect that a better statement is: "Surveying history for anything resembling same-sex marriage in any culture that survived long enough to be noted by historians is a fruitless search."

I see what you did here: BOTH of them!

126 posted on 02/15/2014 3:31:27 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Galatians 5:12


127 posted on 02/15/2014 3:32:08 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Late again!


128 posted on 02/15/2014 3:35:03 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: piusv
Could you point me to the post where you were supposedly wrong?

Sure...Post #45...

129 posted on 02/15/2014 3:49:50 PM PST by Iscool (Ya mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailer park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
So, according to you all Catholics act like Protestants but some of those Catholics don't fail?

If all Catholics act like Protestants, then all Catholics fail.

LOL. Nice try there, "bud".

130 posted on 02/15/2014 4:07:51 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Comment #131 Removed by Moderator

To: vladimir998

Is it possible for you to post to others without using personal insults?


132 posted on 02/15/2014 4:22:00 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

All the Romans, not just the Roman Christians, would have been better off it Nero had done the “cutting off” to himself instead of to poor Sporus.


133 posted on 02/15/2014 4:22:05 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

You know what Vladimir, I have tried to explain to you that my use of the word “heirarchy” was not all inclusive and that I don’t believe all in the hierarchy are responsible. You choose not to believe me. Whatever.


134 posted on 02/15/2014 4:32:59 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: piusv

I didn’t use any.


135 posted on 02/15/2014 4:37:49 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: piusv

“You know what Vladimir, I have tried to explain to you that my use of the word “heirarchy” was not all inclusive and that I don’t believe all in the hierarchy are responsible. You choose not to believe me. Whatever.”

For some bizarre reason you go on and on about that.


136 posted on 02/15/2014 4:39:07 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Of course not. Your latest was removed by the moderator.


137 posted on 02/15/2014 4:39:13 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: piusv

“Of course not. Your latest was removed by the moderator.”

I know. And I still didn’t use any.


138 posted on 02/15/2014 4:43:03 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Uh-huh. Apparently the moderator thought you did. And that’s all that matters.


139 posted on 02/15/2014 4:47:45 PM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: piusv

“Uh-huh. Apparently the moderator thought you did. And that’s all that matters.”

Actually no it doesn’t. Removal does not imply guilt. Anyone who has been here for a while will know that.


140 posted on 02/15/2014 4:57:00 PM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson