Posted on 02/07/2014 4:44:09 AM PST by GonzoII
Have you been born again, my friend? Thousands of Catholics have been asked this question by well-meaning Fundamentalists or Evangelicals. Of course, by born again the Protestant usually means: Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior through the recitation of the sinners prayer?’ How is a Catholic to respond? The simple Catholic response is: Yes, I have been born againwhen I was baptized. In fact, Jesus famous born again discourse of John 3:3-5, which is where we find the words born again (or “born anew”) in Scripture, teaches us about the essential nature of baptism: Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born anew, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Nicodemus said to him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?” Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. At this point, a Fundamentalist or Evangelical will respond almost predictably: Baptism does not save you, brother; John 3:5 says we must be born of water and the Spirit. The Catholic will then be told the water of John 3:5 has nothing to do with baptism. Depending on the preference of the one to whom the Catholic is speaking, the water will either be interpreted as mans natural birth (the water being amniotic fluid), and the Spirit would then represent the new birth, or the water would represent the word of God through which one is born again when he accepts Jesus as his personal Lord and Savior. Amniotic Fluid vs. Baptismal Water To claim the water of John 3:5 is amniotic fluid is to stretch the context just a smidgen! When we consider the actual words and surrounding context of John 3, the waters of baptism seem to be the more reasonableand biblicalinterpretation. Consider these surrounding texts: John 1:31-34: Jesus was baptized. If you compare the parallel passage in St. Matthews gospel (3:16), you find that when Jesus was baptized, the heavens were opened and the Spirit descended upon him. Obviously, this was not because Jesus needed to be baptized. In fact, St. John the Baptist noted that he needed to be baptized by Jesus (see Matthew 3:14)! Jesus was baptized in order fulfill all righteousness and to give knowledge of salvation to his people in the forgiveness of their sins, according to Scripture (cf. Matt. 3:15; Luke 1:77). In other words, Jesus demonstrably showed us the way the heavens would be opened to us so that the Holy Spirit would descend upon us through baptism. John 2:1-11: Jesus performed his first miracle. He transformed water into wine. Notice, Jesus used water from six stone jars for the Jewish rites of purification. According to the Septuagint as well as the New Testament these purification waters were called baptismoi (see LXX, Numbers 19:9-19; cf. Mark 7:4). We know that Old Testament rites, sacrifices, etc. were only a shadow of the good things to come (Hebrews 10:1). They could never take away sins. This may well be why six stone jars are specified by St. Johnto denote imperfection, or a human number (cf. Rev. 13:18). It is interesting to note that Jesus transformed these Old Testament baptismal waters into winea symbol of New Covenant perfection (see Joel 3:18; Matthew 9:17). John 3:22: Immediately after Jesus born again discourse to Nicodemus, what does He do? “… Jesus and his disciples went into the land of Judea; there he remained with them and baptized.” It appears he baptized folks. This is the only time in Scripture we find Jesus apparently actually baptizing. John 4:1-2: Jesus disciples then begin to baptize at Jesus command. It appears from the text, Jesus most likely only baptized his disciples and then they baptized everyone else. In summary, Jesus was baptized, transformed the baptismal waters, and then gave his famous born again discourse. He then baptized before commissioning the apostles to go out and baptize. To deny Jesus was teaching us about baptism in John 3:3-5 is to ignore the clear biblical context. Moreover, John 3:5 is not describing two events; it describes one event. The text does not say unless one is born of water and then born again of the Spirit… It says unless one is born of water and Spirit… If we hearken back to the Lords own baptism in John 1 and Matt. 3, we notice when our Lord was baptized the Holy Spirit descended simultaneously upon him. This was one event, involving both water and the Spirit. And so it is with our baptism. If we obey God in being baptizedthats our part of the dealwe can count on God to concurrently open the heavens for us and give us the Holy Spirit. And finally, it would be anachronistic to read into Jesus use of water to mean physical birth in Johns gospel. In fact, St. John had just used a word to refer to physical birth in John 1:12-13, but it wasnt water: But to all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God; who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God. St. John here tells us we are not made children of God by birth (of blood), or by our own attempts whether they be through our lower nature (of the flesh) or even through the higher powers of our soul (the will of man); rather, we must be born of God, or by Gods power. Notice, St. John refers to natural birth colloquially as of blood, not of water. Washing of Water by the Word It is perhaps an even greater stretch to attempt to claim the water of John 3:3-5 represents the word of God. At least with the amniotic fluid argument, you have mention of birth in the immediate context. However, the Protestant will sometimes refer to Ephesians 5:25-26 and a few other texts to make this point: Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word See? a Protestant may say, The washing of water is here equated to the word that cleanses us. If you couple this text with Jesus words in John 15:3, You are already made clean by the word which I have spoken to you, the claim is made, that the water of John 3:5 would actually refer to the word of God rather than baptism. The Catholic Response Beyond the obvious fact that there is nothing in the context of John’s gospel to even remotely point to “water” as referring to ”the word,” we can point out immediately a point of agreement. Both Catholics and Protestants agree that Jesus wordsunless one is born anew (or, again)speak of mans initial entrance into the body of Christ through Gods grace. Perhaps it would be helpful at this point to ask what the New Testament writers saw as the instrument whereby one first enters into Christ. This would be precisely what we are talking about when we speak of being born again. I Peter 3:20-21: … in the days of Noah during the building of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were saved through water. Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Romans 6:3-4: “Are you unaware that we who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were indeed buried with Him through baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might live in newness of life.” Galatians 3:27: “For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.” I Cor. 12:13: “For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one bodyJews or Greeks, slaves or freeand all were made to drink of one Spirit (See also Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38, Acts 22:16 and Col. 2:11-13). If baptism is the way the unsaved are brought into Christ, no wonder Christ spoke of being born of water and spirit. Baptism is the instrument of new birth according to the New Testament. If you liked this and would like to dive deeper into learning what Catholics believe and why they believe it, click here. |
That doesn't answer what I asked. Go back and re-read my post, then try again.
Currently, I am outside all Churches, religions, and boxes. It is a spiritual freedom quite like I have never experienced before. Not sure i want to go back to any denomination or religion and start putting layers back onto what I just escaped by the Grace of God.
My only goal is to be baptized as an adult.
Rather than respond point by point...
Everything you posted was false - either made up or perverted.
And the snarky tone of your post is far from Christ’s command that Christians love one another.
If John's account in chapter 6 foreshadows the Lord's Table, it is inconceivable that John does not mention the Eucharist in the upper room discourse.
They were late to the party by almost 100 years ... but they like to suppose they called the party ...
“So you and Judas will be good buddies”
Ouch! I just speak from my heart and the Truth that resides in my Spirit. Why the vitriol? How about we just disagree and leave it at that!
YOu still haven’t posted any scriptures that show babies were baptized...Try again...
And you haven’t posted any examples where only Adults were baptized. Secondly, if you do not declare your faith in Jesus Christ and you are 3 years old do you go to Hell?
You just admitted that you don't read the bible or you would know these things...
Act 16:32 And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house.
They preached to everyone in the house...One should be able to conclude that every one in the house could not only hear but understand as well...No babies...
Act 10:43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
Act 10:44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word. Act 10:47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
There's a requirement...You must believe in Jesus for baptism...No babies...
Act 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
No baptism without repentance...No babies...
AMPU, can you imagine trading eternal security for that???
I see no reason why just anyone would not be sufficient to perform the duty but I'd lean more to having a Christian involved....I personally subscribe to being 'dunked'...
Baptism is not something God does...It is something you do...A testimony to God and the world...
I'd recommend someone with experience or at least practice...You want to make sure you come back up...
I was baptized in a lake with bunches of Christians standing in and out of the water singing hymns and lots of prayer...Potluck dinner/picnic after...A memorable experience...
Not big on any organized religion right now...just me, a bible, some family, whatever. Most of my family is still Catholic, and we just respect each other's beliefs.
To me...Jesus is my Savior...the rest is noise.
I'll bet if you look up "non-denominational fellowship" in your area and pray about it, God will lead to you a place for baptism.
Absolutely not...Bible says the law was given that we would be knowledgeable and convicted of sin...
You can not be under the law if you don't even know what it is...If you are a baby, there is no sin...
Rom 4:15 Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.
Rom 5:13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
In short, no.
I believe it is unthinking regurgitation though. There is a sadness about everyone who substitutes a relationship with Him for any any manner of false religion.
“And you havent posted any examples where only Adults were baptized.”
Every baptism in the New Testament.
I come from a very large Catholic family, and sadly my decision to walk away from that religion was not respected by some of them. My Mom gives me the most grief about it, even when I tell her my relationship with Christ has deepened because of my simplified Faith. My sister (born again) and I joke about being step-children in our large family because of our departure from Catholicism.
I’m going to take your advice and knock on some doors to find my Baptism and let God do the rest!
Dunked, water poured, sprinkled water, all are accepted for baptism.
True, it was said in Acts that whole households baptised and that included little babies.
I will pray for you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.