Posted on 12/20/2013 8:22:58 PM PST by NKP_Vet
LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Here are the comments that cost Phil Robertson his place on the show. Speaking in the January issue of GQ, Robertson told the magazine:
"It seems like, to me, a vagina-as a man-would be more desirable than a man's anus. That's just me," Robertson told GQ. "I'm just thinking: There's more there! She's got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I'm saying? But hey, sin: It's not logical, my man. It's just not logical."
The reporter asked Robertson what he found sinful, so Robertson explained.
"It seems like, to me, a vagina-as a man-would be more desirable than a man's anus. That's just me," Robertson told the magazine. "I'm just thinking: There's more there! She's got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I'm saying? But hey, sin: It's not logical, my man. It's just not logical . Don't be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers-they won't inherit the kingdom of God. Don't deceive yourself. It's not right."
(Excerpt) Read more at catholic.org ...
Bill O’Reilly stands with Evil on this.
I stand with Phil, Paul, God, and all that is good.
Even though I stand with good, it doesn’t matter. Who has the most power seems to matter, and it would seem that the homosexual minority has the power.
If you like your vagina you can keep your vagina?
Bill who?
O’Reilly is like a lot of northeast Republicans: he probably knows few Southerns .Has he ever visited the South? Yankees are so parochial.
” - - - The reporter asked Robertson what he found sinful, so Robertson explained. - - - “
IOW, “This is an OPINION test, and only Homos have grading privileges, so please, PLEASE lie just like politicians do every day!”
His free speech may not have been violated, but his civil rights were!
It is against the law to discriminate against someone due to their religious beliefs.
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of race and color, as well as national origin, sex, and religion. Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments. It also applies to employment agencies and to labor organizations, as well as to the federal government.
Dang..now that’s a point I hadn’t thought of...although Lord knows I’ve had enough EEO drilled into me over the years. Maybe Phil needs to talk to a good lawyer....
But you know, it’s his right to say what he said and A&E made a choice in how to react. I really hope they will now be left alone to deal with the consequences of that choice - it could be a good “teachable moment” about the power of Gay America vs. Traditional America.
Bigots come in all shapes and sizes. This time ti came with GLAAD.
Just about all the Fox News team have thrown Robertson under the bus. Hannity is the only one that seems to think Robertson got screwed, but then again ends a program saying “personally I don’t care what someone does behind closed doors”. Tonight on O’Reilly that homo “marriage” supporting Bernard Goldberg said Robertson was “despicable” for saying what he did about sodomites and that Christians have no sense if they take the Bible literally. I have always known he was a Christian-hater, but he really showed it tonight. He also said A&E was right to suspend Robertson. Howard Kurtz said the same thing. To me Fox News is the little brother of CNN. Day by day they cave more and more into the homosexual agenda.
It seems to me the last 4 or 5 states that accepted ‘gay marriage’ got a lot less coverage on FR and other media outlets than this cable TV duck thing. Maybe I’m wrong. And of course I think garbage A&E is being completely hypocritical on several levels, but I don’t reckon this is a good sign. I mean look at the number of threads about duck dynasty as compared to the threads about what is going on in New Mexico and Utah.
I mean if the Utah thing stands or whatever, that’s 17 states that have accepted it or will accept it. I dunno, I’m not saying things like Chick-fil-A and duck dynasty aren’t important, it’s just that maybe a state accepting it should be a bigger deal than it seems to have become.
Freegards
Now that's a good example of a loaded question.
Yes indeed Fox is going down the tubes. Hannity may end up being the last man standing. They already marginalized him to an hour later for eye candy Kelly.
Fox is stacked with fiscal conservatives and lacks the moral conservatism it had 10 years ago. You are correct they have caved to the gay agenda and give lip service to Life issues.
I would like to see Palin get a show or Rick Santorum on the network. But I am sure they both have bigger plans:)
Thanks for posting this article.
Hollywood is faggy. As is the interior decoration global conglomerate. Wanna get a job as a department store display windows designing engineer?
You have a valid point, however this DD deal is a clear rallying call. It is a clear example of the sodomite theophobes demanding acceptance and exposing that they never meant tolerance. They portrayed themselves as victims and now everyone is seeing just how much these fringe 2 presenters are little Maos looking to lop off heads.
Well.... The homosexual minority is a majority in most of the forms of the news and entertainment media.
The news and entertainment media is the 'power'.
We give it power much like the Romans who went to watch at the coliseum. We're even sacrificing the Christians, just like they did. Pretty much for the same reason.
“It is a clear example of the sodomite theophobes demanding acceptance and exposing that they never meant tolerance.”
That’s true. The guy said nothing outrageous. At all.
But I dunno, I don’t think it’s a good sign when an obvious garbage network like A&E gets more coverage in it’s obvious and predictable action for what the duck dude said than an actual state of the union accepting gay marriage. Not that rallying points are unimportant, but I don’t think it would have been this way ten years ago. I just can’t see something that impacts cable TV being as meaningful as a whole state government succumbing to the homosexualist agenda. Something is wrong with the ratio of coverage here, in my opinion.
Freegards
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.