Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly vs Bible commentaries on Luke 6:37 (O'Reilly factor on Phil Robertson. Video)
YouTube/FOX News ^ | 12/20/2013 | Bill O'Reilly et al

Posted on 12/20/2013 8:46:47 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist

Click on the YouTube link below to watch Bill O'Reilly's chat with Laura Ingraham on last night's The O'Reilly Factor (12/19/2013). Bill O'Reilly quotes Luke 6:37, which is displayed on the screen:

"Judge not, and you will not be judged. Condemn not, and you will not be condemned."

Listen to what he has to say. Do you agree with what he has to say about "Judge not lest ye be judged..."?

Now compare what he has to say with what is at Catholic.com and Catholic.org on this subject. Go to those sites and the first thing you see today is a discussion about what Phil Robertson had to say and the issue of homosexuality and right and wrong. They both seem to be in agreeement with the following:

1.) NIV Study Bible, page 1550, Luke 6:37, commentary section:

"Jesus did not relieve His followers of the need for discerning right and wrong (cf. vv. 43-45), but he condemned unjust and hypocritical judging of others."

2.) Holman Concise Bible Commentary, page 453. Luke 6:12-49

"...love recognizes sin in the self before it hastens to deal with sin in others."

3.) Fire Bible: Student Edition, page 1397 [for those in that age group]. Commentary section.

"This is one of the most quoted - but often misunderstood and abused - Bible passages. Ungodly people often cite this principle to justify their sinful behavior and lifestyles. The fact is that God's people must constantly use discernment, make wise judgments and accept or reject certain beliefs and behaviors (See Pr. 3:21; Jn. 7:24).

1.) We have to discern what is right and wrong by the scriptures and take a stand for what is right. 2.) We have to realize that we are sinners (which Phil Robertson did) BEFORE we deal with the sin in others, as Holman shows above, thus showing that sin in others must be dealt with AFTER our own, and 3.) certain behaviors must be called out and rejected.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics; Theology
KEYWORDS: ae; billoreilly; duckcommander; duckdynasty; foxnews; homosexiswrong; homosexualagenda; ingraham; lauraingraham; moralabsolutes; oreilly; oreillyfactor; philrobertson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Roman Catholic, various Protestant commentaries all covered...
1 posted on 12/20/2013 8:46:47 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All

YouTube
12/19/2013

Bill O’Reilly Offers Suprising Reaction to Phil Robertson Controversy

http://www.youtube.com/watch/?v=DI3B85tJHPA&feature=


2 posted on 12/20/2013 8:48:41 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

And this is all very well and good. But what leftist morons do not understand is that Phild DID NOT JUDGE anyone.

He correctly identified sin - as any Christian can and must do. But he didn’t condemn anyone. The God of Heaven - through His Word does that.


3 posted on 12/20/2013 8:50:28 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
As I posted on another thread:

Bloviator did a really poor job tonight ...... I guess he either didn't read the GQ article, or he didn't get this far:

“We never, ever judge someone on who’s going to heaven, hell. That’s the Almighty’s job. We just love ’em, give ’em the good news about Jesus—whether they’re homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort ’em out later, you see what I’m saying?”

So much for his "Phil is judging" argument.

4 posted on 12/20/2013 8:50:50 AM PST by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I agree. It is very good.

Phil Robertson did not judge anyone, and he did correctly identify sin, which the commentaries back up.

And he didn’t condemn anyone.

Now, what do you think about O’Reilly and his comments?


5 posted on 12/20/2013 8:53:40 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

BOR is a self-aggrandizing horse’s patoot (with apologies to horses everywhere).


6 posted on 12/20/2013 8:54:51 AM PST by Dr. Thorne ("How long, O Lord, holy and true?" - Rev. 6:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia; All

Yep. Robertson did not judge anyone. He admitted he was a sinner, discerned what was wrong in himself first, then others second and rebuked it.


7 posted on 12/20/2013 8:55:21 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

This verse is constantly taken out of context.

Contextually, God’s word is clearly talking about self-righteous judgment.

Luke 6:39 - 42 makes that clear.

39 And He spoke a parable to them: “Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into the ditch?

40 A disciple is not above his teacher, but everyone who is perfectly trained will be like his teacher.

41 And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not perceive the plank in your own eye?

42 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me remove the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the plank that is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck that is in your brother’s eye.

Christians must judge but not do so hypocritically. Of course the ultimate judgment belongs to God.


8 posted on 12/20/2013 8:55:46 AM PST by schaef21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All

What do other people here think about what O’Reilly said?


9 posted on 12/20/2013 8:55:59 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I’m at work. You-tube blocked. And I certainly don’t watch BOR when I’m able.

“Now, what do you think about O’Reilly and his comments?”

Only thing I know is what I’ve read here on FR about them. And that is the usual: Ted Baxter is clueless.


10 posted on 12/20/2013 8:57:30 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I have wrestled with the quote, ‘Judge not lest ye be judged’ and I knew it couldn’t possibly mean what I had been told. Thank you very much for its not that I am super critical of others but I could not reconcile it with the actions and words of Christ in other instances.

Thanks again, I knew there was a reason I hung out on FR with people smarter then me.

Merry Christmas!


11 posted on 12/20/2013 8:58:09 AM PST by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

BOR is a liar. He cannot state his views without lying about what other people have said or done.


12 posted on 12/20/2013 8:59:04 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schaef21

Thank you for summing it up nicely.


13 posted on 12/20/2013 8:59:24 AM PST by yellowdoghunter (Welcome to Obamastan! (Mrs. Yellowdoghunter))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Are you sure you didn’t watch the video? Yours is a very well informed post for someone who didn’t even take a little peak.


14 posted on 12/20/2013 9:02:05 AM PST by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Bill O’Reilly trying to play both sides of the argument as usual. You can say that homosexuality is a sin, but if you say unrepentant homosexuals are not going to heaven then you are guilty of “judging” according to O’Reilly?!? What utter nonsense, O’Reilly might have had a point if Phil had stopped some random homosexual and screamed he was going to hell, but saying unrepentant sin, any sin, will keep the practicer out of heaven is far from “judging” it's stating a biblical truth. Does O’Reilly (supposedly a good Catholic) think an unrepentant homosexual will go to heaven? I wish somebody would have asked him (of course he would have just avoided the question)....
15 posted on 12/20/2013 9:02:28 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I read the original GQ article, When I watched the O'Reilly show the first thing I noticed that he did not read the original article. At best his info and response was from the talking points from GLAAD...

Avatar no longer posted to protest one of A&E's parent companies

16 posted on 12/20/2013 9:03:01 AM PST by darkwing104 (Do not take my word for it, these are my opinions...Do your own Homework)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I saw this last night. He’s making up his own scripture as he’s going along again.


17 posted on 12/20/2013 9:03:37 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Bill O’Blather…. certainly my choice for commentary on the Bible /s


18 posted on 12/20/2013 9:06:32 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Aww thanks. But ya know. One just can't go wrong with this sentiment about Bill O'Reilly:
Ted Baxter is clueless

19 posted on 12/20/2013 9:07:02 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Like so many others, BOR confuses the sin with the sinner. It’s God’s job to judge the sinner, but it’s our job to judge the sin. Discernment is exactly the right word. Without it we’re not even animals, we’re potted plants. We make judgments by the second based on SOME criterion. And for many, that criterion is the Bible. Is BOR going to tell us that we can’t say or believe that murder (or stealing or lying or even speeding) is wrong and to be avoided? I don’t think so. “Judge not . . .” couldn’t be less appropriate an argument.


20 posted on 12/20/2013 9:10:25 AM PST by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson