Posted on 10/20/2013 11:29:26 AM PDT by CHRISTIAN DIARIST
Do you believe Christians will establish The Kingdom on earth and then Christ returns? I ask because I believe the Eastern Orthodox have a similar belief and call it Christendom.
The Czechs tied themselves to the German Empire and their kings aimed to rule it
however, , tying yourself to a higher culture (the Germanic one) is always difficult -- you can get swamped. And that's what happened to the Czechs.
The Hus reaction was against Germanization to a large extent, hence the effort to keep the Czech language alive
I believe that the kingdom is established in us. I won’t waste any thought on the Second Coming. As far as I am concerned, Christ never left. He lives in me.
Though I agree the term "born again" has been perverted and misused, I still believe it expressed an extremely essential point in why Christ came in the first place. He certainly didn't come here to "show us the way to live" - though we should strive to be more like Jesus every day. He didn't even come to demonstrate how we can live perfect, holy lives in order to please God - though we are called to "be holy as I am holy". His primary purpose was as the Lamb of God who would take away the sins of the world. He was the fulfillment of the Passover lamb, the blood of bulls and goats placed on the Mercy Seat on every Day of Atonement and in all feast days and sacrifices and offerings given to the Jews for signs of future completion.
Being "saved", "born again", "born from above", being sanctified, justified, made righteous, made holy - are all terms that signify both a state and a status, or condition. We were born into this world ALREADY at enmity with God. We inherited a sin nature and nobody has to teach us to sin - we figure it out pretty early all by ourselves. In Ephesians 2, Paul pretty much spreads it out for us:
So, when we have received Jesus Christ as Savior, believing on Him to save us from our sins, we are ALREADY positionally seated with Him in heaven, even though we still inhabit our human flesh here on earth. Our "state" is being the redeemed, blood-bought children of God because we WERE born again into His family by faith. Instead of seeing being saved as a "not-until-I-die" kinda thing, God wants us to understand that we ARE, right now, saved. When we die, we WILL be with Him in heaven because we have been born again of "incorruptible seed".
If you are His, your relationship will continue to grow deeper and stronger because it is Christ IN you, the hope of glory. There was a "mystery" Paul said that was revealed to him by Christ - it was something that Jesus did not mention in His earthly ministry which WAS about the Kingdom of God. This mystery, Paul said was that:
We do not need to fear, because Christ IS in us and we are sealed with the Holy Spirit until the day of redemption - when we go to dwell with Him for eternity in heaven. This is an assurance that we can know RIGHT NOW. He wouldn't have said that if it's an uncertainty or something we cannot know until we die. As Paul says in Romans 8:15,
Hope you have a good night!
This is my last post to you, feel free to have the last word.
This is my last post to you, feel free to have the last word.
And as the scriptures show, and most all of the translators know, the primary definition is not the one always used, or required...
As long as there are secondary and tertiary definitions of words, it shows they have a use and have been used and in this case, they are used where necessary in the scriptures...
We must be born once and then born from above the second time, thus; born again...Pretty simple...
LOL. Excellent analogy. If God is building His Body, and all will be raised up on that day (John 6), you are right...how could a part be lost? We are in the hands of the Most High and He has written our names on the back of His hand.
If you are correct then please answer this question which none of your fellow protestants has been able to answer nor even attempted to answer: If Jesus really meant to say born "again" why would he use the ambiguous word Anothon, instead of the word "Palon" which actually unambiguously means again?
The word anothon may seem to us ambiguous but Jesus reply to Nicodemus may have had more than one level of meaning such that a simple “again” in Greek would not convey.
If we are to say “above” is the best or only proper word to use then “from above” in what sense?
If we are to say above is the best or only proper word to use then from above in what sense?
In the sense that it could only come from God. Nicodemus was focused on the Carnal/ material aspect.
Just as Jesus had to be the Son of God. No mere man could be the savior of the world. It had to be Jesus who was both man and God.
There are three types of "Beings." There are animals (Dogs, Chickens, cats etc...) they have no soul they are pure material. Next you have the Angels. They are pure spirit, created not born, no material nature.
Then there is the humans. We are both Spirit and Flesh, posing both a spiritual and material nature.
God created Adam and then breathed life into him. The word used is Pneuma, or spirit.
Since we have already had a carnal fleshly birth this "birth" must be from above. It must be from God, a spiritual birth, restoring the bond destroyed by Adam and Eve.
Nicodemus and Jesus spoke the same language so “again”, a second time, must have been at one meaning of what Jesus said. By further explanation Jesus shows Nicodemus misinterprets Jesus’ statement. John used a word with several possible meanings for a reason.
Born physically, born from spirit, born and born “again”. “From above”? Certainly.
I think either one might be justified but the term “born again” may make some think of the over used question, “Are you born again?” and so dislike it from the start.
Animals have souls but no spirits...
I have been out, so forgive me for not noting this sooner. Very good points. It is either grace, or a wage due us for something we did. Absolutely.
LORD I AM NOT WORTY TO RECEIVE YOU, BUT SAY THE WORD AND I SHALL BE HEALED.
We are never worthy or sin free, but I think we are to be in an active journey to behave and do our best in this human condition and hell on earth.
We are never worthy or sin free, but I think we are to be in an active journey to behave and do our best in this human condition and hell on earth."
There are so many errors in this post it may take several paragraphs to address them all.
First, yes, of course, Jesus said to go forth and sin no more. Now the question is, "Can you do this?" My suspicion is that if we all followed you around watching every move, every thought, every lapse (when you did not love the Lord your God with you whole heart, soul and mind), we would find you wanting. Recall, Jesus said your righteousness had to exceed that of the Pharisees...not just that you needed to stop sinning.
Your post belies the fact that you think NOT doing sin is enough to merit salvation. Tragically, the human condition suffers from two problems...Sin and lacking righteousness. Even if you no longer sinned, you would not be righteous enough to merit heaven. Thus, we need Jesus' blood and we need His righteousness. Both are applied when God adopts an elect child.
And, you are correct, showing off your "ding-dong" (yack, gag, arghh) at a gay pride parade will not gain a blessing. For that matter, Paul notes that those stuck in this kind of life (and adultery, promiscuity, etc.) will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Evidently, they are not among the elect, so it does not matter what they say, ask for, beg for, cry for...they are lost. Note, Esau begged for repentance with tears, but was not among the elect and was hated by God. That is their fate. Sorry about that.
So, if you believe we are saying the Scriptures teach that saved men/women do not hate sin and love to not be held to any standard, you are not reading these posts very carefully. We hate sin in ourselves, but we are not so blind as to think that has eradicated it. We strain and strive to avoid it...but know that it is always squeezing out of our pores. We are vile humans. And, there is no hope...unless Jesus decides to rescue us from ourselves.
And, no, we are not on an "active journey to behave and do our best in this human condition". This remark has the trace element of self-made religion, not Christianity. God will not, repeat not, reward great, honest effort. He will reward RESULTS. So, if you want to be found in a righteousness of your making, I caution you (as Paul does), be ready for utter scrutiny of every moment of your life...and you will lose.
Jesus said, many are called; few are chosen. If He has drawn you (John 6), you cannot escape Him. He will break your heart, confront you with your inability to stop sinning, point out your lack of righteousness, expose your helplessness, let you know that if HE does not do this for you, you will be lost without hope. This is His decision to save you...if He has chosen you before the universe began.
That is what Paul is getting at in Rom. 9. And, if you are normal, you will scream, "That is not fair!". Paul also has an answer for that complaint...Tough. God really is God and He can do anything He wishes...and it is perfectly holy because He says it is holy. Who are you to argue back to God?
Well put and spot on!
Hello CAN WE SIN NO MORE? No, thus my comment about dealing with this human condition in our hell on earth and asking for Christ for forgiveness AGAIN.
I think we are in an endless attempt to not sin and we all fall short and depend on Christ because it is impossible in our human condition to not blow it on some level.
Once saved to me would mean we already at least once would have accepted Jesus as our Lord and Savior for our salvation, at least we are aware of our Savior.
We depend on the love of Christ for forgiveness, but if we lose our way, we could IMO lose being saved if you do not embrace Christ as your Lord and Savior for your salvation, or even worse turn against God.
We depend on God and His son Jesus because we don’t have the stuff on our own to be worthy of God or Heaven IMO.
God loving us send His only son Christ here for our salvation. It is possible to gain and IMO lose that salvation if we turn our back on God, bit like the sinner on the cross with Christ who asked to be with him, it is never to late while alive to rectify our weakness and lack of worthiness regarding salvation and heaven.
You did not read my post very carefully. Your remarks above (and those within the related post) are not the Gospel. You correctly put the "IMO" addition because this is your opinion, not Scripture. Re-read my post.
I think God sent Christ to save us, not deny us salvation. True we all sin out of our pours, but that is why we need to acknowledge Christ as our Lord and Savior and should really try to not live by our sin nature.
We are imperfect, Christ came to save the imperfect and if he can save someone on the Cross next to Him then everyone has a shot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.