Posted on 10/15/2013 3:21:28 PM PDT by NYer
Do you think the poster I was responding to was referring to the conception which resulted in the birth of Mary or the birth of Christ?
Amen!
We remain human after passing from this earth. It is not audacious to say that we do not become Deity. Omniscience is an attribute of God, not humans.
I’m not sure what you were referring to. I made my statement clear and concise. You do know there is a group of Catholics which believe Mary was born of a virgin, do you not?
Most Protestants do NOT honor Mary, which is the point. Why are you in the minority?
The Orthodox also revere Mary, and they have been separated from Rome for a thousand years. Ever think they might not have something to say about the matter?
If we remain human, then we do not cease to be part of mankind. A mother does not cease to be a mother by dying.
Then you are a Nestorian, who denies that Jesus was in fact the God-man, born of the Virgin, body and soul and divinity, inseparable.
Bait Threads...
I read but normally do not reply..
We remain human after passing from this earth. It is not audacious to say that we do not become Deity. Omniscience is an attribute of God, not humans.
While it is true we do not become Deity, we will be given heavenly bodies. Do you know what our heavenly body is capable of doing? I sure don’t.
I'm not sure what your point is.
Who said anyone ceased to be part of mankind?
Mary too was part of mankind and is in Heaven along with all other saints. Since she is human she is not omniscient.
It's the Unseen that is fascinating to me- what with billions of souls and all.....God Bless.
Huh? Mary was a virgin. But Mary was not a deity. Mary was born a human and died as a human. Jesus was born as a man, tempted as a man and died as a man. He did so to save us the horror of Hell. He was resurrected and ascended into Heaven.
Our relationships do not end when we die. That is an inference from our profession to believe in the Church as the Communion of Saints.
The term “Mother of God” is a loose translation of the term, “Theotokos” — God-bearer.
It is more a statement about the One who was in her womb (the Son, who was both fully man and fully God) than it is about herself (no one believes that she is, say, the source of God Himself).
so the Mother of God was stained by sin ?
the Almighty God couldn’t do anything better in the search for the bearer of His Beloved Son ?
why put human limitations on The Almighty ?
and as for dead believers,when does your eternal life begin ?
I will add, of course, that whenever I read threads like this one or see the term “Theotokos/Mother of God” used in a way that is meant to cast glory onto Mary, I am reminded of Luke 11:27 - 28.
Any honor due Mary has less to do with whether she physically bore our Lord and more to do with whether she listened to the word of God and obeyed it. I personally believe she did so in a manner worthy of the highest praise... but, as I am not Catholic, I believe this is a point best left to Christian liberty rather than an essential point of that gospel that saves souls.
catholics only love/use Luther when he’s convenient, and in this case, when he’s also wrong.
BINGO!
we can respect and admire her just like any other saint that we may read about and admire and respect.
i dont reject Mary, I reject what the roman catholics have turned Mary into.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.