Posted on 09/12/2013 5:58:16 AM PDT by armydoc
As letters to the editor go, it was certainly out of the ordinary, stretching to more than 2,500 words and not one of them veering on the irate or indignant. But the missive received by Eugenio Scalfari, co-founder and former editor of the Italian newspaper La Repubblica, nonetheless made it into print on Wednesday on the front page and under the impressively brief byline of "Francesco".
Sorry, Guardian articles must be excerpted
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
Expressing the belief that it was important for Christians to engage in "a sincere and rigorous dialogue" with atheists, Francis recalled Scalfari had asked him whether God forgave those "who do not believe and do not seek to believe".
"Given and this is the fundamental thing that God's mercy has no limits, if He is approached with a sincere and repentant heart," the pope wrote, "the question for those who do not believe in God is to abide by their own conscience. There is sin, also for those who have no faith, in going against one's conscience. Listening to it and abiding by it means making up one's mind about what is good and evil."
So now one's "conscience" rules supreme? What a dog's breakfast! I know plenty of atheists who claim a "clean conscience". I guess they are good to go then? God's mercy will honor their conviction of conscience that there is no God? Does this apply to Catholics as well who have a clean conscience regarding supporting abortion?
See here: Pope Francis' Letter to the Founder of "La Repubblica" Italian Newspaper for the actual letter itself.
Please read the whole thing for context, but the paragraph they are talking about is here:
So I come to the three questions you put to me in the article of August 7. It seems to me that, in the first two, what is in your heart is to understand the attitude of the Church to those who dont share faith in Jesus. First of all, you ask me if the God of Christians forgives one who doesnt believe and doesnt seek the faith. Premise that and its the fundamental thing the mercy of God has no limits if one turns to him with a sincere and contrite heart; the question for one who doesnt believe in God lies in obeying ones conscience. Sin, also for those who dont have faith, exists when one goes against ones conscience. To listen to and to obey it means, in fact, to decide in face of what is perceived as good or evil. And on this decision pivots the goodness or malice of our action.
Also, btw, for the record, here is what the Catechism says about it:
1260 "Since Christ died for all, and since all men are in fact called to one and the same destiny, which is divine, we must hold that the Holy Spirit offers to all the possibility of being made partakers, in a way known to God, of the Paschal mystery." Every man who is ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and of his Church, but seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it, can be saved. It may be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity.
Note the word "can" versus "shall" or "will".
Also see Romans 2:
[13] For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. [14] For when the Gentiles, who have not the law, do by nature those things that are of the law; these having not the law are a law to themselves: [15] Who shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness to them, and their thoughts between themselves accusing, or also defending one another,
I was thinkng that this provides cover for Kerry and Pelosi. It is also in line with Obama’s statement that he believe sin is when “I violate my own conscience.” This belief devalues Jesus’s death on the cross, as now there is no absolute sin or sinner in need of redemption. Apostasy on display.
We make a very serious mistake if we rely on media like the New York Times, Newsweek, CNN, or MSNBC for reliable news about religion. These news media simply dont provide trustworthy information about religious faithand sometimes they cant provide it, either because of limited resources or because of their own editorial prejudices. These are secular operations focused on making a profit. They have very little sympathy for the Catholic faith, and quite a lot of aggressive skepticism toward any religious community that claims to preach and teach Gods truth. |
I knew it wouldn't be long before the backtracking began.
At least they are clarifying that they don't believe salvation is only through faith in Jesus Christ.
Based on the actions of the Risen Christ himself, I don’t see how the Church can see it otherwise. Recalling the Apostle Thomas who refused to believe that Christ had risen until he could “put his fingers in His side” (i.e. I’ll believe it when I see it). Christ did not condemn Thomas, He didn’t tell Thomas he was going to burn in hell. He chastised him and said, “Blessed are they who believe and do not see.” The Pope made the right call.
and?
Atheists need Jesus Christ. Did the Pope just deny Christ?
What the heck does that mean? If your conscience says its okay to kill babies, then it's a sin for you not to kill babies?
Sweet! Non-believers get to come to the party too.
Pope Francis tells atheists to obey their conscience
Alessandro Speciale - RNS - Sep 11, 2013
http://www.religionnews.com/2013/09/11/pope-francis-tells-atheists-to-obey-their-conscience/
http://biblehub.com/jeremiah/17-9.htm
http://biblehub.com/hebrews/11-6.htm
I have had a very bad feeling about this guy-— I think we are in trouble.
It also surprises me that our Catholic friends are not discussing this story: Catholic priests may be allowed to marry amid Papal changes. There appear to be great changes afoot, some of which may not be welcome to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.