Replies

To: vladimir998

Therefore, Simon was not ALREADY called Peter when those events unfolded.

So you are trying to claim that the writer, after an event (Duh! when else!!), would FAIL to provide the correct information about what took place?

379 posted on 09/04/2013 4:45:48 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)

To: Elsie

“So you are trying to claim that the writer, after an event (Duh! when else!!), would FAIL to provide the correct information about what took place?”

Nope. No incorrect information was provided. Simon was called Peter - just not at the time when the events unfolded. Hence, John 1:42. Ever read it?

388 posted on 09/04/2013 8:41:25 PM PDT by vladimir998

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794