I can see you’ve been through this.
What % of those lines u cite are with OT priests/rabbis?
These men are promoting absurd, vainglorious ‘worship’(albeit they aren’t in a ‘sanctuary’, or are they-was a Novus Ordo rite said here afterward?) whereas Our Lord said His House was one of prayer.
I gotta go find that OT line someday (hey I read the whole OT once!) where it was given the noise of women walking loudly in the Temple had correspondence to strife in Judea.
Then there’s always this which it seems u hang onto but a couple OT lines:
Holy Laughter Chaos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn6FF5nhTSs
I haven’t posted in FR in religion forum for ages and I’m thinking I remember why.
Sorry coming back apparently late here.
pls see I’ve done a post (#27) and hope not to get this into a laughter thread.
Mrs Don-o, steve86 has amply answered but the assembled public dancing is below a bishop’s office. In this context they are demonstrating their ‘office’. That they are corresponding to youth who doubtlessly can’t easily distinguish sensuality from piety can easily be posited.
Their idea of gravity in worship is wrong should they think they have to right ANYTHING by this behavior. They are at least poor examples.
I very much agree w/ steve86 that should this be anything near (in physical place /time) a professed sacred rite it is plainly sinful, a violation of the solemnity demanded with Our Lord saying His House was one of PRAYER.
“These men are promoting absurd, vainglorious ‘worship’(albeit they aren’t in a ‘sanctuary’, or are they-was a Novus Ordo rite said here afterward?) whereas Our Lord said His House was one of prayer.”
When David danced before the Lord, it was not in a house of worship.
I have no use for any faith that denies the blessings he made.
There is a reason GOD rejoices when sinners repent.
There is a reason saints sing songs of triumph in the Hebrew Scriptures and in heaven.