Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998
That is an illogical leap to say the least. My point was proven already. The Apostles never used a Bible as we know it. They had only the OT. That is irrefutable.

It is "illogical" to say that the teachings of Jesus Christ revealed to New Testament prophets were preserved in sacred Scripture in the same manner as the prophets of the Old Testament were? Of course the Apostles never used a Bible as we know it, who ever said they did? They COULDN'T have, could they? Yet, the "noble Bereans" were commended because they "searched the Scriptures daily" to ensure what the Apostles were preaching was true. Now what "scriptures" could Paul have been speaking of?

109 posted on 07/27/2013 3:42:30 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: boatbums

It is illogical to say they had the Bible when they didn’t.


111 posted on 07/27/2013 4:39:49 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson