Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Does the Bible Say We Should Pray to Dead Saints?
catholic-convert ^ | July 11, 2012 | Steve Ray

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:02:43 PM PDT by NYer

Are saints who have physically died “dead saints” or are they alive with God?

A friend named Leonard Alt got tired of being hammered by anti-Catholic Fundamentalists on this issue so he decided to write this article. I thought you might enjoy it too, so here it goes…

Leonard writes: I wrote this note after several days of frustration with people, on Facebook, saying that saints can’t do anything, because they are dead. They seem to be leaving out the fact that the souls live on. ENJOY!

Dead and gone? Where is his soul-his person?

An antagonist named Warren Ritz asked, “Who are the “dead in Christ”, if not those who walked with our Lord, but who are now no longer among the living?” He is correct; the “dead in Christ” are those saints who have physically died. “For the Lord himself, with a word of command, with the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God, will come down from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1 Thess 4:16).

THE CONCEPT OF LIVING SAINTS CAN DO HARM TO THE “JESUS ALONE” DOCTRINE. From some people’s point of view, people who have died are classified as “dead saints,” who can do nothing. They are no longer a force to reckon with; they can no longer appear; they cannot talk nor do other things. These same people don’t want the saints who have died doing anything because this would be another reason why the Protestant doctrine, “JESUS ALONE” fails. If the so-called “dead saints” do anything then it is not “JESUS ALONE,” but Jesus and the saints cooperating. And it would also mean that the so-called “dead saints” are in fact not dead, but alive with God.

Dead or in paradise?

HIS PHYSICAL BODY DIED BUT HIS SOUL LIVED ON. But, are the Saints who have gone before us alive with God or are they truly “dead saints” who can do nothing as some would suggest? Yes, their bodies are dead, but their souls live on. For example Jesus said to one of the criminals on the cross next to him, “Amen, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise” (Lk 23:43). Yes, that day, this man became the dead in Christ because his physical body died on his cross; however, Jesus said that today, this man would be with Him in paradise. He was no “dead saint” because his soul was alive in Christ in Paradise.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob alive and concerned for their descendants

HE IS THE GOD OF THE LIVING. One person alluded to Mark 12:26-27 saying “Jesus is the God of the living, not of the dead” in an attempt to show that Jesus cannot be the god of those who have died; after all he says “Jesus is the god of the living.” However, he left out three people who were no longer alive in verse 26; Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. God said that He was their God. And so does that mean that God is the God of the dead? No; “He is not God of the dead but of the living.”

Abraham Isaac and Jacob are physically dead and yet their souls are alive because their God is not God of the dead but of the living and thus do not qualify as “dead saints.”

Moses was dead and buried. How could he talk to Jesus about future events on earth?

WHEN MOSES AND ELIJAH APPEARED WERE THEY DEAD OR ALIVE? There are those who insist that saints who have died are nothing more than “dead saints” who can do nothing. I usually ask them this question. When Moses and Elijah appeared with Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration, were they dead or alive? “And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah” (Lk 9:30). Not bad for a couple of so-called “dead saints;” not only did they appear, but they were talking as well. The question that I asked usually goes unanswered.

SORRY LEONARD…YOU HAVE A BAD ARGUMENT. Bill says, “As Ecclesiastes says the dead have nothing more to do under the sun…sorry Leonard…you have a bad argument.” He is using this as definitive Biblical proof that people on the other side cannot do anything once they have died. After all, Ecclesiastes does say, “For them, love and hatred and rivalry have long since perished. They [the dead] will never again have part in anything that is done under the sun” (Eccles 9:6).

When a person dies their body is in the grave; it is dead. They can no longer work under the sun, in this world. However, Ecclesiastes 9:6 is not a prohibition against the activity of the person’s soul, which lives on. This of course begs the question; is there any indication of personal activity of a soul after death, in Scripture?

How did the bones of a dead guy bring another dead guy back to life?

Yes, there are a number of examples and here is one of them. Elisha after dying performed marvelous deeds. In life he [Elisha] performed wonders, and after death, marvelous deeds (Sir 48:14). “Elisha died and was buried. At the time, bands of Moabites used to raid the land each year. Once some people were burying a man, when suddenly they spied such a raiding band. So they cast the dead man into the grave of Elisha, and everyone went off. But when the man came in contact with the bones of Elisha, he came back to life and rose to his feet” (Kings 13:20-21).

Using, Ecclesiastes 9:6 as a prohibition against all soul activity after death is to use the verse out of context and at odds with other parts of the Bible. Ecclesiastes 9:6 is referring to the physical body that has died, not the soul that lives on. Elisha, after death performed marvelous deeds. It can’t be much clearer than that!

The saints are not dead but alive in the presence of their Lord Jesus and part of the praying Mystical Body of Christ

JESUS NEVER CLAIMED THAT THOSE WHO HAVE DIED ARE “DEAD SAINTS.” Jesus understood well that when someone dies, they will live and in fact those who live and believe in him WILL NEVER DIE.

Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life; whoever believes in me, even if he dies, will live, and everyone who lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this” (Jn 11:23-26)?

This union, with the saints on this side and the saints on the other side is referred to as the communion of saints in the Apostles Creed. Those who insist that “dead saints” can’t do anything because their bodies have physically died seem not to understand that their souls live on and are very involved.

So, where does the Bible say we should pray to dead saints? I would ask, Where does the Bible say saints are dead?



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ministry/Outreach
KEYWORDS: catholic; deadsaints; doctrine; prayer; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,421-1,4401,441-1,4601,461-1,480 ... 1,621-1,636 next last
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Pope Gregory the Great In his commentary on Job, Book 19, chapter 34, he says that it is not irregular to quote for the church’s edification the books of the Apocrypha, as long as it is understood that they are not canonical.

He then immediately retells the story from 1 Macc. 6:42-47 concerning the death of Eleazar Savaran, who killed an elephant, though being killed in the process.

Gregory’s exact words are these: “De qua re non inordinate agimus, si ex libris, licet non canonicis, tamen ad aedificationem ecclesiae editis, testimonium proferamus” (emphasis added).

The translation already linked renders it: “With reference to which particular we are not acting irregularly, if from the books, though not Canonical, yet brought out for the edifying of the Church, we bring forward testimony.” What immediately follows is from Maccabees.

1,441 posted on 07/20/2013 5:56:09 PM PDT by bkaycee (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1440 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas; bkaycee
Only a Church Council, or the pope, had the authority to determine the canon of Scripture.

And just who decided THAT?

Especially, who initially decided that?

1,442 posted on 07/20/2013 5:59:41 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee
So, if Trent is correct in anathematizing all who reject the Apocrypha, then they have retroactively anathematized one of their own popes:

Do Catholics EVER think through what they believe or are taught I wonder?

1,443 posted on 07/20/2013 6:01:12 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1439 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
The Church did, and does, consider the "deuterocanonical books" of the Bible as the "second canon," just as the Epistles could be said to be held in lesser esteem than the Gospels, even though both are part of the canon of Scripture.

God breathed is God breathed. The Epistles are just as divinely inspired as any other book of Scripture.

If men are condemned in James for being respecters of persons, what is to be said for sitting in judgment of Scripture and being a respecter of Scripture and therefore God?

1,444 posted on 07/20/2013 6:03:27 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1440 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Do Catholics EVER think through what they believe or are taught I wonder?

I never thought about it when I was a Catholic.

1,445 posted on 07/20/2013 6:09:19 PM PDT by bkaycee (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1443 | View Replies]

To: stonehouse01

So; you have data showing this first PROTESTant bible?


1,446 posted on 07/20/2013 6:28:23 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1409 | View Replies]

To: verga
Next thing is you will claim that he existed before space.

"In the beginning...

1,447 posted on 07/20/2013 6:30:08 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1416 | View Replies]

To: stonehouse01
One thing I will not do with it is go along with Luther just because he decided good works are useless for salvation when James says otherwise (Faith without works is dead).

Well; we gonna have to choose:

James or Jesus: "What MUST we do...

1,448 posted on 07/20/2013 6:31:43 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1420 | View Replies]

To: stonehouse01
Luther changed the bible to suit his theology ...

And a MAJORITY vote in a group of men have EXPLAINED the RCC's version of theology.

I've yet to hear the logic behind why a COMMITTEE is more accurately 'led by the Holy Spirit' than one man.

1,449 posted on 07/20/2013 6:34:12 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1420 | View Replies]

To: metmom
*It is written.....* appears in many places in the NT.

I think I've seen something along those lines...

1,450 posted on 07/20/2013 6:35:11 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1424 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
? I don’t think I’ve ever pinged you... But for future reference, sure!

While I don't think I've ever told someone here that I'd STOP pinging them.

Some remarks are just too juicy to be left for others to reply to!

1,451 posted on 07/20/2013 6:37:40 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1433 | View Replies]

To: bkaycee

Me either.

If the priest, or even worse a nun, told you something, you said yes sir, or yes ma’am, and that was the end of it. You didn’t dream of questioning something they told you. The thought of challenging church teaching never even entered your mind.


1,452 posted on 07/20/2013 6:38:34 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1445 | View Replies]

To: narses

Ah...

We can ALWAYS count on you for pithy commentary!


1,453 posted on 07/20/2013 6:38:39 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1435 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Only a Church Council, or the pope, had the authority to determine the canon of Scripture.

I know this is a bit before your time; but just WHO had 'authority' to compile the OT together?

1,454 posted on 07/20/2013 6:39:51 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1436 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Do Catholics EVER think through what they believe or are taught I wonder?

We don't HAVE to!

FAr greater men than I makes up these teachings.

This pot is NOT about to question the potters!

--CatholicDude(One might be named HARRY!!)

1,455 posted on 07/20/2013 6:42:26 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1443 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Do you think Catholics would willingly add or drops books today if Bergoglio decided to adjust the canon?


1,456 posted on 07/20/2013 7:05:09 PM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1442 | View Replies]

To: Elsie; All

It’s pretty weird to have someone ping you to ask you not to ping them, when you haven’t pinged them...

My understanding of “not pinging” is that I won’t draw their attention to a particular thread or post on a thread. It does not include not contributing or responding on a thread.

They can pretend my posts do not exist, in that case.


1,457 posted on 07/20/2013 7:08:38 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacituss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1451 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Their credibility is taking a beating due to their rabid hatred of Luther.

Reading minds is against the rules.

1,458 posted on 07/20/2013 7:18:54 PM PDT by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1426 | View Replies]

To: verga
"Reading minds is against the rules. "

Verga, I think that reading the minds of individual FReepers, is against the rules...

...but of course I may not be remembering correctly and I'm too tired tonight to go visit the page of rules for the Religion Forum...

1,459 posted on 07/20/2013 7:24:22 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacituss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1458 | View Replies]

To: .45 Long Colt

Absolutely. Without question.

And all the more if he spoke ex cathedra.

And it would matter not if it contradicted previous teachings or doctrine. By some mental gymnastics known only to someone deceived by a cult, they could rationalize it and then come to accept it as truth and continue to exclaim that Catholic teaching has never changed over the last 2,000 years.


1,460 posted on 07/20/2013 7:27:25 PM PDT by metmom (rFor freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1456 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,421-1,4401,441-1,4601,461-1,480 ... 1,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson