Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So what’s an Anabaptist?
Mennonite World Review ^ | May 1, 2013 | Scot McKnight

Posted on 05/02/2013 6:40:01 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

I am often asked, “What is an Anabaptist?” and “Who are the Anabaptists?” If one listened to everyone who claimed an Anabaptist connection, it would be easy to be confused. For many today a progressive politics is Anabaptist; for others it means being either Yoderian (John Howard Yoder) or Hauerwasian (Stanley Hauerwas). Fair enough, but neither of them is the full representation of Anabaptism.

So today I want to sketch the view of the one description of Anabaptism that shaped the 20th century the most. I refer to Harold S. Bender‘s classic essay called “The Anabaptist Vision.” No, it is not true that all Anabaptists agree with Bender, and no, some today (like Thomas Finger, in his big study, A Contemporary Anabaptist Theology, or J. Denny Weaver, Becoming Anabaptist) want to frame things in a different way, but it can be said that Bender’s sketch is the most influential view of Anabaptism of the 20th century.

There are three major dimensions of the Reformation: Luther and the Lutherans in Germany, Calvin and the Reformed in Switzerland, and Zwingli-generated (and then finished later by others) Anabaptism. Anabaptism spread through Switzerland, South Germany, Moravia and then into the Netherlands. The early Anabaptist theologians and statements of faith were uniformly Protestant in theology (justification, salvation by faith) yet were not simply Lutheran or Reformed. Their emphasis on adult baptism, upon profession of faith, as part of commitment to be a disciple, and to form into a fellowship of discipleship distinguished the Anabaptists from both the Lutherans and the Reformed, not to mention the Catholics.

Anabaptism is largely responsible for the nonconformist impulse of the church — to be sure, it has some connections to those before it, like the Waldensians of Italy, but the Anabaptists were radical in their nonconformity to the State and to State-sponsored churches — that is, the Catholic Church, Lutherans and the Reformed. All non-State churches in the U.S., and that’s most, owe some debt to the Anabaptists.

They were a courageous lot — thousands were put to death. They paid their life to be nonconformists, and there’s a positive way to put this: they died in order to be faithful to their commitment to follow the Bible, the New Testament and Jesus Christ.

For Bender, the Anabaptists are the full implementation of the Reformation. Neither Luther nor Calvin went far enough. Bender’s focus is Luther, not Calvin, and he cites evidence that Luther late in his life realized his “mass church,” which was basically everyone born into the community/State would be baptized and be Lutheran, was ineffective in transforming the life of the person. The early Anabaptists, like Conrad Grebel, observed the lack of discipleship among the Lutherans of the Reformation. So the Anabaptists carried through the Lutheran reforms and broke with 1,500 years of the church.

Bender is famous for three features of the Anabaptist vision:

  1. The essence of Christianity, or the Christian life, is discipleship — a committed following of Christ in all areas of life. The word on the street in the 16th century — and this word repeated often enough by bitter enemies of the Anabaptists — was that they were consistent and devout Christians. If Luther’s word was “faith,” the word for the Anabaptists was “follow.” The inner conversion was to lead to external transformation.

  2. A new conception of the church as a brotherhood of fellowship. The ruling image of a church among the Catholics and Reformers was more national and institutional and sacramental, while the ruling image for the Anabaptists was fellowship or family. Joining was voluntary; the requirement was conversion; the commitment was to holy living and fellowship with one another. Thus, the Anabaptist separated from the “world” to form a society of the faithful. This view of the church led to economic availability and liability for one another.

  3. A new ethic of love and peaceful nonresistance. Apart from rare exceptions like Balthasar Hubmaier and the nutcases around Thomas Müntzer, the Anabaptists lived a life shaped by love and nonviolence. They refused to coerce anyone.

Thus, for Bender, the focus was on discipleship not sacraments or the inner enjoyment of justification. The church was not an institution or a place for Word proclamation in emphasis but instead a brotherhood of love. In addition, against Catholics and Calvinists who believed in social reform, like the Lutherans the Anabaptists were less optimistic about social transformation. But, unlike the Lutherans who split life into the secular and sacred, the Anabaptists wanted a radical commitment that meant the creation of an alternative Christian society.


TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; History
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last
To: stuartcr

“I’ll continue messing with you until 1600EST today, then I’ll be back on monday.”


Do what you want, troll. I’m not wasting my time with dishonest questions.


101 posted on 05/03/2013 11:18:09 AM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Gamecock

A Catholic ana Baptist walk into a bar....


102 posted on 05/03/2013 11:22:57 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Ex: If Obama were to issue an EO that all church meetings were to be abandoned under penalty of death and a liberal SC upheld his proclamation you can’t see where violence might erupt?
Granted, that seems extreme today but like events have caused wars throughout history.

Isn’t this really what you said?

I answered that I did not know why a govt would do this.
You did not like that answer.

Later I answered that of course I could understand why people would get upset...because they did not want to be killed.

That had nothing to do with the reason, it had to do with the killing.

You never answered why a govt would kill people for attending a church meeting, which is what I do not understand.


103 posted on 05/03/2013 11:24:50 AM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

Sounds good to me


104 posted on 05/03/2013 11:25:27 AM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
I’ll never understand executing people or going to war because of faith.

I may or may not agree.

105 posted on 05/03/2013 11:28:10 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Granted, that seems extreme today but like events have caused wars throughout history.

So now you "understand" but in post #95 you were back to "not understanding".

Will you "not understand" again after this post?

106 posted on 05/03/2013 11:29:22 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Ana one, ana two...

Sorry. Couldn't resist.

107 posted on 05/03/2013 11:31:17 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

??? Sorry my friend, but you are making absolutely no sense now.


108 posted on 05/03/2013 11:38:57 AM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

At least that makes more sense than those other 2 clowns.


109 posted on 05/03/2013 11:40:09 AM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
??? Sorry my friend, but you are making absolutely no sense now.

So, Little Stu...looks like you're back to "not understanding" again.

110 posted on 05/03/2013 11:43:44 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Lx
I’ll never understand the reason to put people to death in the most gruesome fashion. Why Crucifixion? Just kill the person, like the end of Braveheart where Mel Gibson had to be ‘purified by pain’ before they cut off his head. I’d say there’s some pretty sadistic folks running around

Some people think that by suffering you can pay for your sins.

It's not Scriptural, of course, but it's out there.

111 posted on 05/03/2013 11:47:48 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
A Catholic ana Baptist walk into a bar....

Baptists are much more liberal these days. They even wave at each other in liquor stores.

112 posted on 05/03/2013 11:50:47 AM PDT by Gamecock ("Ultimately, Jesus died to save us from the wrath of God." —R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Correct, I definitely do not understand what you are talking about.


113 posted on 05/03/2013 11:53:33 AM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Yes, you are clueless.

And a troublemaker to boot.

114 posted on 05/03/2013 11:54:44 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: what's up

ok, keep up the classy comebacks


115 posted on 05/03/2013 12:03:33 PM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
I have a hard time imagining Christ telling his disciples to go kill the heretics and unorthodox or did I miss that in the Scriptures? Or to join the Roman army to make the world safe enough for them to preach.
116 posted on 05/03/2013 12:07:19 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr; what's up

You already confessed to just “messing” with people. That’s why you play dumb when people reply to your nonsensical posts. I’m not even sure why you’d purposely flutter around from one trollish comment to another in the first place, as you’re not a new member. Your behavior is childish, and I’m not the only one to notice and become frustrated with it.


117 posted on 05/03/2013 12:09:45 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
It's not classy or unclassy.

Just plain truth.

118 posted on 05/03/2013 12:17:58 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

Luke 19:27


119 posted on 05/03/2013 12:19:52 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
I’m not even sure why you’d purposely flutter around from one trollish comment to another in the first place

Little Stu...typical of someone who looks down on others' faith as beneath him.

He toys with people because he thinks they are inferior to himself. In reality he is inferior because he turns from truth when confronted with it. Easy to pin him.

120 posted on 05/03/2013 12:28:40 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson