Ex: If Obama were to issue an EO that all church meetings were to be abandoned under penalty of death and a liberal SC upheld his proclamation you can’t see where violence might erupt?
Granted, that seems extreme today but like events have caused wars throughout history.
Isn’t this really what you said?
I answered that I did not know why a govt would do this.
You did not like that answer.
Later I answered that of course I could understand why people would get upset...because they did not want to be killed.
That had nothing to do with the reason, it had to do with the killing.
You never answered why a govt would kill people for attending a church meeting, which is what I do not understand.
So now you "understand" but in post #95 you were back to "not understanding".
Will you "not understand" again after this post?