Again, Scripture as supreme upholds the magisterium and authority, but not as assuredly infallible, while under both models individuals must engage in interpretation, and there is division as well as unity.
The way souls came to believe on Christ is how truth and authority is established, and the magisterium must not be like the magisterium it dissented from, but look to Scripture as supreme and establishing truth thereby, not based on its claimed charism of infallibility.
Both involve human beings, the infinite through the finite; but the Church is not any one individual (cf: Council of Jerusalem again). Whereas, sola scriptua is each individual by definition, yes?
Scripture as supreme upholds the magisterium and authority
Each individual is the magisterium and authority. This is significantly different.
thanks for your reply.
By grace through faith. Our discussion is not specifically relevant to this I think.
look to Scripture as supreme and establishing truth thereby, not based on its claimed charism of infallibility.
Again does your church holds to a key teaching definitively and absolutely and then say" "but we could be wrong about this."?
I don't think it comes to this teaching based on its infallibility, that's kind of backwards isn't it?
Maybe this is a subtle difference. But I think it is heading off from the topic of sola scriptura.
And the Church most definitely looks to Scripture - in the deposit of faith - just not your, perhaps, interpretation of it, and not conforming to the doctrine of sola scriptura.