Posted on 12/12/2012 4:34:15 PM PST by ReformationFan
Mr. Peterson (c'n I call ya Jess?), there is a simple explanation - only white people are genetically capable of being racist, according to either Al Sharpton or Louis Farrakhan (I forget which, they all look alike to me! . . . . . . that's a joke).
With Jamie Foxx not being white, he obviously can't be a racist or make racist remarks!!
(Do I have to explain EVERYTHING!!???)
oh don’t get me started on the corrupt media, I hate them more than anything else and think they are the biggest threat to this country today.
Without truth and questions being asked then we have nothing but mostly brain dead zombies
Just call Obama “Xerxes”, in the style and fashion of the movie “300”.
>>That’s very weak. You could use it to justify all kinds of bigotry.
In the thin-skinned “everything is a code word or dog whistle” world of American identity-based politics, anything I say can be used to justify bigotry. So, I have ceased to give a rat’s ass what you and your liberal friends “think” I am saying.
You are arguing against the reality of ‘plural pronouns!?!’ lol
It ain’t bigoted if it is true.
Now Bill Clinton has been credited with that but Obama? Nonsense. Every time he speaks I hear a liar, a cheat, a thief, a thug, or a tyrant - sometimes I hear all five.
They are members of a group. And Yes, there are some very good black folks. And they are going to have to decide whose side they are on. And yes, it is going to come to that. And soon.
Which precinct(s) voted 140% for 0? There was one precinct here in South FL where a simple coding error made it look like 141% of voters had voted, but that was just an error in a computer generated report and had nothing to say about total votes per candidate.
Are you suggesting that there was NO voter fraud? Wood County near Bowling Green, OH, had 140% of their registered voters vote. See anything wrong with that? Ya' don't?
No. Against unnecessary vagueness and irresponsibility.
Isn't it pretty much a given that when somebody indicts a "them" the accuser has to specify exactly who he's referring to?
Otherwise, how do we even know if the charge is accurate?
That comment was deleted by the Admin Moderator, so apparently somebody else found it offensive or inappropriate as well. It wasn't my doing. I'd just as soon have left it up for discussion and analysis.
One thing I do remember is the poster blamed "them" for the decline in academic standards. Really? It wouldn't have happened if not for "them"? Nobody White had anything to do with it?
Most indicated their support of Obama, but their rejection of his having any position even close to Christ
That still makes them hypocrites. Obama’s non-denial of being Christ like should remove a true Christian’s support.
Wow! You’re totally soaked in the Culture of Victimhood aren’t you? Who was talking about ‘indictments’ or ‘charges?’ You are arguing against the reality of plural pronouns. Drop your grievance industry rhetoric.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.