Chariots in Red Sea: 'Irrefutable evidence'

World Net Daily ^ | June 7th, 2012 | Joe Kovacs

[dead]

horse and human remains strewn like battlefield wreckage on the bottom of the reed sea

2000+ year old human and horse remains in the sea.

I'm 99% sure that's silly.

[BwanaNdege]

The Exodus was about 1400+ BC, making it 3400+ years ago.

[chicken head]

you seen this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPpKnwh3AvE

[Red_Devil 232]

Yep! Wooden wheels or chariot cabs also.

[svcw]

Not necessarily, it would depend on the chemical composition of the water and the items. There of course would be no flesh but metals, wood or bone could have been reserved in whole or in part.

[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

I have a good dvd on this topic called “The Exodus Revealed”.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Exodus-Revealed-Searching-Crossing/dp/B00005AUE2

[Colonel Kangaroo]

[bkaycee]

I am sure it's just an amazing coincidence ;)

After all horses can probably swim for a mile or so pulling a chariot and soldiers. It was the first primitive battleship.

[Red_Devil 232]

LOL!

[rovenstinez]

This is much easier to believe than the idea that Barry Sotelo or whatever was born in Hawaii. THAT is B.S.

[jjotto]

There’s a reason it’s called “Wing Nut Daily.”

[Tucker39]

I would assume they mean swords, shields, helmets, etc. of the charioteers, and harness hardware, bridle bits, and metal decorations from the horses. That’s just a WAG, of course.

[Lee N. Field]

Interesting, but I’d like to see it from more reliable sources.

[Clump]

More reliable sources?
You mean like the ones who aren't even the slightest bit curious about Obama’s college transcripts or the Bilderbergs?
The media will never report anything that goes against their secular humanists religion.

[UCANSEE2]

If the 'reed sea' is an anaerobic environment, it is possible for there to be remains.

BUT... let's think outside the box a little.

Is is possible that after 'battle', that the 'winners' may have found it easier (and a lot less smellier) to shove all the remains of their enemies (and their dead fellow soldiers and dead horses) off into the water ????????????????????????????

Leaving a bunch of dead bodies laying around decaying is not exactly a good idea. Digging a big enough hole to dispose of all of them, is a huge drain on manpower, especially with battle weary troops.

[21twelve]

I'm not so sure if the winners would have worried too much about the losers, and I don't think they were likely to hang around. But perhaps, to destroy their vehicles, arms, etc. I suppose.

If there are actual artifacts, I would hope that they would treat it as an archaeological dig with good documentation, etc. Your theory is a good one, but probably not if they have evidence of chariots and other heavy items a mile from shore.

[Amberdawn]

I know nothing of the topography of the area, but most beachheads are flat or slightly sloping. It seems unlikely that fallen enemy soldiers would be dragged into deeper water, not to mention the horses.

[qam1]

I would bet these things are the result of shipwrecks or raft-wrecks where the raft or ship totally disintegrated or evidence of was ignored by the so called “archeologist”