Seven Differences Between Mormonism and Christianity

mormoninfo.org ^

[greyfoxx39]

Introduction

The purpose of this is to let you know seven

differences between Mormonism and traditional

Christianity (Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox).

Many would think that Mormonism is simply a part of

Christianity, particularly since they are called “The

Church of JESUS CHRIST of Latter-day Saints”

(emphasis added). The problem is that we, as traditional

Christians, think that Mormonism is teaching another

Jesus than what the Bible teaches (cf. 2 Corinthians

11:3-4, 13-15).

The Seven Differences

1. Mormon scripture teaches that all the various

Christian denominations, particularly the

Presbyterians, Baptists, and Methodists, are all

considered by Jesus Christ to be “wrong.” When

the Mormon prophet Joseph Smith, Jr. was questioning,

as a 14-year-old boy, which of these churches to join, he

claimed, “I was answered that I must join none of them, for

they were all wrong; and the Personage who

addressed me said that all their creeds were an

abomination in his sight; that those professors were

all corrupt; that: ‘they draw near to me with their

lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for

doctrines the commandments of men, having a form

of godliness, but they deny the power thereof’”

(Joseph Smith--History 1:19, Pearl of Great Price,

emphasis added, cf. 1:9).

“Behold there are save two churches only; the one is

the church of the Lamb of God, and the other is the

church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth not

to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that

great church, which is the mother of abominations;

and she is the whore of all the earth (1 Nephi 14:10,

Book of Mormon).”

2. Mormon scripture, prophets and apostles teach that

there is more than one god who created this world,

that there are many gods who rule over other worlds,

and that worthy Mormons may one day become gods

themselves. Even though Mormons claim there is only

one God for them, they still believe that the Father,

Son, and Holy Spirit are separate gods who are only

one in their purpose rather than in a personal being

that they share eternally.

Three separate personages--Father, Son, and Holy Ghost-

-comprise the Godhead. As each of these persons is a

God, it is evident, from this standpoint alone, that a

plurality of Gods exists. To us, speaking in the proper

finite sense, these three are the only Gods we worship.

But in addition there is an infinite number of holy

personages, drawn from worlds without number, who

have passed on to exaltation and are thus gods (Bruce R.

McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 576-7).

“Here, then, is eternal life--to know the only wise and true

God; and you have got to learn how to be Gods

yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same

as all Gods have done before you, namely, by going from

one small degree to another… until you attain to the

resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in

everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory, as do those who

sit enthroned in everlasting power (Joseph Smith,

Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 346-7).

“As man is God once was, as God is man may be”

(Prophet Lorenzo Snow, The Life of Lorenzo Snow by

Thomas C. Romney, 46).

“And then the Lord said: Let us go down. And they went

down at the beginning, and they, that is the Gods,

organized and formed the heavens and the earth”

(Abraham 4:1, The Pearl of Great Price).

3. Mormon scripture, prophets and apostles teach

that God the Father is an exalted man with flesh

and bones.

“God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted

man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens! …I say, if

you were to see him today, you would see him like a man

in form--like yourselves in all the person, image, and

very form as a man; ...I am going to tell you how God

came to be God. We have imagined and supposed that

God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea,

and take away the veil, so that you may see” (Smith,

Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, 345).

“The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as

man’s” (Doctrine and Covenants 130:22).

4. Mormon prophets and apostles teach that God

the Father has at least one wife by which we were

all literally born from as spirit children prior to

coming to this earth. Some of these prophets and

apostles have even taught that Jesus had wives

and children.

“This glorious truth of celestial parentage,

including specifically both a Father and a Mother, is

heralded forth by song in one of the greatest of

Latter-day Saint hymns. O My Father by Eliza R.

Snow, written in 1843 during the lifetime of the

Prophet, includes this teaching:

“ In the heavens are parents single? No; the thought makes reason stare!

Truth is reason, truth eternal, Tells me I’ve a Mother there.

When I leave this frail existence, When I lay this mortal by,

Father, Mother, may I meet you In your royal courts on high?”

(McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 516-7).

“We have now clearly shown that God the Father had

a plurality of wives, one or more being in eternity,

by whom He begat our spirits as well as the spirit of

Jesus His First Born, and another being upon the

earth by whom He begat the tabernacle of Jesus, as

His Only Begotten in this world. We have also

proved most clearly that the Son followed the

example of his Father, and became the great

Bridegroom to whom kings’ daughters and many

honorable Wives were to be married” (Apostle Orson

Pratt, The Seer, 172).

“When our father Adam came into the garden of

Eden, he came into it with a celestial body, and

brought Eve, one of his wives, with him. He helped

to make and organize this world. He is MICHAEL,

the Archangel, the ANCIENT OF DAYS! about

whom holy men have written and spoken--He is our

FATHER and our God, and the only God with

whom WE have to do (Prophet Brigham Young,

Journal of Discourses, vol. 1, 50).

NOTE: Most Mormons are unaware that Brigham

Young in fact taught that Adam was the God of this

world. Only members of fundamentalist Mormon groups

(not affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday

Saints) hold to this doctrine today. Regardless of this

identification of God as being Adam, no one denies that

Young believed that God the Father has more than one wife.

5. Mormon prophets and apostles teach that God

the Father had a Father whom He followed as

Jesus had followed Him. This follows from the

preceding points.

“If Abraham reasoned thus—If Jesus Christ was

the Son of God, and John discovered that God the

Father of Jesus Christ had a Father, you may

suppose that He had a Father also. Where was there

ever a son without a father? And where was there

ever a father without first being a son? Whenever

did a tree or anything spring into existence without a

progenitor? And everything comes in this way.

…Hence if Jesus had a Father, can we not believe

that He had a Father also? I despise the idea of

being scared to death at such a doctrine, for the

Bible is full of it.

I want you to pay particular attention to what I am

saying. Jesus said that the Father wrought precisely

in the same way as His Father had done before Him.

As the Father had done before? He laid down His

life, and took it up the same as His Father had done

before” (Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph

Smith, 373).

6. Mormon prophets and apostles teach that there

are many things that Jesus did not create. For

example, He did not create our spirits, nor did He

create Lucifer, nor did He even create the planet

that He was born on as a spirit. The reason for this

is because Mormons believe that Jesus and Lucifer

are literally brothers, and we as humans are all the

younger brothers and sisters of them. We were all

born of heavenly parents, who did the creating work

of their world (not all worlds whatsoever) before we

arrived spiritually in heaven.

“The appointment of Jesus to be the Savior of the

world was contested by one of the other sons of God.

He was called Lucifer, son of the morning. Haughty,

ambitious, and covetous of power and glory, this

spirit-brother of Jesus desperately tried to become the

Savior of mankind” (Milton R. Hunter, The Gospel

through the Ages, 15).

7. Mormon prophets and apostles teach that we

should not pray directly to Jesus. Rather, they can

only pray directly to the Father in the name of Jesus.

Apostle Bruce McConkie said concerning the Father,

“He is the one to whom we have direct access by

prayer, and if there were some need -- which there is

not -- to single out one member of the Godhead, for a

special relationship, the Father, not the Son, would be

the one to choose. Our relationship with the Son is

one of brother or sister in the pre-mortal life.’

Referring to “others who have an excessive zeal,”

McConkie went on to say that they devote themselves to

gaining a special, personal relationship with Christ

that is both improper and perilous. ...Another peril is that those so

involved often begin to pray directly to Christ because of some

special friendship they feel has been developed.

...This is plain sectarian nonsense. Our prayers are

addressed to the Father and to Him only (BYU

Devotional [March 2, 1982], 17, 19 & 20).

A Christian Response

Some Mormons may quibble that some of these

sources are non-scriptural, and are thus simply the

opinions of men with no binding authority. But the Bible

says that if so-called prophets and apostles teach other

gods than what God has already clearly revealed about

Himself, we are to consider them to be false (cf.

Deuteronomy 13:1-5; 2 Corinthians 11:3-4, 13-15; &

Galatians 1:6-9). What difference does it make if the

preceding sources are deemed by the Mormon Church to

be scriptural or not? If this is truly what they taught, then

it seems quite obvious that these individuals are not

teaching the God of the Bible, and thus should be

considered as non-Christian (i.e., they are not following

the true Christ).

Mormons also quibble that the Bible is full of errors

and has been through many a translation such that many

“plain and precious truths” have been left out of the

translation we have today. Thus, Mormons unquestionably

rest their faith in what their church tells them to believe, so

long as they receive affirmation from what is called a

“burning in their bosoms.” Christians, on the other hand,

find no reason to think that many truths have been taken

from Scripture.

Why is it that all the various manuscripts

of the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Scriptures, from which

all the various versions come, are remarkably consistent

with each other? Where is all the evidence that these

manuscripts were cut up in such a way so as to delete the

“plain and precious truths” found today in the restored

Mormon Scriptures? Christians find no reason to doubt

the words of the Lord Jesus when He said, “Scripture

cannot be broken” (John 10:35), and “[h]eaven and earth

shall pass away but my words shall not pass away” (Mat.

24:35). It is the word of God, not our “burning in our

bosoms,” that is a light to our path (Psalms 119:105).

The Christian interpretation of the Bible teaches that

there was only one Being (not a team of Gods that formed

a Godhead) who did the creation work of any world in the

entire universe (not some proper subset of it) (Isaiah

43:10; 44:6, 8, 24; 45:12; & 46:9). Of course other “gods”

are mentioned in Scripture, but they are consistently

referred to as false gods or idols that are not gods by nature

(Ps. 96:5; 1 Cor. 8:1-6; & Gal. 4:8).

(Some Mormons have attempted to support their polytheism by likening

themselves to early Christian fathers and other Christian

theologians in their view of the deification of humans. But

the latter still believe in only one true God by nature, and

hold that humans can never attain the unique features of

God like omnipotence, eternality, omnipresence, etc.

Consequently, Christian deification does not teach that

humans can literally become gods. Instead, it teaches that

humans are “deified” in the sense that the Holy Spirit

transforms Christian believers into the image of God,

modeled perfectly in the human nature of Christ, by

endowing them in the resurrection with immortality and

God’s perfect moral character.)

The Bible also teaches that God is not limited to a body

that He needs to become a God. He is too great for a body

(1 Kings 8:27 & Jn. 4:21-24). He is God unchangeably

from everlasting to everlasting (Malachi 3:6 & Ps. 90:2).

This is why God has a completely different nature from

man. He is not a mere man, nor an exalted man, since He

is not a man at all (Hosea 11:9).

The Bible also teaches that Jesus created everything

that was ever created from the beginning of heaven and

earth (Jn. 1:1-3, 14 & Colossians 1:15-18). Hence,

wherever humans or Lucifer were made, they were all

made by Jesus. This is why Christians have no problem

praying to Jesus (cf. Stephen’s prayer in Acts 7:59).

Jesus told us not just to pray to the Father, but to Himself

as well (Jn. 14:14—Greek says, “If you ask me anything

in my name, I will do it”). Whether Jesus is physically

present or not is irrelevant, since He claimed to be with us

always anyway (Mat. 18:20 & 28:20). Though He

became fully man, He has always been fully God and

ought to be treated as such (Jn. 1:1 & 14; 5:18 & 23;

Romans 9:5; Philippians 2:5-10; Col. 2:9; Revelation 1:8,

17-18; & 22:6-20). Since Jesus is the only Son of God

with the nature of God (“only begotten” in Greek means

“one of a kind or genus”), He is God the Son (Jn. 1:18).

More specifically, He is the second person of God. The

Christian God is more than one person; He is actually three

persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) who are not unlike

radically connected Siamese twins (compare Isa. 44:24

with Genesis 1:26--the being of God created alone with the

plurality of persons that His being is comprised of). There

was never a time when one of the persons was without the

others. They are eternally distinct persons while eternally

inseparable in being as well as purpose.

Your eternal salvation depends on whether you really

know God or not. Jesus said, “[I]f ye believe not that I am

he, ye shall die in your sins” (Jn. 8:24). Please consider

praying to God (Father, Son, or Holy Spirit), asking Him

to cleanse you from all your sins, particularly of following

another god and another Jesus, and then repent from those

idols by leaving the Mormon Church.

Then please consider committing yourself to a genuinely “Christian”

denomination in order to grow in your new spiritual life.

1. All citations to Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith

use the pre-2002 edition.

R. M. Sivulka

[Colofornian]

Nor is Romney the first republican to have switched from pro choice to pro life. You don’t believe Romney? Yes, I know that, but a candidate’s “stance” means something. And in this case it is a conservative, pro life stance.

Besides the Dec '07 Katie Couric interview, let's look at other pro-abortion components of Romney post his supposed Nov '04 pro-life "altar call."

May '05...press conference...he assures Massachusetts that he won't upset what he called "the status quo" on abortion.

My. My. How "pro-life" can you get?

2006: Romney pays for $50 taxpayer funded abortions with his RomneyCare.

Also with RomneyCare, he failed to veto the section where Planned Parenthood would be ensured to have a permanent rep on the oversight board of it...forever...

Then in the Aug 2007 interview with Chris Wallace, he claimed he NEVER was "pro-choice" 'cause he didn't "feel" like he was...

My.

What a confused mass from Mass...

If this is a "pro-life convert," what do pro-aborts look like?

[Williams]

I know this reality will be so hard for you to deal with that you won’t: some of us can talk about present day situations. Romney’s stance IS pro life. Period. Fact.

He IS pro life and supports overturning Roe v Wade, as well as defunding Planned Parenthood.

This is 2012 not 2007. I can answer your chart that deals with 2007 but Mitt Romney IS a totally pro life candidate. You should be happy about that.

As for 2007, I know Romney basically used a democrat type argument in the past, that he personally was against abortion but he would accept that women had a right to abortion. As your quotes include, Romney has admitted that really amounted to a pro abortion position.

Romney is pro life, Obama is pro abortion/infanticide. That really is not a hard comparison to deal with.

[Williams]

To answer your last question, pro aborts look like Barack Obama. Romney switched to pro life. You should be glad but you’re not. I am. Some people can’t take “yes” for an answer.

After you help reelect Obama, do you think it will matter to the millions aborted that you ridiculed Romney on his past inconsistencies?

[Colofornian]

This is 2012 not 2007. I can answer your chart that deals with 2007 but Mitt Romney IS a totally pro life candidate

You miss the obvious: Romney said thruout 2007 that he was "pro-life" THEN, too...

[Colofornian]

Romney switched to pro life.

When?

Romney said he "switched" to pro-life in Nov 2004.

Then he made pro-abortion statements in '05.

Then he had pro-abort actions in '06.

Then by Jan '07 on the campaign trail was touting he was "pro-life." (So was that switcheroo III?)

Both in Aug '07 (chris wallace interview) and Nov 2011 (Ann Romney in parade mag interview) claimed that Mitt had ALWAYS been pro-life!!!

And by Dec 07 he was back to saying 'twas "OK" for parents to "donate" their offspring to "research."

[for statements confirming all this, see previous chart, etc.]

Why, of course, Ann! Why, of course, Mitt! Why, of course, Williams! Mitt Romney's ALWAYS been "pro-life!"

HA HA HA HA HA

[The joke is on you...and on the pre-born]

[Williams]

I’m sorry but your whole approach is moronic. The candidate is pro life. So you will reelect a pro infanticide communist while you run around snorting ha ha about the candidate’s quotes from 2007. How idiotic is that?

You’re going to “prove” that a pro life candidate “really” must be pro choice. Well that’s brilliant. Not.

Ha ha 2007 ha ha reelect Barack Obama, oh I feel so smart now.

[Williams]

Ha ha 7 pro abortion liberals on the Supreme Court ha ha too bad unborn babies ha ha big joke really showed that Romney ha ha.

[Williams]

Have a good night. I’m sorry but it’s sad to see pro life people convince themselves they should defeat the pro life candidate and reelect the pro abortion one.

[Colofornian]

Ha ha 7 pro abortion liberals on the Supreme Court ha ha too bad unborn babies ha ha big joke really showed that Romney ha ha.

Ha ha Romney only appointed 1/4 of Mass judges who were GoP (& who even knows how many of them were pro-life).

If Romney's 3/4 track record continues of ensuring non-GoP judges are appointed, look out!

[Colofornian]

...it’s sad to see pro life people convince themselves they should defeat the pro life candidate and reelect the pro abortion one.

They are both pro-death.

You simply choose to believe the empty rhetoric of one of them.

[Williams]

Yeah its real smart to condemn the candidate who agrees with you.

[Elsie]

I further go the extreme step of not worrying what Elsie says regarding the Pope’s supposed views on my posts here.

Yes; it does seem extreme, considering what I posted to begin with:

To: Williams

Jews don’t give a damn about Mormons, anymore than Roman Catholics do.

Golly!

The Pope should hear about this!!

142 posted on Monday, May 28, 2012 8:08:58 AM by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

[Elsie]

I find their reactions to be simplistic at best. Very child like.

Aw...  shucks...

 

[Elsie]

In that world, people don’t give much of a good darn about Mormonism...

...or any OTHER religions, either.

It's a BIG handbasket, and many are in it.

I, for one, am not willing to let the ignorant stay in the basket without knowing some facts.

For some reason this upsets others.

Are THEY in they basket; too?

[Elsie]

You take every sentence and “disprove” it...

No; I don't. I ask for EVIDENCE to back up the claims that you make in those sentences.

If the individual statementrs cannot stand on their own, binding them together will not make the claims any stronger.

MORMONism is a HERESY.

---

[Elsie]

There you go again; trying to bury someone with evidence!

[Elsie]

...some of us can talk about present day situations. Romney’s stance IS pro life.

While tending to IGNORE the PAST's evidence of a differing 'stance'.

Can we say FLIP-FLOP?

[Elsie]

Can we say FLIP-FLOP?

Romney switched to pro life.

I guess we can!!

[Elsie]

Romney switched to pro life.

Move along folks; no religious convictions to see here.

[GilesB]

My use of the TRUE definition, dear Elsie - put the emphasis where it belongs.