Posted on 02/04/2012 6:53:17 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Very, very good e-mail lists and an internal debate over whether to use them. I'm getting really tired of the ads for Romney campaign trips coming from this list serve, writes one young Mormon.
LAS VEGAS, Nevada -- At Mitt Romneys first rally here earlier this week, there were plenty of hints that the enthusiastic crowd of 1,000 was stacked with Mormons. Kids walked around in BYU sweatshirts, moms chatted about LDS youth groups, and at least one supporter was overheard talking about making phone calls for the candidate as part of "family home evening" -- a weekly family night the church encourages its members to hold.
But while it's no secret that Romney's coreligionists have swelled the ranks at campaign stops from Des Moines to Reno, one question about the Mormon vote has gone largely unanswered this primary season: How, exactly, have they gotten so organized?
"We heard about it from some friends in our [LDS] ward," said one woman standing outside a rally held in a Las Vegas hotel supply warehouse. "We're so glad we could make it." Another Mormon standing nearby chimed in, "Everyone we know is voting for Mitt!"
The secret to the grassroots success lies, in part, in the unique national structure and scrupulous record-keeping of the Utah-headquartered Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. While the church itself is politically neutral, it contains the structural groundwork for one of the most organized and effective voting blocs in the countrysomething Romney is poised to capitalize on.
Heres how it works
In contrast with most other religions in the country, the Mormon Church is nationally organized in a strict, top-down fashion, like a corporation. Every congregation in the U.S. reports back to church headquarters in Salt Lake. Whenever an individual is baptized -- either as a child or as a convert -- local ministers take down the persons name, address, phone number, and e-mail address, and feed the information into a national database maintained by officials in Salt Lake (and only accessible to certain church leaders).
From there, the individuals are assigned to geographically-determined congregations -- or wards -- of about 200-300, which they attend on Sundays. Their contact information is filtered into a local ward list, which is distributed to all local congregants for planning purposes--from coordinating Sunday school, to working out the logistics for church barbeques.
For decades, these ward lists were printed out and distributed after Sunday services, but in recent years the system has migrated online to LDS.org, where Mormons create logins to access the contact information for every fellow believer in the area.
For active Mormons, wards often become the center of their social universe: its not uncommon for members to visit their local chapels three or four times a week for various activities and meetings. Additionally, Mormons participate in home and visiting teaching programs, which require them to visit certain ward members on a monthly basis. In this context, ward lists become invaluable tools for Mormons daily lifeinevitably finding their way into Google groups, listservs, and cell phones.
They also frequently become political tools.
Working the wards
The church expressly forbids using these directories for non-religious purposes, but that doesnt deter many politically active Mormons from working their ward lists to get out the vote. Reports abound of members blasting out congregational e-mails soliciting support for partisan causes and candidates. One Southern California ward received several e-mails urging congregants to vote for an LDS politician running for local office. And in nastier example of the practice, ward lists in Alpine, Utah were used to spread an anonymous smear campaign against a candidate on the eve of a local election.
Several Mormons told BuzzFeed that as the 2012 primaries heated up, they started to see their fellow congregants use ward lists to organize local efforts for Romney.
Here in Nevada, Ryan Erwin, a consultant for the Romney campaign, acknowledged that the candidate has benefitted from grassroots efforts by Latter-day Saints, and said the campaign is proud of their support. But he also thinks the Mormon factor has been overstated.
Mormons make up seven percent of the population here, Erwin said. If you read some of the reports in the media, youd think it was 90 percent its a little aggravating when youve worked for months to build up an organization and then they say, Well, he just won it because hes a Mormon.
That said, exit polls in 2008 showed that about 25 percent of Nevada caucus-goers self-identified as Mormon -- and Romney won that primary handily. This time around, polling indicates that hes headed for a similarly dominant victory, and if it happens, local Latter-day Saints will no doubt deserve a chunk of the credit.
Much like how Iowas Christian home-school vote advanced its own grassroots efforts for Mike Huckabee largely independently of his campaign, theres no evidence that Team Romney is officially coordinating with Mormon congregations. But anecdotal evidence suggests that a highly motivated base of Mormon supporters has effectively taken advantage of the LDS infrastructure to help Romney.
The Colonial First Ward listserv
One of the most illustrative examples is the Colonial First Ward listserv, which consists of more than 3,500 D.C.-area Mormons, many of them young and single.
E-mails obtained by BuzzFeed show the listserv being used frequently as a recruiting tool for Romney supporters -- gathering signatures to get the candidate on the Delaware ballot, requesting volunteers to aid the campaigns Illinois operation, and organizing a get-out-the-vote trip to South Carolina on the weekend of the primary.
The fruits of that last effort were obvious on the ground in Columbia, S.C., where dozens of young Mormon students from Virginia and D.C. were found rallying for Romney at various campaign stops.
But not everyone on the listserv has looked kindly upon efforts to transform the network into a booster club for Romney, and a number of members have e-mailed complaints.
Matt Larsen, a member of the listserv, wrote last October: I know Im probably going to make enemies here, but Im getting really tired of the ads for Romney campaign trips coming from this list serve. The disclaimer at the bottom of every list serve email states very clearly: Items that will not be posted/that will be removed include: promoting your business, promoting political ideologies, and inflammatory comments and rhetoric.
The protests appear to have been ignored though, with members continuing to send out e-mails as recently as last month that requested volunteer help for Romney.
The Colonial First Ward listserv seems to be a miraculous pro-Romney organizing tool, grumbled one D.C.-area Mormon, who is a Democrat. Whenever you get the contact information for 3,540 young Mormons in one place, I guess it has to be.
Thanks E, for your voice of reason.
The rest of you should too by affirming the 1st Amendment. I absolutely and resolutely support the right of Mormon (or any other religion) candidates to run for office. I dont care what crazy religious beliefs they may have - I support their right to run for office, and/or vote any way they wish, for whatever reason.
- - - - —
Hogwash. You have been on here claiming we are unamerican for refusing to vote for Romney for whatever reason we choose.
No one here has said Mormons can’t RUN, but we do not have to discount or ignore their religion as a factor in our voting.
You are the only one on here claiming that, where is your support. There are still plenty of us on here who don’t support Romney.
Youll probably need to help. These folks are not very cerebral - Theyve been caught on the outside of the Constitution
- - - - - -
ROFL. This from a guy who doesn’t even understand what the Constitution says.
So, how are we outside the Constitution? Prove it . You keep making this same asinine statement when it simply is not true and our posts have proved you wrong.
It is your intolerant friends who ignore the Constitution.
- - - -
No, it is you who is reading into the Constitution something that isn’t there, you twit.
Again, show me where anyone has said Mormons (or any other religion) cannot run for office?
Give me the links. You keep claiming my friends have, no they have not.
Reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit, is it?
They didn’t say they couldn’t RUN. They asked you if you would WANT them to run. Would you vote for them?
It needs more straw.
I'll show simply that MORMONism is a HERESY that has stolen from Christianity.
Ineed to chase no red herrings.
I don’t believe in heresy, at least not in the way you do. But if it does exist in the sense in which you mean it, I’d say it’s for God to sort it all out, not man. And in case you were thinking of going there, I do not believe the Bible to be the literal word of God.
Always a joy dealing with the folks who posses a self evaluation of their own knowledge and expertise that far exceeds the available data...
Exodus 24 indicates that God dictated the Torah to Moses. The rest of the Bible is inspired by the Holy Spirit to the various authors.
However, one must realize that there is no issue or struggle with interpretation now that the Church Fathers did not wrestle with more than a thousand years and some approaching two thousand years ago.
There is only one modern theologian of any note that could possibly compare with, for example, St. John of Damascus, in my opinion.
Indeed it is. Joseph Smith, in his drug visions, saw wondrous things and created a theology which suited his finances, his desire for power and his lust for women.
Just as Islam is a Judeo/Christian (some would argue more Christian than Jewish) heresy, so is the Mormon faith. Swedenborgianism came after, although it is very much a heresy, does not rankle quite as much. The Jehovah's Witnesses do compete, however.
Don't 'cha just hate it when the battery for the slide-rule dies
LOL. I’m tempted to make that a tagline.
I think it involves the substitution for timothy hay from alfalfa.
Your loss.
YES; I AM 'going there'!
Then perhaps YOUR definition is in the dictionary?
Ahhh!
Someone ELSE knows Goat Speak!
All those Bible dudes were certainly inspired by their beliefs. But I do not believe their beliefs represent the literal word of God. So you’ll understand how amused I am by those who claim to know what is in His heart.
When the quartet of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John quote Jesus, they are lying? Is this for your amusement or ours?
My belief is that they were writing stories, loosely based on facts, rich in metaphor, written in a style of the times. You are welcome to believe otherwise, of course.
Do you 'believe' that YOUR 'beliefs' are inspired by GOD?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.