Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RnMomof7

Non-Catholics who employ logic should not feel offended by these comments. It is not possible for there to be more than one church professing true doctrine if the other churches profess conflicting doctrines. There is, at most, only one doctrine that can be true. Am I missing something?

Of course, a non-Catholic could argue that only his church professes the true doctrine. Such a person could hardly feel offended by those who say the same thing about the Catholic church.


8 posted on 01/02/2012 3:31:17 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
Some additional information for those who wish to look further:

Jewish Advice: Be Proud You Are A Catholic
[ECUMENICAL] For My Non-Catholic Readers
Why Only Catholicism Can Make Protestantism Work
[CATHOLIC CAUCUS] The Church is A Miracle
Be proud to be a Catholic (prominent Jewish business man explains)
Organization of the Catholic Church
[PleaseReadBeforeJudging] Why Only Catholicism Can Make Protestantism Work: Bouyer on Reformation

21 posted on 01/02/2012 3:42:05 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mas cerveza por favor
I would say that the only one who could possibly be legitimately offended here is YHVH, Elohiym. The description of His ecclesia and the testimony that His only begotten Son, Yeshua, is the one and only true Messiah can only be found in one place... in the beginning

John 5:46 For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me; for he wrote about Me. 47 But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?”

Any doctrine that teaches that Moses was done away with, that Messiah came to start a new religion or that claims Messiah/YHVH gave the church the authority to change YHVH's everlasting divine doctrine is out right blasphemy.

28 posted on 01/02/2012 3:45:29 PM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mas cerveza por favor

That’s ok. I don’t need some guy living in utter luxury in palaces, wearing fine clothes, eating fine food, only spending his time with the finest of people to tell me whether or not I’m right with God.


76 posted on 01/02/2012 4:14:17 PM PST by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mas cerveza por favor

They really shouldn’t care. It’s funny that they want to bash the Catholic Church while simultaneously demanding approval.


122 posted on 01/02/2012 4:39:24 PM PST by rzman21 (To know history is to cease to be a Protestant (John Henry Newman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mas cerveza por favor

Protestants, and even Roman Catholics (in Vatican II), other than this pope apparently, acknowledge an “invisible Church” which transcends all human organizations—the members of whom are only known, ultimately by God Himself.

Think about it, are all those whose names are on the Church roles really Christians? Are false Roman Catholics—who’ve been baptized but who really don’t believe in Jesus, or the creeds of the Church really Christians...even though outwardly they appear to believe? Of course we should treat professing Christians as Christians...but, only God really knows the heart. Therefore, even assuming Roman Catholic is the “only true Church” (which I do not), you have the visible Church (all who profess to be Catholics) and the invisible Church (the sincere, true Christians among the members of the visible Church). Persons in Heaven too—whose names and graves here on earth are long forgotten are also part of that “invisible Church.”

So it isn’t perfect doctrine or even the most right doctrine in a Church that defines it—rather faith and trust in Jesus—which makes a person a Christian, and part of the larger—trans-denominational, invisible Church.

As soon as any Roman Catholic calls someone a Christian who’s not a Roman Catholic....they are assuming this idea of an invisible Church.

As to the idea “There is, at most, only one doctrine that can be true” you are missing something. The gospel of Jesus and the purest true heavenly theology are certainly too glorious to be understood fully—in all their aspects. As St. Augustine taught, we apprehend God’s spiritual truths...we don’t comprehend them. In fact all of eternity for us will probably be spent finding new wonders of God’s grace...

My point is this, is that every body of believers in Jesus, that is a Church, is likely wrong about some things, and right about others....and while some Churches are surely more wrong than others—and some have a more pure doctrine than others—we all, as St. Paul said in 1 Cor. 13, “see through a glass darkly.”

If the Apostle who wrote 1/3 of the New Testament can say that—than surely we who’ve come since—including the Roman Church, should also admit—we all still see through a glass darkly. This isn’t giving into subjectivism—its only acknowledging human limits. Yes there are some errors that disqualify a Church as a Church (denying the truths, say in the Apostles or Nicene Creeds for example) but it is sheer institutional arrogance to claim “we are the only true church organization.”

Jesus accepts all who call upon His name and truly believe in Him.


264 posted on 01/02/2012 10:45:27 PM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mas cerveza por favor

Non taken.. We as LCMS Lutheran believe simliarly about other churches, they are all churches but are heterodox instead of orthodox churches.


276 posted on 01/03/2012 6:05:13 AM PST by scbison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson