Michael Rose addressed this topic with his book Ugly as Sin. Glad the Vatican is finally preparing to take action.
Posted on 11/22/2011 7:48:09 AM PST by markomalley
A team has been set up, to put a stop to garage style churches, boldly shaped structures that risk denaturing modern places for Catholic worship. Its task is also to promote singing that really helps the celebration of mass. The “Liturgical art and sacred music commission” will be established by the Congregation for Divine Worship over the coming weeks. This will not be just any office, but a true and proper team, whose task will be to collaborate with the commissions in charge of evaluating construction projects for churches of various dioceses. The team will also be responsible for the further study of music and singing that accompany the celebration of mass.
Cardinal Antonio Cañizares Llovera, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Benedict XVI, consider this work as “very urgent”. The reality is staring everyone in the eyes: in recent decades, churches have been substituted by buildings that resemble multi purpose halls. Too often, architects, even the more famous ones, do not use the Catholic liturgy as a starting point and thus end up producing avant-garde constructions that look like anything but a church. These buildings composed of cement cubes, glass boxes, crazy shapes and confused spaces, remind people of anything but the mystery and sacredness of a church. Tabernacles are semi hidden, leading faithful on a real treasure hunt and sacred images are almost inexistent. The new commission’s regulations will be written up over the next few days and will give precise instructions to dioceses. It will only be responsible for liturgical art, not for sacred art in general; and this also goes for liturgical music and singing too. The judicial powers of the Congregation for Divine Worship will have the power to act.
As is known, last 27 September, Benedict XVI transferred jurisdiction of two areas, from the Congregation for the Divine Worship to the Rota Romana (the Holy See’s Court of Appeal), under the motu proprio Quaerit simper. The first of these areas is the nullity of priestly ordination, which similarly to marriage, can be annulled due to defect of form, consensus and intention, by both the ordaining bishop and the priest who is ordained. The second area is the special licence for marriages that have been contracted but not consummated. These are practices that occupied a lot of Cañizares’ time as head of the dicastery.
In his motu proprio, the Pope explained: “Under the current circumstances, it seemed convenient for the Congregation for Divine Worship and the discipline of the sacraments to be mainly devoted to giving fresh impetus to the promotion of the Church’s sacred liturgy, according to the renewal required by the Second Vatican Council since the establishment of the Sacrosanctum Concilium.” The dicastery must therefore devote itself to “giving fresh impulse” to the promotion of the liturgy, giving it the focus insisted upon by Benedict XVI, including and above all by showing an example. In this aspect, in contract to the initial plans, the idea of a liturgical “reform of the reform” (an expression used by Ratzinger himself when he was a cardinal), seems to be eclipsed by a large-scale project favouring the ars celebrandi and a loyalty to the dictates and instructions of the new missal. It does so without proposing any modifications to the mass.
It is worth remembering, in fact, that the abuse of the liturgy that has gone on in recent decades, becoming common practice, is committed against the laws established by Paul VI’s liturgical reform. It is not therefore the reform that needs to be amended; rather, further study into the sense of the liturgy and its proper celebration is needed and must be salvaged in some cases. It is for this reason that the Congregation for Divine Worship intends to promote the training of priests, clerics and catechists, starting from the bare basics. By following the example and teaching of Benedict XVI, the Congregation aims to revive a sense of the sacredness and mystery of the liturgy.
Some liturgical texts need to be reviewed, because they are dated, as is the case of the penitence ritual, published in 1974. Indeed, in the years that followed, an apostolic teaching, a motu proprio, a new Code of Canon Law and a new Catechism were published. In this and in some other cases, updates will be needed. The idea Cardinal Cañizares is working on, is that of reaffirming the primacy of grace in human actions, of the need to give space to God’s action in the liturgy as opposed to actions which are left up to human creativity. There will be many opportunities to reflect on these topics. The year 2012 will mark the 50th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council and the year after that will mark the 50th anniversary of the first approved conciliar text, the constitution Sacrosanctum Concilium on the sacred liturgy.
OCP = Oregon Catholic Press
GIA = GIA Publications (publisher of the “Worship” and “Gather” hymnals)
They are the publishers of the insipid, pedestrian tripe that 80% of us endure each week at Mass.
Banning those publishers and returning to the Graduale Romanum and the Graduale Simplex would go a long way to restoring orthodoxy to the liturgy.
No, I’m not holding my breath.
From your keyboard to God's eyes, MO'M! When I started attending at my current parish, my heart fell when I saw the big fat OCP books in th pews. I've been to some OCP workshops. It was there that I learned about "Base Communities." What that had to do with liturgical music, I could never figure out, but I sure got an education when I attended THEIR workshop...
I recommend reading “Ugly As Sin” by Michael Rose. He wrote “Goodbye, Good Men” about the decline in the priesthood, then wrote “Ugly” to record the shocking destruction of previously magnificent churches into plain and ugly (and plain ugly) “worship spaces.”
It’s probably called “Crystal Cathedral” because of how closely it is shaped to a real cathedral. It is cruciform, arched, and trascepted. The highest point is above where the altar would go. Of course, it’ll need renovations to create a sanctuary, etc.
GIA stands for “Gregorian Institute of America,” though there hasn’t been anything “Gregorian” about them for a great many years.
I just want to see the “Glory and Praise” books banished.
Michael Rose addressed this topic with his book Ugly as Sin. Glad the Vatican is finally preparing to take action.
Thanks. I briefly looked at their website and could not find that reference.
“Which of the following better communicates the faith?”
Rhetorical question.
;-)
Amen!
Any idea where the church on top is located?
However, if the Vatican is going to forbid putting up ugly churches, it’s also going to have to tell parishes where to find money for the staggering cost of glorious artwork, splendid materials, and a much taller and more elaborate structure. Marble and gold don’t come cheap.
One possible solution: I read about some Catholic parish that needed a new church in the South somewhere. They bought, disassembled, moved, and reassembled a church building that was no longer being used in the North. It was more expensive but also more beautiful in the long run.
When we sing the Gloria again on Christmas the words will be different too.
That’s a church? It looks like a prison.
The church on top in #47 is Old St.Mary's Church in Cincinnati.
I think that at least part of the problem with building churches like this today is the labor cost. A hundred years ago, craftsmen with the talent to do the work at this level were in plentiful supply; today there are still some who can do it, but they are very highly-paid.
They've taken a lot of flak from Buffalo, especially preservationists who want to "save" the church building but have no suggestions about how to do that (or how to fund it, or what to do with it once they have "saved" it.)
With the economy being so bad, the fundraising for moving the church building seems not to be going anywhere, which is a shame. It's a beautiful building and it's rotting where it stands in Buffalo with the roof leaking like a sieve and no heat during the winter.
Lots of pictures in an earlier thread here:
There are many creative solutions that don't involve the Vatican. Take for example Mary Our Queen RC Church in Norcross, GA. As the number of parishioners increased, it outgrew its present structure.
Mary Our Queen RC Church
After exploring the costs of building a new church, they considered moving a church no longer in use.
St. Gerard Church in Buffalo NY
Relocating the 98-year-old St. Gerard Church from Buffalo cost an estimated $15 million. Estimates of what it would cost to build a similar style church at today’s prices top $40 million. You can read the story of this enterprising venture below.
Moving A Church From Buffalo To Norcross
To that end, they have set up a web site for that specific purpose.
NYER when “big one” hit I hope it hit LA church downtown LA that Roger Mahoney build that be cool
NYER when “big one” hit I hope it hit LA church downtown LA that Roger Mahoney build that be cool
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.