In the LCMS, we practice (or are supposed to practice) "Closed Communion," that is, we commune only members of churches with which we are in fellowship. The church to which a person belongs is their public confession of the faith. Thus, since the Church of Rome and the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod are not in fellowship, I would not commune a Roman Catholic, nor would I expect to be communed at a Roman Catholic church.
Closed Communion is not something unique to the LCMS. It is the historic Christian practice. It has its roots in the early church, when, if you were wanting to commune at a church in another country, for example, you would need to bring a letter from your bishop, attesting to your orthodoxy.
Thanks for weighting in. I would not expect my pastor to grant communion to a Catholic, now would I take communion in a Catholic church. And we have very close friends who are Catholic who understand this. But that’s me, and part of why I’m LCMS.
Ann extended comment.
I have relocated to Midland TX and attended the local LCMS church to “get to know” the parish.
Communion was offered but since I was not a member of the parish, so as not to offend the members, I did not approach the table. If and when I join the local parish, I’ll partake.
My position is that people must realize that (1) synodical membership does not provide an automatic “pass” for communion, and (2) the Holy Sacrament of the Altar does not convey salvation.
Absolution is the directive of Christ’s church.
Only in America is this is an issue...Closed communion is pretty much practiced world wide.. Actually to give you more history, those who were not of the church were asked to leave right before the Service of the Sacrament began.. Now that is Closed communion.
But they may join you in your services and pray together? Thank you for that explanatory post 38