Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: re_nortex; jimrob

You have corrupted the context of Jim Robinson’s statement.
The proper exerption would be:

“We oppose all forms of... GOVERNMENT ENFORCED... homosexualism...”

Decriminalization, benign neglect and non-recognizance are not government enforcement of anything.

If Jimrob meant to exclude all libertarian type leanings, then he should amend the statement and then ban about a third of Free Republic’s membership if not more.


44 posted on 09/10/2011 8:12:31 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
You have corrupted the context of Jim Robinson’s statement. The proper exerption would be:

“We oppose all forms of... GOVERNMENT ENFORCED... homosexualism...”

Hopefully Jim Robinson will clarify the meaning of his statement. My reading of it is that the "government enforced" modifier is applicable to "atheism".

I base my contention of this interpretation on the fact that Free Republic is unabashedly pro-God. Thus, it seems to me that opposition to homosexuality in any form harmonizes with the goals of Free Republic.

As stated in my initial posting, I humbly submit to correction if my understanding of Jim's statement is flawed.

51 posted on 09/10/2011 8:26:04 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson