Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
You have corrupted the context of Jim Robinson’s statement. The proper exerption would be:

“We oppose all forms of... GOVERNMENT ENFORCED... homosexualism...”

Hopefully Jim Robinson will clarify the meaning of his statement. My reading of it is that the "government enforced" modifier is applicable to "atheism".

I base my contention of this interpretation on the fact that Free Republic is unabashedly pro-God. Thus, it seems to me that opposition to homosexuality in any form harmonizes with the goals of Free Republic.

As stated in my initial posting, I humbly submit to correction if my understanding of Jim's statement is flawed.

51 posted on 09/10/2011 8:26:04 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: re_nortex

Did you feel that my post was so over the top and against what FR stands for that you had to tag JR?

I was not promoting homosexuality. The article, imo, is an actress’ view of how homosexuals are treated by the Church. I was replying to the article with my opinion that homosexuals should be treated just like anyone with a disorder....not with wagging fingers or declarations of “go and sin no more”, but with love.

If that is disallowed on this website, then I am surprised, and I am also surprised that you felt you had to tattle on me.


91 posted on 09/11/2011 4:35:59 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson