Posted on 07/21/2011 3:09:24 AM PDT by Cronos
THE Borders homosexual community has hit back at organisers of a rally against same-sex marriage, saying the protest is futile.
Albury members of the Wagga Catholic Diocese will hire buses to travel to Parliament House in Canberra next month to stand up for traditional marriage.
But Hume Phoenix male convenor Steve Onley said members of his social support group were disappointed.
The anger stems from people again dictating to a minority group that we cant do what we want to do, he said.
The protest is futile because as far as Im concerned the laws are going to pass, its only a matter of time and people just need to get used to the idea.
It will take a while but its not constructive having these anti-gay marriage rallies because it is inevitable; theyre just wasting their time.
Mr Onley, who has been engaged to his partner Paul for more than three years, said same-sex marriage should not be regarded as a religious issue.
I think religion needs to be taken out of the argument, it should be a civil decision, he said.
My partner and I dont want to get married in a church, we just want the equal rights weve been striving for and to have these rallies against us is really disappointing.
Mr Onley said the protest showed the church was out of touch with society and was becoming less relevant in modern times.
(Excerpt) Read more at bordermail.com.au ...
.....
The protest is futile because as far as Im concerned the laws are going to pass, its only a matter of time and people just need to get used to the idea.
The gays are getting puffed up....
My partner and I dont want to get married in a church, we just want the equal rights weve been striving for and to have these rallies against us is really disappointing.
Sure...
The Bittersweet Victory: Why Gay Marriage Still Isn't Marriage
(a NY pervert's position shortly after Cuomo signed their destruction of marriage act last month)
Marriage without a church or temple wedding isn't the real thing. Why can some people have all the bells and whistles in the church of their choice but not me? Of course, there have been and will be congregations and churches that allow gay men and lesbians to be married in their midst and to bless those unions, recognizing that God loves them just as much as Governor Andrew Cuomo does. But some rich and influential religious institutions are not only free to continue to reject gay men and women as equal beneficiaries of all aspects of faith but will now also rally their congregants to reject politicians who are willing to abide with this extension of secular civil rights no matter how much acceptance there is of same-sex marriage elsewhere, no matter how many wedding announcements appear in the New York Times.
I write this as a deeply religious Christian who is pained that the church that otherwise provides me with so much spiritual comfort and joy will never allow me to marry within its walls. Some clerics may be "liberal" enough to turn a blind eye to gay relationships so long as they do not have to recognize them, much less grant them any kind of imprimatur. And as of now, even in New York, religious institutions cannot be compelled to perform such a simple act of charity.
This Australian homosexual doesn't want a church marriage.
Until "homosexual marriage" is passed.
Then he'll want it all.
Is that like being "miserably happy"?
Only some thinkt it is a waste of time....
I personally think code pink is a waste of time but I fought for their right to protest so in my eyes if they want to make fools of themselves based on their beliefs then I have done my duty and provided them a world where they can make fools of themselves.
If gays want to faggify America they have the freedom to do so as much as they can. Just don’t whine and bitch like little pussies when you encounter resistance. The phrase “not in my backyard” comes to mind. I’m sick of towing the lines for queers as much as I am for politicians. They all walk around with the me, me, me attitude. “Accept me, notice me, appreciate me and appreciate who I am. I’m gay and proud to be woo hooo yada yada yada...”
Hey faggot, get over yourself and STFU! The on;y people that care if you’re gay is other gays and your lover(s). But because others don’t accept your lifestyle you label us as bigots and homophobes when in reality we accept who and what you are...we just don’t want in in our backyard, nor around our children. I don’t bring my sex life or my sexuality to your front door. What makes you think I want yours at mine? And if I did you wouldn’t accept me anyway because I’m not gay. So I ask you who the real bigot is...
I’m a white man who worries about his bills, his job, his family and food on my table. And since the Clinton’s got into office I’ve had to hear about what a racist, sexist, bigot homophobe I am when in reality...
I don’t care about or to know about the gay lifestyle...
Racism is a business that will never go away as long as there are politicians who fuel racism and profit off of it...
bigot? Archie Bunker played a bigot which is why I don’t watch that show...(his acting fostered a stereotype and we are not all like that).
Homophobe? Just another name given to people who don’t accept the gay lifestyle (note: I accept gays, I don’t want to accept their lifestyle but yet I do not judge you either...not my job). Irregardless, sticks and stones... I’ve been called worse...
So with this rant I reserve the right to call gay people ...well...gay. And I get tired of your incessant whining about not being accepted. Grow up. STFU. And stop trying to be accepted and noticed. You’ll get more respect and noticed more if you’d QUIT THROWING IT IN MY FACE!!!
My apologies. Th above rant was just a rant and not directed at any poster on this thread. If it appears so I am sorry. It was not meant for anyone in particular.
Natural Order Heterosexuals puzzled at “Gay Outrage”....
If he wants it all then he need to do nothing more than open his mouth.
Really? What is with one’s identity being your sexual proclivities?
I am a heterosexual? LOL. No, I got this thing about girls.
Nothing against homosexuals.
My thing is while girls drive nuts, I am nuts about girls.
Having “outraged gays” is an extremely dangerous and volatile situation.
This could easily deteriorate into an all out Hissy Fit.
If I am a Homophobe , are not all gays Heterophobes?
They gays are outraged?
Really?
After some gays routinely storm into Catholic Mass and throw condoms at the congregation they have the nerve to pretend to be outraged at a peaceful demonstration?
If gays are outraged and nobody’s paying attention anymore, do they make a noise? What if we’re all listening to the Charlie Daniels Band while they’re outraged? Can we get a bulk discount on hearing aids?
If I am a Homophobe , are not all gays Heterophobes?
They’re phobic of criticism, I say phobic, because people criticize all over America, all over the forums, etc. If I don’t like criticism, I can shut off the web browser, shut off the TV, and so forth, but it appears people with a double-standard wish to go without any criticism of what they do at all. Sorry, but I will criticize the kinds of behaviors that gays use to characterize themselves on a regular basis, just like I have my criticisms of the other sects and cults in Christianity, just like I criticize political ideologies too, dealing with the homo agenda is like dealing with children trapped in adult bodies, can’t take the fact that somewhere criticism exists against them when they can have an option to ignore it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.