Posted on 07/15/2011 1:49:46 PM PDT by Colofornian
In a recent letter to the editor, the author of The right vs. the law (5/26) compared illegal immigrants to the early leaders of the church.
He observed the early church members violated the law to practice polygamy and those men were still doing what was right, therefore there are cases when it isnt wrong to break the law.
This is all true. But then he implies by this same reasoning, illegal immigrants may not be doing something wrong.
This is a false analogy, because the two situations are not the same in the relevant way.
What made the church leaders actions permissible was they were directly commanded by God to practice polygamy.
Having to choose between the law of God and the law of man, they wisely chose to follow the higher authority.
However, illegal immigrants are not commanded by God to sneak into the United States, therefore they have no such conflict between commandments.
There may be other grounds for saying violating immigration laws is not morally wrong, but the comparison to polygamy fails.
Colin Mann
Hillsboro, Ore.
And many grassroots Mormons have objected to the newer Lds "policy" on illegal aliens: Considering The Disconnect Between Some LDS Church Members and Leadership on Immigration
Other Mormons agree with a more liberal approach to illegal aliens. In fact, one late-May letter-writer to the BYU Daily Universe did that -- and it's what prompted the letter we see in this thread.
The late-May letter was from a BYU student from Orem -- see Letter: The right vs. the law...
He claimed that since Mormons disobeyed the law of the land for 50 years (My note: It was actually 80 -- 1831 --> around 1910)...therefore, Mormons could also similarly encourage breaking the law:
...in the case of polygamy, the churchs leaders chose to ignore the law of the land for almost 50 years because they were obeying a higher law Gods law. Letter: The right vs. the law...
Not so fast, claims this fellow BYU student letter writer Colin Mann from Oregon, who defends Mormon polygamy as being God-commanded. Interesting. Two Mormons. Both commending breaking the laws of the land
one 19th century; the other 21st century. Remind me again as to why the Mormons' gods either alternatively oppose marriage between one man and one woman or oppose protecting the boundaries and citizenship processes of a nation?
#1 As the Mormon commandment by God to engage in illegal behavior is so secretive --
note that Joseph Smith took about a dozen years to confront his first wife with a written revelation from the Mormon gods ordering her to go along with polygamy and another almost decade for Mormon leaders to publish it
-- how does this BYU student know that aliens havent been commanded by the Mormon gods to sneak into the United States?
Isnt personal revelation personal to the person being commanded by such gods?
#2 And if this command goes beyond just the individual illegal aliens--
- like perhaps the Mormon gods have commanded illegal aliens to break the law of the land--
- just like polygamy
...then maybe Mormons-at-large wont see that for 20 or so years --
- just like 1852 published polygamy revelation came after it was occurring as early as 1831!
From the letter-to-the-editor: However, illegal immigrants are not commanded by God to sneak into the United States, therefore they have no such conflict between commandments.
Again, to reiterate how does this letter writer know this when his leaders have already allowed for a conflict between commandments?
Mormon leaders tell their faithful not to abortion unless and then give a LOT of exceptions. One of those exceptions is if the Mormon god(s) tell(s) a person to go ahead & dismember that baby limb by limb. Isnt that a conflict tween the general Mormon edict not to abort but if youve prayed about, hey, why not?
Official Mormon exception for abortion: Abortion is a most serious matter and should be considered only after the persons involved have consulted with their local church leaders and feel through personal prayer that their decision is correct.
Source: Lds.org PR section: Abortion [& LDS official position]
Sounds like pro-choice (pro-decision) theology to me! Why dont Mormons allow similar pro-choice theology for illegal aliens? If a Mormon illegal alien wants to pray about if its OK to sneak into the U.S., hey, why not?
Q #1 If all Mormons were "directly commanded by God to practice polygamy," why didn't they (in the 19th century)? [The majority of Mormon men didn't -- even between the very public Mormon polygamy years of 1852-1890...were these Mormon men directly disobeying the Mormon gods?]
Q #2 If they were "directly commanded by God to practice polygamy," why did it take 21 years from when Joseph Smith initially began the practice (1831) for them to go public with a written commandment (1852)? [The Mormons were forced to go public with a written doctrine after Gunnison's book was published the same year]
Q #3 The Mormon gods could call polygamy an "abomination" in the Book of Mormon; and then command them to practice it from 1831-1890; and then tell them to go underground with it for a while -- but still secretly practice it; and then ex-communicate people for practicing it; doesn't that mean the Mormon gods could re-institute polygamy tomorrow?
Q #4 Isn't Lds "apostle" Bruce R. McConkie on record saying the Mormon god will bring back polygamy -- and command Mormons to once again practice it? [See p. 578, Mormon Doctrine, 1966 version] Why can't the Mormon gods make up their minds if they want guys to have a lot of wives or not?
Q #5 What would a lot of contemporary Mormon women feel about having to practice polygamy in the future? We know for 40% of their parents and grandparents who answered a 1963 survey, it would have been an "easy enough" transition. [I wonder how many of those 40% were men?]
Here's the survey I'm referencing: "Another survey taken in the 1960s found that not only do contemporary church members overwhelmingly disapprove of polygamy but only two in five said they would enter the principle if commanded by the prophets." [B. Carmon Hardy, Solemn Covenant, p. 339, citing survey published in 1963 by John R. Christiansen, "Contemporary Mormons' Attitudes Toward Polygamous Practices," Journal of Marriage and Family 25 (May 1963): pp. 167-170)].
Hmmmmmmmm
12. We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.
Even their AoF is like jello nailed to the wall.
Having a nice Friday Three-Minutes-Hate ?
Having to choose between the law of God and the law of man, they wisely chose to follow the higher authority.
Colofornian, you better be careful what you post!
It appears that I need remind you that Mormon Church leaders were directly commanded by God to form their version of the Klu Klux Klan (a.k.a. Army of Israel, United Brothers of Gideon, Danites, Nauvoo Legion, and Mormon Militia) and then practice the divinely ordained rites of purification (a.k.a. Blood Atonement), wherein individuals who spake ill of the Saints were used up (i.e. murdered), and their consecrated goods (i.e. personal property) were taken for the benefit of god's chosen (i.e. stolen by the Saints).
Having to choose between the law of God and the law of man, the Saints again may wisely choose to follow the higher authority.
Twice...
MORMON 'leaders' are spineless weasels!
~ Wilford Woodruff, 4th LDS President
THE BOOK OF JACOB
THE BROTHER OF NEPHICHAPTER 224 Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the Lord.
25 Wherefore, thus saith the Lord, I have led this people forth out of the land of Jerusalem, by the power of mine arm, that I might raise up unto me a righteous branch from the fruit of the loins of Joseph.
26 Wherefore, I the Lord God will not suffer that this people shall do like unto them of old.
27 Wherefore, my brethren, hear me, and hearken to the word of the Lord: For there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife; and concubines he shall have none;
28 For I, the Lord God, delight in the chastity of women. And whoredoms are an abomination before me; thus saith the Lord of Hosts.
29 Wherefore, this people shall keep my commandments, saith the Lord of Hosts, or cursed be the land for their sakes.
30 For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me, I will command my people; otherwise they shall hearken unto these things.
31 For behold, I, the Lord, have seen the sorrow, and heard the mourning of the daughters of my people in the land of Jerusalem, yea, and in all the lands of my people, because of the wickedness and abominations of their husbands.
32 And I will not suffer, saith the Lord of Hosts, that the cries of the fair daughters of this people, which I have led out of the land of Jerusalem, shall come up unto me against the men of my people, saith the Lord of Hosts.
Or even HERE:
1 Timothy 3:2-3
2. Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach,
3. not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money.1 Timothy 3:12
A deacon must be the husband of but one wife and must manage his children and his household well.Titus 1:6
An elder must be blameless, the husband of but one wife, a man whose children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient.
THE
DOCTRINE AND COVENANTS
OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSSECTION 1325157, Emma Smith is counseled (commanded) to be faithful and true; 5866, Laws governing the plurality of wives are set forth.51 Verily, I say unto you: A commandment I give unto mine handmaid, Emma Smith, your wife, whom I have given unto you, that she stay herself and partake not of that which I commanded you to offer unto her; for I did it, saith the Lord, to aprove you all, as I did Abraham, and that I might require an offering at your hand, by covenant and sacrifice.52 And let mine handmaid, Emma Smith, areceive all those that have been given unto my servant Joseph, and who are virtuous and pure before me; and those who are not pure, and have said they were pure, shall be destroyed, saith the Lord God.53 For I am the Lord thy God, and ye shall obey my voice; and I give unto my servant Joseph that he shall be made ruler over many things; for he hath been afaithful over a few things, and from henceforth I will strengthen him.55 But if she will not abide this commandment, then shall my servant Joseph do all things for her, even as he hath said; and I will bless him and multiply him and give unto him an ahundredfold in this world, of fathers and mothers, brothers and sisters, houses and lands, wives and children, and crowns of beternal lives in the eternal worlds.
Maam; you have us ALL wrong!
Just because we spend a year or so; going from door to door; trying to explain why CHRISTIANITY is not correct: that don't mean we HATE them!
Inasmuch as laws have been enacted by Congress forbidding plural marriage ... I hereby declare my intention to submit to those laws...
~ Wilford Woodruff, 4th LDS President
Ha Ha Ha ... the Joke's on you ... Ha Ha Ha
Neither Wilford nor any other member of the ruling members of the Saints ever intended to live up to the terms of the Manifesto. Thus, it was necessary for the U.S. to again threaten to dissolve the Mormon Church as a criminal enterprise, and it was necessary for the Saints to enact the Second ("this time we really mean it") Manifesto ... which also went unenforced until 1923 ... which coincidentally was the same year the FLDS broke away from the main clan.
Therefore, it can be rightfully claimed that Wilford was a spineless weasel. A sneaky, lying, underhanded, and unprincipled weasel ... yes. Spineless ... not so much.
Illegal Immigration and Polygamy are flawed for identical reasons:
They are both:
Against Cultural Norms.
They are against the law.
There is no justification for them.
Both have dilutive qualities:
Polygamy dilutes marriage
Illegal Immigration dilutes Nationality.
It’s too easy to find actual comparisons that are analogous...
They are both ambiguous relationships.
One to a country and another to a wife.
They both force underground societies.
They force people to live on cultural islands separated by cultural bridges on they can cross and pretend to part of something they are not.
They both give me a headache to think about them.
Hate?
Truth.
x
Better question: How did he get away with it for so long before wife #1 caught on?
How did he get away with it for so long before wife #1 caught on?
- - - - -
It didn’t. Emma knew about polygamy after the second or third wife (her best friend Eliza Snow). She had gone to visit her parents and returned to find a pregnant Eliza in her house in her robe. She pushed Eliza down the stairs according to her report.
The revelation on polygamy specifically tells Emma to obey Joseph. She gave in at least once, but had a change of heart a few hours later.
He did most of it on the sly. There is a very sad account, of Emma at a Relief Society (women’s aux) where she is giving a speech on monogamy and the importance of it, not knowing that at least 1/3 of the women in the audience (including Eliza Snow at that point) were ‘married’ and had had sex with her husband.
What made the church leaders actions permissible was they were directly commanded by God to practice polygamy.
Having to choose between the law of God and the law of man, they wisely chose to follow the higher authority.
__________________________________________
So then why are Willard Mitt Romney and the rest of the Mormonmales disobeying the Mormon god or their “highert authority” now ???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.