Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SoftballMominVA

it makes for a lovely soundbite and for lying about a candidate. it’s sickening and this Catholic intends on telling every Catholic I know about your “on the ground” perspective, if you don’t mind.


42 posted on 07/15/2011 6:50:27 AM PDT by Cronos ( W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie I Szczebrzeszyn z tego slynie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

> It’s simply not a core doctrine of the church.

It is extra-biblical, thus subject to change over time. The Scripture is not subject to any such change.

Only God knows who the Whore of Babylon is, who the False Prophet is, who THE Anti-Christ is.

Yeah, some of the popes of old were pretty tyrannical. I don’t think that applies today. If anything, I would say they need to be more stern and excommunicate nominal “Catholic” politicians that vote pro-abortion and por-homo-agenda.

Also, all churches, evangelical, Catholic, protestant, whatever, must make the distinction between government taking money by threat of force to “help” the poor, and the charity of a “cheerful giver”.

The New Testament does not teach that the people of God must pass laws to compel people against their will, or their capacity, to “help the poor”.

“Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly or of necessity [that is, for guilt or threat], for God loveth a cheerful giver.”
2nd Corinthians 9:7

Besides, the efficiency quotient for government distribution to the poor is about 10%. That of Christian charities is about 90%. To whom would you rather give?


44 posted on 07/15/2011 7:09:59 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson