Posted on 05/09/2011 3:22:05 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
snip
Integration is a little-used term employed mainly by policy wonks. But while it may sound relatively harmless, it generally describes a very serious phenomenon when used in a geopolitical context — the gradual merging of separate countries under a regional authority.
Similar processes are already well underway in Europe, Africa, and South America. And according to critics, the results — essentially abolishing national sovereignty in favor of supranational, unaccountable governance — have been an unmitigated disaster. But the U.S. government doesn’t think so.
In North America, integration has been proceeding rapidly for years. The New American magazine was among the first to report on the efforts to erect what critics have called a “North American Union,” encompassing Canada, the United States, and Mexico. But more recently, the topic has received more attention.
After the creation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) — similar in many ways to the European Common Market that preceded the political union in Europe — the integration scheme has only accelerated. And the bipartisan efforts have been going on for years.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
And they denied, denied, denied this was happening
Bookmarked.
Which is why they wont stop illegals.
Also, why they wanted that highway from mexico up through texas and Oklahoma.
As for integrating the two countries north of the Rio Grande with Mexico, you've got to be kidding. We share nothing with Mexico. We don't have common values, we don't have a system of law common to Mexico and the other two, we don't have a common language. How do you integrate that?
And Obama’s insistence that your kids learn Spanish.
b
Easy, bring in 30,000,000 Mexicans and abort 50,000,000 Americans...
Religion?
Mexico is a sizable nation, however, there can be no union with Canada. It would be total annexation if we joined with Cananda, no matter what the method. It’s population being barely a 10th of ours, it would be wholly assimilated.
That’s what this article fails to mention. there are approx 477 million people in North America. 309 million of which are already in the United States. It’s not like Europe where you have 60 million here, 65 million there, and 80 million over there.
Notice how they arent advocating expanding our Constitutional rights to mexico or Canada.
Good point.
The Constitution would have to be compromised, and that just won’t happen. Not without civil war.
“The Constitution would have to be compromised, and that just won’t happen. Not without civil war.”
The bloody fight over whether or nor our president is “natural born” shows me just how many people are willing to go to war over the written word of the Constitution. Which is: almost nobody. Even the Federal Judiciary is doing all it can to deny any case on this topic enough time of day to move to discovery.
“The Constitution would have to be compromised, and that just won’t happen. Not without civil war.”
The bloody fight over whether or not our president is “natural born” shows me just how many people are willing to go to war over the written word of the Constitution. Which is: almost nobody. Even the Federal Judiciary is doing all it can to deny any case on this topic enough time of day to move to discovery.
Both Dems and Repubs have violated the Constitution to make Obama our President, therefore, we are not a nation of laws based on the U.S. Constitution. McCaskill and Coburn in the Senate proved they can amend the Constitution by a resolution (SR 511). The precedent has been set, and no court dares to say otherwise. Dictatorship, oligarchy? The President is free to use executive orders to deprive us of all our rights since the Constitution has been superceded.
When the mergers happen, we will all owe our allegiance to the United Nations. We will have no sovereignty. That was Obama’s main goal. The only recourse is civilian revolution.
Nobody’s pinged you yet?
Yeah, I remember this from a few years back. Bush and his people were neck deep in it, but claimed that it was only a trading bloc scheme. This confirms what we all suspected at the time.
Canadians would revolt!
Most public high schools require a "foreign language" in the curriculum. Unfortunately budget cuts often make Spanish the only option.
In schools that offer a second or third language, guess which language Latino kids take.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.