Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Sex Abuse Hearing Descends Into `Shut Up' Order and Charge of 'Abomination'
Courthouse News Service ^ | March 25, 2011 | Reuben Kramer

Posted on 03/26/2011 12:59:03 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg

At an intensely combative and vitriolic hearing Friday afternoon in a sex-abuse case that has shaken the Philadelphia Archdiocese to its core, a state court judge shocked one priest's defense attorney by disclosing that the government thinks he might be a witness as a former seminarian and could be disqualified from the case. The lawyer, who represents one of three current and former Roman Catholic priests charged with raping boys in their parish, fired back that prosecutors were being "anti-Catholic" and had uttered an "abomination."

Judge Renee Cardwell Hughes told defense attorney Richard DeSipio that she's received information that "might make you, in fact, a witness because of events that occurred while you were a seminarian."

The information "stems from the fact that you attended the seminary with a student who asserts he was abused," Hughes said, adding that DeSipio "may possess factual knowledge about abuse that occurred with that student."

She added that the substance of the claim that DiSipio witnessed something is still unclear. "I just don't know if it's true," Hughes said. "I really don't know if it's true."

Yelling and visibly upset, DeSipio demanded that the government, then and there, identify the source of the allegation. "Let them spill it out right now!" DeSipio demanded.

"How dare they send you a letter about that," DeSipio said, referring to the district attorney's office. "That's an abomination."

Prosecutors said only that part of DeSipio's seminary training overlapped with the tenure of a senior clergyman accused of endangering children by failing to protect them from priests with a known history of abuse.

Monsignor William Lynn, now pastor of St. Joseph Church in Downingtown, Pa., is reportedly the highest-ranking member of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States ever to be charged with child endangerment. Between 1984 and 1992, he served as dean of men at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary in Wynnewood, Pa., according to his biography on St. Joseph's website. As the secretary for clergy for the Archdiocese of Philadelphia from 1992 to 2004, Lynn acted as personnel director for priests. He is accused of ignoring reports of abuse, covering up for them and putting children in danger.

"They are anti-Catholic. I'll say it," DiSipio fumed. "[The district attorney is] attacking me as a Catholic!"

The judge rejected DiSipio's claim. "Attack you? You attacked me! You don't even know me!" Hughes said, referring to a prior argument over the necessity of a preliminary hearing, another hotly contested issue Friday afternoon.

"Mr. DeSipio, I suggest you shut up," Hughes said. "People are coming from out of the woodwork [to provide information to the commonwealth.]"

If the government can prove the allegation is credible in 30 days, DeSipio will be disqualified as the archdiocese's attorney.

"You can change lawyers now, you can change lawyers in 30," the judge warned DeSipio's client, the Rev. James Brennan. "[But] there are some conflicts that are not waivable."

DeSipio argued that the 30-day investigation was "really unfair to Father Brennan," given his mounting legal costs.

Judge Hughes was livid that DeSipio spoke up again. "If you open your mouth one more time I am going to have the sheriff take you out of here," she told DeSipio.

As DeSipio continued to argue, Hughes said she might have him "locked up and held in contempt." Instead she issued a gag order, responding to what she observed as attorneys having "gone to the airways to advocate."

"No more interviews with anyone," the judge ruled.

"Does that include the DA going on Chris Matthews' 'Hardball' and going to the New York Times," defense attorney Michael McGovern asked.

The judge responded affirmatively: "I don't want tweets. I don't want Facebook. I don't want IMs [instant messages]."

Hughes said the court will revisit the gag order on April 15, when defendants are to be arraigned. That date also marks the deadline for the DA to provide the defense with the first batch of discovery, she said.

All but one of the defense attorneys challenged the government's amendment to its case, which added a conspiracy charge that had not explicitly been requested of the grand jury.

"The issue here is that if the DA seeks to amend, it has to be subject to some sort of prima facie determination," the defense argued.

The judge found otherwise, ruling that the commonwealth established "good cause" in its pleadings and that "there is no constitutional right - federal or state - for a preliminary hearing."

It was "a technical error on the commonwealth not to charge conspiracy" originally, Hughes said. "Conspiracy is made," and the defendants will not be afforded a preliminary hearing, she ruled.

Hughes said there was abundant evidence to support the amendment.

"I'm the only person, besides the prosecutors, who has seen every stitch of evidence," she said.

Defense attorney McGovern argued that her admission was precisely the problem.

"Your Honor, this is patently unfair!" McGovern said. "You know the evidence. They know the evidence. I don't know what the evidence is! I haven't seen any!"

The attorney said proceeding to trial without a preliminary hearing was like saying, "Let's have a dart game in a dark room."

"What kind of country is this where we have this?" he shouted.

The judge yelled back, baring her teeth: "You sit down! Sit, sit, sit!"

DeSipio agreed with McGovern that their clients deserve a preliminary hearing, which could allow them to confront their accusers.

"There's no witness. I know that they [the prosecutors] don't like that he's in jail," DeSipio said. "This accuser says there was an erect penis in his buttocks."

"Was it in your buttocks, or was it in your anus," he asked rhetorically. "If that question wasn't asked [of the grand jury], and he didn't specify anus or butt cheeks, I have a right to ask that."

"What you can't do, and what I submit they're trying to do, is say just because we have a grand jury, we have good cause [to by-pass a preliminary hearing]," DeSipio said.

The judge also addressed a potential conflict of interest concerning Monsignor Lynn, who unlike the three current and former priests, faces child endangerment charges - not rape or sexual assault. Plans for the Archdiocese of Philadelphia to pay Lynn's legal costs present "a whole array of conflicts that I can't even imagine at this point in time," Hughes said.

"It's real simple," the judge said to Lynn, who was donning his clerical collar, "your master is the person that's putting bread on the table."

"It may be in your best interest to put forth a defense that attacks other people [or the church]," Hughes said.

She told Lynn he was putting himself in the position of receiving "advice from people who are being paid by people whose interests don't necessarily align with yours."

The stakes of this gamble could amount to "14 years of incarceration versus probation," she said.

Lynn, in a calm voice, declined. "Well, I trust these two men." he said, adding that the church hadn't placed any conditions on the payment of his legal costs.

Hughes was incredulous. "You are making a knowing, voluntary and intelligent decision to place yourself in conflict with your attorneys?" she asked.

"I am," Lynn responded, waiving his right to any future appeal based on the argument that his attorneys had a conflict of interest.

"Then we're moving forward," the judge said.

After arraignments and release of the first batch of discovery, which will include grand jury notes and testimony, on April 15, the government will begin putting together a second batch. The government said that batch would take longer to produce, as it will include roughly 10,000 pages of documentation, much of which will need to be redacted.

Hughes said the government must give the defense a specific timeline for the production of the second batch. "There has to be some finality," she said.

In January, a grand jury returned an indictment for rape and sexual assault against one current priest, one defrocked priest and one man who taught at a Catholic school. Monsignor Lynn, the third cleric who worked for the archdiocese as secretary of clergy, is accused of giving known abusers easy access to minors.


TOPICS: Current Events; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,341-1,356 next last
To: Celtic Cross
None of those posts breaks any rule on the Religion Forum.

And if Newbie were a pejorative, we'd all be in trouble.

301 posted on 03/26/2011 9:14:53 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

Good night all. I’m outa here.

I suggest we leave this thread, not feed the sickness any longer - let it die of its own disease.

May God bless.


302 posted on 03/26/2011 9:16:25 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Will a Cardinal suffice?

Indeed, if he's guilty.

303 posted on 03/26/2011 9:16:35 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

If you have a point, it’s incoherent.

Petronski hasn’t posted in many months. His last posts were pretty inflammatory.

For some reason, he’s stopped posting.

Or so we assume.


304 posted on 03/26/2011 9:17:05 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: stevem

Did you read the link?


305 posted on 03/26/2011 9:17:41 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Celtic Cross
None of those posts breaks any rule on the Religion Forum.

I'm Hungry...


306 posted on 03/26/2011 9:17:58 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Ah, but you're making it personal. You are making 'about' that poster. You are assigning a demeaning title to him.

You can't pick and choose.

307 posted on 03/26/2011 9:20:01 PM PDT by Celtic Cross (Some minds are like cement; thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: stevem
Did you read the link?

How about this one? Does it count as "guilt" if priests quit and apologize for their wrong-doing?

IRISH CATHOLICS CALL FOR CARDINAL LAW'S RESIGNATION, FOLLOWING CLERGY ABUSE REPORT

"Ireland’s clergy sex abuse scandal erupted last year after two government-ordered reports documented decades of clergy child abuse and a church cover up of the abuse. Four Irish bishops said they’ll resign for not reporting the abuse...

The article goes on to say this about Law...

"Cardinal Law came to personify the clergy abuse crisis. He was the first member of the Catholic hierarchy shown to have actively covered up clergy abuse. Immediately after the Boston Globe broke the abuse story in 2002, Law refused to step down. But 11 months later, when priests’ records were released by court order showing that Law took elaborate steps to cover for abusers, he stepped down."

I guess those four priests resigned and Cardinal Law stepped down because they wanted to spend more time with their families.

Oh, wait, they don't have any family, do they?

Just lots of young children who were profoundly damaged while in their care.

308 posted on 03/26/2011 9:28:23 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross
As I said, "Newbie" is not a pejorative.

Strike three.

309 posted on 03/26/2011 9:29:50 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross

Dr. Ekleburg and Celtic Cross:
A few enlightening excertps...or precursers of contemporary abominations:

“The Council of Elvira was not the only source of early legislative attempts to curb the sexual misdeeds of the clergy......”

“The earliest recorded church legislation is from the council of Elvira (Spain, 306 AD). Half of the canons passed dealt with sexual behavior of one kind or another and included penalties assessed for clerics who committed adultery or fornication. Though it did not make specific mention of homosexual activities by the clergy, this early Council reflected the church’s official attitude toward same-sex relationships: men who had sex with young boys were deprived of communion even on their deathbed.”

“The most dramatic and explicit condemnation of forbidden clergy sexual activity was the Book of Gomorrah of St. Peter Damian, completed in 1051. The author had been a Benedictine monk and was appointed archbishop and later cardinal by the reigning pope. Peter Damian was also a dedicated Church reformer who lived in a society wherein clerical decadence was not only widespread and publicly known, but generally accepted as the norm. His work, the circumstances that prompted it and the reaction of the reigning pope (Leo IX) are a prophetic reflection of the contemporary situation. He begins by singling out superiors who, prompted by excessive and misplaced piety, fail to exclude sodomites (chap. 2). He asserts that those given to “unclean acts” not be ordained or, if they are already ordained, be dismissed from Holy Orders (chap. 3). He holds special contempt for those who defile men or boys who come to them for confession (chap. 6). Likewise he condemns clerics who administer the sacrament of penance (confession) to their victims (chap. 7). The author also provides a refutation of the canonical sources used by offending clerics to justify their proclivities (chap. 11, 12). He also provides chapters which assess the damage done to the church by offending clerics (chap. 19, 20, 21). His final chapter is an appeal to the reigning pope (Leo IX) to take action. “

“The pope’s response, included in the cited edition, is an example of inaction similar to that of contemporary church leaders. Pope Leo praised Peter Damian and verified the truth of his findings and recommendations. Yet he considerably softened the reformer’s urging that decisive action be taken to root offenders from the ranks of the clergy. The pope decided to exclude only those who had offended repeatedly and over a long period of time. Although Peter Damian had paid significant attention to the impact of the offending clerics on their victims, the Pope made no mention of this but focused only on the sinfulness of the clerics and their need to repent. “

More here:
http://www.crusadeagainstclergyabuse.com/htm/AShortHistory.htm


310 posted on 03/26/2011 9:31:06 PM PDT by 1 spark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
As I said, "Newbie" is not a pejorative.

I've seen the Admin Mod rebuke posters for throwing it about.

Once again, I'm Hungry...


311 posted on 03/26/2011 9:32:59 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: 1 spark; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; ...

Ping to post 310.

Sexual immorality appears to be part and parcel of Catholic priesthood.

Going back to 307 AD.

1700 years of abuse by the Catholic clergy.

And Catholics attack us for condemning it.

It just boggles the mind.


312 posted on 03/26/2011 9:37:16 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Is it up to you to decide what a pejorative is? Is that a special privilage reserved for you?

Regardless of your opinion, it is clear that you made posts that were 'personal' and 'about' another poster.

Here's a couple more.

Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:53:24 AM · 345 of 1,180 Dr. Eckleburg to Natural Law You began this foolishness. You can end it any time. So how long have you been a florist?

Once again, you are making it 'about' another poster in a demeaning way.

----------------------------

Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:21:02 PM · 3,002 of 3,390 Dr. Eckleburg to MarkBsnr You really don't know, do you? lol. Mark, you write with great authority.

---------------------------

All emphasis mine. Goodnight.

313 posted on 03/26/2011 9:37:45 PM PDT by Celtic Cross (Some minds are like cement; thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Protestants have always been the majority religion in the United States. Today the country is still over 50% Protestant while 24% are Roman Catholic.

But today even the individual denomination of "Evangelical" Protestant outnumbers Roman Catholics at 26%.

CATHOLIC TRADITION FADING IN U.S.

"Evangelical Christianity has become the largest religious tradition in this country, supplanting Roman Catholicism, which is slowly bleeding members, according to a survey released yesterday by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.

Evangelical Protestants outnumber Catholics by 26.3 percent (59 million) to 24 percent (54 million) of the population, according to the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey, a massive 45-question poll conducted last summer of more than 35,000 American adults.

“There is no question that the demographic balance has shifted in past few decades toward evangelical churches,” said Greg Smith, a research fellow at the Pew Forum. “They are now the mainline of American Protestantism.”


314 posted on 03/26/2011 9:41:38 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81; Gamecock; metmom; RnMomof7
He and I sparred from time to time, but I respected him.

What did you and Petronski "spar" over?

315 posted on 03/26/2011 9:44:06 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: WPaCon; Alex Murphy

I’m not amused and I’m not Alex Murphy.


316 posted on 03/26/2011 9:45:27 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Try translating "Eckleburg" into English from it's colloquial Dutch some time.

Nice. This from someone whose handle is "muawiyah."

317 posted on 03/26/2011 9:46:17 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Protestants have always been the majority religion in the United States.

Sure, if you count all the denominations as one body. Do you really want to be lumped in with the Unitarians?

318 posted on 03/26/2011 9:46:38 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
What did you and Petronski "spar" over?

Over how much pity we should have for anti-Catholic bigots.

319 posted on 03/26/2011 9:48:25 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; muawiyah
Nice. This from someone whose handle is "muawiyah."

He explains it on his homepage.

320 posted on 03/26/2011 9:53:25 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,341-1,356 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson