The judge ruled on a contract signed between two consenting parties. The contract they signed specified that disputes would be resolved according to Sharia Law.
It really has nothing to do with Islam.
It's a simple case of enforcement of a contract.
>>> Don't sign a contract that you do not wish to be bound by.
WTF!!
But under the Constitution, inhumanity to people is not allowed, no matter if agreed to by victim.
Also, contracts are invalid if they deny inalienable right of person....no one, not even a person is allowed to remove their inalienable rights—to life, etc. Those rights are issued by God and no one is allowed to remove them....even by contract....That is why the US has been so unique. There was Objective Truth based on Natural Law Theory and God’s Law.
It takes a special talent to play this Emperor's New Clothes nonsense of yours and pretend reality doesn't exist.
"First, the camel's nose under the tent; then; his filthy derriere."