To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
A remarkably stupid post by a remarkably ignorant Catholic. Anyone who has spent even the smallest amount of time studying scripture will know how Scripture came to be. This is rubbish. All Christian denominations, with the exception of the usual fringe, understand and recognize which books and included and, more importantly, why.
6 posted on
01/23/2011 5:25:38 AM PST by
April Lexington
(Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: April Lexington
"All Christian denominations, with the exception of the usual fringe, understand and recognize which books and included and, more importantly, why." How do they draw a logical conclusion as regards which books are inspired?
11 posted on
01/23/2011 5:35:59 AM PST by
GonzoII
(Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
To: April Lexington
So can you say why? Can you give this reasoned, informed, intelligent debate? “Just because” and “Everybody knows”, don’t qualify.
26 posted on
01/23/2011 7:07:26 AM PST by
tiki
To: April Lexington
You wrote:
“All Christian denominations, with the exception of the usual fringe, understand and recognize which books and included and, more importantly, why.”
Really? So, since the Calvinists and Orthodox disagree on the canon, which one of those two is the “usual fringe”?
27 posted on
01/23/2011 7:13:02 AM PST by
vladimir998
(Copts, Nazis, Franks and Beans - what a public school education puts in your head.)
To: April Lexington; St_Thomas_Aquinas
And how do you, April Lexington, think scripture came to be? We’re talking about Christian scripture of course right from the Septuagint to the 4 gospels to the Shepherd of Hermas and the Didache.
31 posted on
01/23/2011 7:21:16 AM PST by
Cronos
(Bobby Jindal 2012)
To: April Lexington
" Anyone who has spent even the smallest amount of time studying scripture will know how Scripture came to be." This is an incredibly ignorant rebuttal. On what grounds were the books of the Bible canonized when there were literally hundreds of contemporaneous works authored my many eye witnesses, some intimates of Christ himself, rejected. How did Luther decide that the preexisting Canon was flawed and determine that some books should be eliminated?
To: April Lexington
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
To: April Lexington
A remarkably stupid post by a remarkably ignorant Catholic. Anyone who has spent even the smallest amount of time studying scripture will know how Scripture came to be. This is rubbish. All Christian denominations, with the exception of the usual fringe, understand and recognize which books and included and, more importantly, why. 8-) Are you aware that Protestants account for 25% of all Christians? (Orthodox, 25%. Catholics, 50%).
If we're going to count noses in the search for truth, only 25% of Christians accept Luther's canon of Scripture.
To: April Lexington
All Christian denominations, with the exception of the usual fringe, understand and recognize which books and included and, more importantly, why. Here's another request for a more extensive explication of this rather smug statement.
62 posted on
01/23/2011 8:20:06 AM PST by
don-o
(He will not share His glory; and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson