Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HossB86; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; count-your-change; ...

The term *Mother of God* is at the very least deceitful.

Mother of Jesus is accurate and correct and gives no false impressions about who she is and what her role in God’s plan of redemption is.

But that clearly is the problem. Catholics have, over the centuries, elevated her and given her characteristics and accolades that properly belong to only God Himself. It gives the clear impression that the whole end of this Mary stuff is to elevate her to godhood. What better way to do that than claim that she’s God’s mother.

That elevates Mary to God’s place and diminishes God to the role of a lesser being than Mary.


1,317 posted on 12/20/2010 9:16:48 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1274 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

The term *Mother of God* is at the very least deceitful.

Mother of Jesus is accurate and correct and gives no false impressions about who she is and what her role in God’s plan of redemption is.

But that clearly is the problem. Catholics have, over the centuries, elevated her and given her characteristics and accolades that properly belong to only God Himself. It gives the clear impression that the whole end of this Mary stuff is to elevate her to godhood. What better way to do that than claim that she’s God’s mother.

That elevates Mary to God’s place and diminishes God to the role of a lesser being than Mary.


ABSOLUTELY INDEED.


1,319 posted on 12/20/2010 9:23:37 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1317 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
The term *Mother of God* is at the very least deceitful. Mother of Jesus is accurate and correct and gives no false impressions about who she is and what her role in God’s plan of redemption is. But that clearly is the problem. Catholics have, over the centuries, elevated her and given her characteristics and accolades that properly belong to only God Himself. It gives the clear impression that the whole end of this Mary stuff is to elevate her to godhood. What better way to do that than claim that she’s God’s mother. That elevates Mary to God’s place and diminishes God to the role of a lesser being than Mary.

I think you are right about this. What is probably not discussed is that the divinity of Jesus was not based on Mary's status. What I mean is that, other than being a virgin and from the lineage of King David, Mary had nothing to do with the fact that Jesus was Almighty God. He always was and always will be God and he took on flesh - incarnate - by the same way every other person does, with the exception of his having a human biological father.

1,322 posted on 12/20/2010 9:31:27 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1317 | View Replies ]

To: metmom; HossB86; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; ...
The term *Mother of God* is at the very least deceitful.

Just perhaps, it may be the term "Mary" which is deceitful... If it walks as a goddess, talks like a goddess... etc. ...Observing the holy days of the queen of heaven and her son (including weeping for Tammuz), Observing her husband's sabbath... While the Sabbaths and Holy Days of the Father go wanting (every single one of them).

Just sayin...

1,385 posted on 12/21/2010 12:56:11 AM PST by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson