To: Cronos
con substaniation /Consubstantiation
Yea that is a gigantic typing error.. going to hell for sure
Now one more time..is the spiritual less REAL than the physical?
546 posted on
12/17/2010 8:38:51 AM PST by
RnMomof7
(Gal 4:16 asks "Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?")
To: RnMomof7
Now one more time..is the spiritual less REAL than the physical? One of the most unlikeable things about a post like that is the arrogant, pedantic nature of the thing. "Now, one more time..." -- anyone reading that would be tempted to say, "A million more times, who cares?" No one answers to a poster who "demands" an answer, as though it were some authority speaking.
547 posted on
12/17/2010 8:45:15 AM PST by
Judith Anne
(Holy Mary, Mother of God, please pray for us sinners now, and at the hour of our death.)
To: RnMomof7; Belteshazzar; xone
Actually, it's not spelling ---> you said that
RNMomof7: Lutherans do not believe in transubstantiation the physical stays the physical... I understand their teaching of con substaniation
1.it is properly referred to as Consubstantiation
2.
You just revealed that you do not know anything about Lutherans if you say you"understand THEIR teaching of consubstantion". The Lutherans as represented here by the LCMS folks do NOT believe in consubstantiation.
They believe in the SAcramental Union
585 posted on
12/17/2010 1:58:14 PM PST by
Cronos
(Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson