Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: blasater1960

>> Future yes, but not about Jesus. You have to read the links I provide. Here is another:<<

Hey thanks! That helped me a lot. I have always had a struggle with exactly who was being talked about regarding who they were mourning for. I knew it had to be a future event but the normal Christian reference to Jesus was somewhat troubling. That link cleared it up pretty well for me. I appreciate your input.


167 posted on 12/12/2010 7:35:02 PM PST by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear

Sure thing FRiend


168 posted on 12/12/2010 7:36:26 PM PST by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: CynicalBear; blasater1960
the normal Christian reference to Jesus was somewhat troubling. That link cleared it up pretty well for me. I appreciate your input.

Are you saying you prefer the rabbinic Jewish explanation over and against the inspired NT interpretation given to us by the apostle John?

171 posted on 12/12/2010 7:57:47 PM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- like crack for the eschatologically naive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson