Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.
Click on my profile page for more guidelines to the Religion Forum.
I already know the rules. That doesn’t make a lie any less of a lie. The simple fact is that anti-Catholics hide behind the rules. I don’t lie. The Catholics here don’t lie. The anti-Catholics do. When a lying anti-Catholic is challenged to prove the lie, he or she ALWAYS fails to do so. The lie is often so manifest, and so obviously unprovable, that the liar will simply hide behind the rules and never even attempt to prove the lie.
All of this proves the moral bankruptcy of the Protestant anti-Catholics and their sects. Apparently they do not believe it is morally wrong to lie. That is the only rational explanation.
By the way, as far as I can tell, this post in no way violates not a single rule since it doesn’t “make it personal” about anyone. Now we’ll just see if you leave it up or not.
Hey! Wasn't there a potty language rule or was I hallucinating?
I will rephrase my statement. It was written that
“Why? Because “another Christ” is not like the rest of us. The RCC says the priest is greater than the rest of us, more holy, closer to God, and therefore entitled to whatever pleasurable larks he might feel the need to experience.”
Please cite any Catholic teaching that verifies the above statement. Please show where the Church says priests are entitled to whatever pleasurable larks he might feel the need to experience. I am not accusing you of lying as that is not tolerated but I believe perhaps you have gotten a hold of an unauthorized catechism or maybe even a fraudelent one. I know in the interest of ecuenemical dialogue you would want to reject any suspect sources.