I already know the rules. That doesn’t make a lie any less of a lie. The simple fact is that anti-Catholics hide behind the rules. I don’t lie. The Catholics here don’t lie. The anti-Catholics do. When a lying anti-Catholic is challenged to prove the lie, he or she ALWAYS fails to do so. The lie is often so manifest, and so obviously unprovable, that the liar will simply hide behind the rules and never even attempt to prove the lie.
All of this proves the moral bankruptcy of the Protestant anti-Catholics and their sects. Apparently they do not believe it is morally wrong to lie. That is the only rational explanation.
By the way, as far as I can tell, this post in no way violates not a single rule since it doesn’t “make it personal” about anyone. Now we’ll just see if you leave it up or not.
For instance, you might say a deity, religious authority, author, sect or group lies. But if you say another Freeper is a liar or has told a lie, then that is making it personal.
Because there are so many other word choices ("false" "wrong" "error" "misinformed", etc.) - there is NO justification whatsoever for using that word in reference to another Freeper, personally. It attributes motive, the intent to deceive - it is mind reading and therefore inflammatory.