Posted on 07/22/2010 5:57:02 AM PDT by NYer
A couple of years ago, a Pastor asked me to provide a catechetical training day for teachers in his Catholic school and CCD program. One of my first questions to him was what issues had developed requiring my assistance. The Pastor voiced to me his concern over poor doctrinal formation he suspected the children were receiving. I asked him how he finally came to this point. He said; “I knew things were off when all I saw was glue, crayons, construction paper and scissors during an eighth grade religion class.” Right there and then I realized what I had to work with.
The inevitable day arrives. As the catechists walked into the parish center, we began with prayer and introductions. I typically begin with a short story reflecting on the catechetical formation for the day. This process helps to gauge the audience and determine when to run when they have had enough. Kidding aside, the first segment involved preparing them for the day, the aim of the 
instruction, purpose, goals, desires and application for the classroom. A good strategy when teaching teachers is not to patronize them. They are teachers and know everything. I know I am one of them. In reality, the heart of instruction here lies with an authentic witness of the living Gospel of Jesus Christ in a gradual loving way.
Knowing that many teachers resort to arts and crafts because of a genuine fear and ignorance in teaching the Catholic faith to students I began the training by asking the catechists for the one thing they would like to know about the faith they still had questions on. After a subtle pause (pretty typical) hands were drawn. The questions asked centered on sin, true presence of Christ in the Eucharist, confession, purgatory, mass participation, is the Church biblical, Mary, how to read the bible, other religions etc. My next question to them was why they wanted to know about these particular doctrines. Their response was nothing short of amazing. They did not know how these particular teachings came to be! Keep in mind, these catechists are supposedly teaching children the Catholic faith. Right there and then I realized we needed to start at the very beginning e.g. Do you believe in God the Father the almighty?
If the teacher does not have a sound understanding of how their life reflects the Gospel let alone living within the Story of salvation, then how are they going to impart the story onto their students? Hence, the focal point of the problem we face in the catechetical field. Our catechists lack basic doctrinal formation. I charted a different course of action realizing that this group needed a systematic engaging approach to learn and apply Catholic doctrine in the classroom.
The result was a mini-RCIA course where I went through Salvation History and presented to them their role in light of Jesus Christ the Divine Teacher (Heb 11:6). In other words, they needed to see how the Church came to be, their role within the Church and the graces given to us by Christ at Baptism to continue His work in the Church He founded. A basic outline of the curriculum for this training session looked something like this:
It was important the catechists saw the biblical basis for these doctrinal pillars. In addition, how the Catechism references the teachings of the Church through the footnotes. A short primer on how to use the Catechism of the Catholic Church and view the references, cross-references, and articles numbers to find a particular teaching gave the catechists a better grasp of the information.
This experience is common. A generation of uncatechized faithful over the past thirty-years has drifted throughout their Catholic life not knowing the graces they received through their Baptism. The recitation of our Baptismal promises appears as an afterthought to many. When asked within the Rite of Baptism, Do you reject, sin, and all his empty works, and all his empty promises . . . it begs to ask the question to these teachers whether they truly understand what sin is in order to reject it.
When I posed this very question to one of the teachers in the training session, the response was a common one. Why do we need to concentrate on sin, it is more important to focus on the works of Jesus? Do you see where this particular catechist has quietly misaligned the purpose of Christ and His Church. Whether its ignorance, issues with the doctrine of sin, or a personal experience initiating this response, the opportunity to discuss the nature of sin was difficult. Now, we must be careful when discussing the doctrine of sin from this pastoral perspective; we do not know what the person has gone through personally where a certain sinful act may have caused negative, spiritual harm or drawn out a bad experience. It is vital that a catechist be carefully aware of the audience they are instructing. However, we cannot shy away from addressing the dangers of sin itself.
Another teacher, noting her frustration in sitting through a dreadful class in her opinion said these magic words: “You can keep your catechism, how do you expect me to apply it in the classroom?” Moreover, there you go, this brave soul echoed the sentiments of others who had resisted on using the catechism in the classroom. This “shot heard around the classroom,” reflected the genuine mentality of many teachers viewing the catechism as a useless tool because it probably did not provide cutouts for the kids to “draw” and “cut-out.” This comment troubled me because of an apparent ignorance towards the application or appreciation of the Catechism. There is fruit to the argument that it is not the teachers fault. From one perspective, this may be true; nonetheless, it does not negate the fact of what we are dealing with now. St. Augustine-the Father of Catechetics describes catechizing the ignorant in this way:
“The best method for instructing ignorant men in Christian doctrine, one that will bear much fruit is to ask questions in a friendly fashion after the explanation; from this questioning one can learn whether each one understood what he heard or whether the explanation needs repeating. In order that the learner grasp the matter, we must ascertain by questioning whether the one being catechized has understood, and in accordance with his response, we must either explain more clearly and fully or not dwell further on what is known to them etc. But if a man is very slow, he must be mercifully helped and the most necessary doctrines especially should be briefly imparted to him.”
As the Catechist trainer in this situation, you cannot scold nor demean these individuals. In many ways, ignorance is rooted in their responses due to a lack of formation. Thus, a gentle but firm disposition serves us well in this type of situation because we do not want to lose them. Our hope rests in a genuine conversion for these teachers (1 Pt 3:15). The “you can keep your catechism” statement by the teacher mentioned earlier should not detract anyone from teaching the faith. My call for this person was to help her find God. An opportunity arose to present the Gospel, reveal the importance of Christ in our lives and provide her with an open opportunity to seek Him.
It is very important that the catechist reveal the relevance of doctrine in the lives of the faithful. Our faith is naturally explicit (1 Thess 2:13) because God has made Himself visible through His Church. Man naturally seeks what is visible and revealed. For instance, when we are able to observe and recognize a moral act the exercise of the doctrinal action takes effect on our senses. We are able to witness doctrine exercised. The liturgy – a public work, provides a visible reality of the existence of faith and the exercise of doctrine.
By the end of the day, the teachers who survived my training session realized in a small way the necessity of teaching doctrine to children. The success of the day came not by how much doctrine I could expose them to, it was helping them realize how little they knew about the faith and what to do about. Not only for their souls but also for the souls of the children they teach.
The religion instructor must be prepared to proclaim the truth of the Catholic Church. His/her responsibility is to aid the development of the person they are instructing by explaining Church teaching carefully and appropriately through a careful transmission rooted in Sacred Tradition, Sacred Scripture and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. The door to the nourishing a soul in Catholic doctrine must be convincing so the person applies these doctrines to everyday life. The need for the Catechism of the Catholic Church is more relevant than ever if we genuinely desire to impart the Catholic faith. Our duty and responsibility is to answer the questions our students have. Clarity of truth is primary in our instruction.
Just follow the comments of St. Francis of Assisi, "Preach the Gospel at all times, and if necessary, use words."
The best witness you can give is living the Gospel in your own life.
Heck, I was even able to follow the Mass in Japanese! I had to ask my daughter what the priest was saying during his homily, though. ;o)
For his conversion. Is he signed up for the RCIA or Catholics Can Come Home classes?
Those look great! Thanks. I’m going to send it to our DRE.
WOW!!!!
The friend with whose family we were staying, went with us to Mass, because she was the only one who could navigate the Metro, and find the Church, which was off the main road. She asked me how I could tell what was going on, since I don’t speak Japanese. I told her the Mass was the same, all over the world, even if it is in the native language of the country in which it’s celebrated.
I agree with netmilsmom. The Seton religion series is excellent and extremely orthodox. The DRE at my older son’s former Catholic school (he just graduated) would literally give birth to a kitten if she was asked to use it.
My younger son is home schooled now, and we use Seton. Very impressive, and VERY Catholic.
Good luck,
Regards,
In our church and Scout troops, it seems like people are volunteering because they know it has to be done. Even if RE teachers don’t really know the Faith themselves, they use the materials and present it to the kids. I think you get a better result if you really know what you’re teaching at a deep level, but just putting out what’s in the curriculum is reasonably solid.
You do have to do some crafts and coloring with 6- to 8-year-old kids. There’s only so much lecture they can take, especially if they’ve been in school all day.
My mom was in early childhood education for years -- her usual pick-me-up for the kids was 'music and movement' -- playing round games, dancing, and singing. Everybody loved dancing with the parachute, but you have to go out to the playground to do that. Mom used an old Army surplus cargo chute . . . but I see it's gone all commercial now.
If we sat down and thought about it I bet we could come up with some good round games for Religious Ed.
I’ll be teaching 1st grade again this fall. Any suggestions for round games?
Good for you! The parents will probably squawk and complain but you definitely took the right approach. It takes a greatr deal of personal sacrifice to commit oneself to teaching religious education. Kudos, Suzi, for sharing the gift of yourself with these kids.
My old parish priest was transferred in May to become a convenor for three churches.
The first homily my new priest gave started with this line.
"In the musical production of Gigi, a young girl was preparing to attend her coming out party and the song they used to illustrate her fear was, Offer a Prayer for me."
Since that time I have been making the 35 minute trip every Saturday to attend my old priests new parish.
It is now my new parish.
Speaking of “volunteers”. What is the deal? If we can not celebrate the Holy Mass properly, what are the chances for CCD. The GIRM states the conditions for even using extraordinary ministers for Holy Communion. (Getting out by noon is not one of them.) In the acceptable but rare use of extraordinaries, the GIRM states the order of selection. I believe this order is correct: priest, deacon, acolyte, sister, parish men, parish women, but assuredly the parish women are last. The duty of the priest is to do the selecting respecting this order, but NOT to simply accept volunteers with a wave of the hand. I look around and see the numbers of men sitting through the Mass who are receiving from women.
Let me check my books. I remember one about Daniel in the lion’s den. “The old cow died” is NOT suitable for Religious Ed., although it’s fun to imitate a buzzard (at least we thought so).
I would throw in Bastiat’s The Law.
CATHOLIC CAUCUS Ping List ping.
(Please send me a PM if you would like to be added to or removed from this new CATHOLIC CAUCUS Ping List. This list will be used primarily for pings to CATHOLIC CAUCUS Religion Forum threads, but also on occasion for other threads of interest for orthodox Catholics.)
I think you’re correct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.