Posted on 05/08/2010 8:33:35 AM PDT by GonzoII
By Bishop John C. Wester Take the survey: Do you support Arizona's new immigration law? Let us know» Editor’s note: In light of the recent debate over Arizona’s new immigration law and responses to Archbishop Jose H. Gomez’s essay “Archbishop: Catholics’ role in immigration reform solution” in our May 2 issue, Our Sunday Visitor asked Bishop John C. Wester of Salt Lake City, chairman of the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Migration, to answer some of our readers’ toughest questions about the Church’s position on immigration. Question: What don’t the bishops understand about “illegal”? Why disrespect the rule of law? Answer: The U.S. bishops and the teachings of the Catholic Church have consistently respected the right of the sovereign to control its borders, as well as the rule of civil law. However, the Church, along with other members of our democratic society, has the right to work to change laws which are believed to violate basic human dignity, dignity imbued by the Creator. In the case of immigration, the U.S. bishops believe that the broken U.S. immigration system contributes to the exploitation of migrant workers in the workplace; their abuse by ruthless smugglers; and their deaths in the desert as they seek to find work to support their families. They come illegally because there are insufficient visas under the current system to come legally. Our system contains only 5,000 permanent visas for unskilled laborers to come to the United States, but the demand for their work is much higher, since as many as 300,000 undocumented people each year are absorbed into the U.S. workforce. Comprehensive immigration reform, which the U.S. bishops support, would replace illegality with a system based on legal presence and legal entry, thus restoring the rule of law to a chaotic system while also protecting the basic dignity, and lives, of our fellow brothers and sisters. It would require those who have broken the law to get on the right side of it by paying a fine, taxes, learning English and waiting in the back of a long line to have a chance to become a U.S. citizen. This “path to citizenship” is in the best interests of migrants, who are able to become full members of their communities, and our nation, which will continue to benefit from their contributions without sacrificing our long-held values as a nation of immigrants: freedom, fairness and opportunity. Question: Is this welcoming of Latinos because they are Catholic? If not, do you also support opening our borders to impoverished people from Arab and Asian countries? Answer: The support of the U.S. bishops for immigration reform is not because the majority of immigrants at this point in our history are Latino or Catholic. The Catholic Church heeds Our Lord’s call to “welcome the stranger” to all children of God, regardless of their ethnicity, national origin, race or religion. This is evident in all of the social-service programs of the Catholic Church, which base their outreach on “need,” not “creed.” Having said that, the fact that the majority of immigrants are Catholic makes it more real for many Catholics, since many immigrants are present in our service programs, health care centers, schools and parishes. We, as a Catholic community, directly witness the human consequences of a broken system each day, when immigrant families come to pastors and employees and ask for help for a family member who has been detained or deported by immigration authorities. We can only help these families, and keep them together, by changing our immigration laws. Finally, despite assertions to the contrary, the U.S. bishops do not support “open borders,” but support generous, but reasonable, immigration policies that serve the common good. Question: The current situation of illegal immigration is causing an unsustainable strain on social services. Do the bishops not see that as a problem? Answer: There are several myths in this area. First of all, most studies show that, although at an early age immigrants consume more than they contribute, over a lifetime they are net contributors to our economy through the taxes they pay, the goods they produce and consume, and their labor. Moreover, legal immigrants do not qualify for welfare or health care for the first five years of their residency in the United States, while undocumented immigrants never qualify for such benefits. In fact, undocumented immigrants pay billions in income taxes each year and at least $7 billion in Social Security taxes, helping to sustain Social Security for the baby-boomer generation. By adopting comprehensive immigration reform and providing the undocumented legal status, the United States would receive even more income taxes and Social Security payments from immigrants, since they would be required to register with the government and pay their full share. Question: Why should not the priority be on the development in the countries the immigrants come from so they do not want to come here in the first place? Answer: In fact, the U.S. bishops have stated that Congress should look at the “push factors,” such as the lack of living-wage employment, that compel immigrants to leave their home countries and risk their lives to come to the United States in search of jobs. As a global institution, the Catholic Church believes that the most humane and effective long-term solution to irregular immigration is economic development in poorer countries, so that people can stay in their home countries and support their families in dignity. In the context of the current immigration debate, this is the Church’s answer to a border wall, which will not prevent irregular migration over the long term. The Church believes that migration should ultimately be driven by choice, not necessity. Question: What kind of immigration reform do the bishops want exactly? Amnesty? Open borders? Answer: Neither. The U.S. bishops’ prescription for mending our broken system is to bring the 11 million undocumented out of the shadows, register them with the government, require them to pay a fine and any taxes owed, and require them to learn English and work as they wait in the back of the line for a chance for citizenship. This is not “amnesty,” which is generally defined as granting a benefit without anything in return. The U.S. bishops would also support an increase in family-based and employment-based visas so that immigrant families could migrate to the United States in a safe, legal and controlled manner, and not be subject to the abuse of human smugglers or to death in the desert. It is our view that making changes to the legal immigration system will help ease pressure on our border by taking undocumented immigrants out of the enforcement equation, freeing up law enforcement to focus upon those who are here to harm us — drug smugglers, human traffickers, and would-be terrorists — and not those simply looking for a job. We also believe, as mentioned earlier, that Congress should examine how the root causes of migration can be addressed, so that migrants can stay where they are and work in dignity. Bishop John C. Wester heads the Diocese of Salt Lake City and is chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Migration.Bishop answers readers' tough questions about immigration
U.S. bishops advocate mending broken system and improving economic development in poor countries
The demand for illegal workers will not change if amnesty is given to those that are illegal now. The reason employers hire illegals is cheap wages, few if any benefits, and they will tolerate unsafe or otherwise undesirable working conditions better than legal workers. If we gave all illegals citizenship tomorrow- the new citizen workers would not work for low wages, etc and would move to better jobs. Their employers would be looking for a new crop of illegals to exploit. That is why amnesty is not a solution.
LOVE IT.
Hope the little needles etc. are going well, at least better.
LUB AND YORKIE, TOO.
I tend to agree with you.
Readin' The Good Book on your own again, ya bluddy heretic? It's bread and water in a Papal Jail for you, me bucko. And you'll be thankin' your Lucky Charms The Inquisition has softened up lately.
For your Penance, say 14 Hail Mary's and 24 Our Fathers in Spanish. Go now, and sin no more, my son. And don't let me hear of you listening to that wicked Eyetalian heretic, Father Bascio .. or lookin'him up on that internet thing, neither!
” 1”I tell you the truth, the man who does not enter the sheep pen by the gate, but climbs in by some other way, is a thief and a robber.”
John 10:1 NIV
Thank you. Perfect!
AMEN, BROTHER !!
SORRY, NO AMNESTY.
Here is MY tough question for them:
“Why stop at amnesty for 11,000,000 illegal immigrants? Aren’t there hundreds of millions who want to find work and earn a ‘living wage’? Why not bring them ALL in to America? Or why not have America pay them all a ‘living wage’ to stay out? Surely a country that borrowed 1,400 BILLION this year alone could borrow 5,000 BILLION from somewhere?
or,
Why does the Catholic Church support MEXICAN illegal immigration? Isn’t it aware that Filipinos and poor people all over the world want to come? Couldn’t it, as a ‘global organization’ sponsor ships to bring in millions of Filipinos and Chinese so that THEY could also earn a ‘living wage’? Why should Mexicans get in free, while others wait?
Your second question won’t work. Catholic prelates are just as supportive of illegals from EVERYWHERE as they are from Mexico.
Thank you.
Some friends of mine who are serious Catholics say it's the Free Masons within the Church that want these illegals enrolled as pro-abortion voters.
Thus will forfeit their souls in exchange for the free .gov cheese.
Every Mason I know is totally anti-abortion and pro life ... to the Max!
So what's going on?
Good insight. But I take it further. I'm tired of politicians and priests who impact the rest of the country with negativity. Servants? Servants of Satan if you ask me.
It is the first cogent and kind explanation I have heard or read that expresses my position. He does it without the least tinge of superiority or anger and yet is able to say immigration,illegal and perhaps even legal,is immoral as well as unjust. He is not a smooth talker but he makes his points. If you have ten minutes I hope you will find it,read it and let me know what you think. Thanks.
I’ve seen the video and it is very good.
I respectfully disagree with that premise, and when a man ofthe cloth makes lame, transparent arguments to the contrary, I categorize him as my enemy.
It's pretty simple.
Mexico is run by a marxist kakistocracy, with a long and foul history of persecuting the Catholic Church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.