Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg
But Dr. Eckleburg, the apologists tell me they were TEENAGE boys like the ones in the picture. That it was homosexual sex not child rape. I don't understand...

Rev. Lawrence Murphy, rear left with hands folded, watches as Holy Communion is administered at St. John's School for the Deaf in St. Francis, Wis. A Minnesota attorney said Thursday, April 22, 2010, he is filing a federal lawsuit that accuses Pope Benedict XVI and senior Vatican officials of failing to defrock Murphy despite allegations he molested at least 200 deaf children from 1950 to 1975.
35 posted on 04/22/2010 7:21:26 PM PDT by TSgt (We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TSgt

***That it was homosexual sex not child rape.***

That it was homosexual child rape not sex.

There, fixed it for you, you had just a couple of words out of order.


43 posted on 04/22/2010 7:25:36 PM PDT by Gamecock (If you want Your Best Life Now, follow Osteen. If you want your best life forever, don't. JM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: TSgt
Any foolish excuse will do to try and deflect the truth.

This is not just a homosexual abuse scandal. It is first and foremost a pederast abuse scandal.

The age of consent for sexual activity in every state in the union is 16 and above.

That means every one of these priests who sexually assaulted 15-, 14-, 13-, 12-, 11-, 10, 9-, 8-, and 7-year-olds all committed statutory rape on these children.

46 posted on 04/22/2010 7:26:51 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson