Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Unam Sanctam

And in the case of some of these words, there may not be a convenient anglosaxon equivalent. In some ways this is specialty language.


8 posted on 10/24/2009 5:44:06 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marron

For heaven sakes, how did the pre-Vatican II parishioners ever get by having to deal with words they might not understand, like when the whole Mass was in Latin. Get a life, Bishop, or instruct your flock as to the meaning of the words they are all too stupid to understand. Geez....


13 posted on 10/24/2009 6:04:35 PM PDT by flaglady47 (In Unity There Is Strength.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: marron

>>And in the case of some of these words, there may not be a convenient anglosaxon equivalent. In some ways this is specialty language.<<

There is no words for “yes” or “no” in Latin.


23 posted on 10/24/2009 6:38:45 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: marron

Not to be impertinent, but if you can find a 1928 Anglican Book of Common Prayer (American version), you will find language that is heavily anglo-saxon and very orthodox. We were hoping the new Missal would simply copy what we already had, but not so much apparently.


45 posted on 10/24/2009 8:18:12 PM PDT by BelegStrongbow (I'm still waiting for Dear Leader to say something that isn't a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson