of (1) the text of the King James Version; (2) cross-references to latter-day scriptures—Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, Pearl of Great Price;
______________________________________________
But But But But
I thought the bom was a whole “another testament”
as in all new words/scriptures/info that had never been read or seen before...
CROSS-REFERENCES ???????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
Never fear...a BYU professor is the editor for a new edition of the Old Testament....wonder if it will be cross-referenced to the BOM. ;)
I think the LDS church should stick with its clarification as to why so many changes in the BOM, if it was translated correctly in the beginning (three different accounts on how the BOM was written/translated) ... it had to be “revised” many times in order to take care of spelling or grammar corrections. The original text betrays its New England origin in many ways, from inconsistent spelling to incorrect use of tenses and number, as well as incorrect usage of Jacobean English. Then of course not counting incorporating known mistakes (subsequently corrected) in the Bible into the BOM ...