Here is the relevant section:
Live A Chaste And Virtuous Life |
Live a Chaste and Virtuous Life Inappropriate gender-based behavior
Pornography and indecent material Computer pornography Sexual and similar misconduct
Any level of sexual or similar misconduct at BYU is significant and may lead to a separation from the university. Homosexual behavior or advocacy One's stated same-gender attraction is not an Honor Code issue. However, the Honor Code requires all members of the university community to manifest a strict commitment to the law of chastity. Homosexual behavior and/or advocacy of homosexual behavior are inappropriate and violate the Honor Code. Homosexual behavior includes not only sexual relations between members of the same sex, but all forms of physical intimacy that give expression to homosexual feelings. Advocacy includes seeking to influence others to engage in homosexual behavior or promoting homosexual relations as being morally acceptable. Violations of the Honor Code may result in actions up to and including separation from the University. _______________________________________________ Just as illegal immigrants should not be rewarded for sneaking into this country, those who knowingly violate their commitments, both legal and moral, in an attempt to ridicule and impugn their former beliefs should not be rewarded for doing so either. Not to mention the fact that BYU is a private institution and is therefore well within its rights not to grant this kid a degree. If you don't like BYU's beliefs, don't sign the code and go somewhere else. It really is simple enough for even Libs (and opportunistic critics of the church) to understand. |
I didn’t see where they were forbidden to take their shirts off.
"I may not be able to define pornography humor, but I know it a bad joke when I see hear it."
The question is not whether the code should stand, but in this particular case it's application and how this was handled. It is in the timing that things are suspicious.
It is also where BYU may have caught it's foot in the door and set a precedent that may bring other ramifications down the road.
For example, since the young man earned the credits and indeed was allowed to walk, will the next move be to rescind degrees awarded of individuals who left the church a few years after graduation? More realistically could they do such if the infraction was discovered well after the student graduated and would that be wise? On first blush all that sounds ridiculous, but in essence that is what they have done in this case. The young man was finished before they expelled him.
They are on a fine line. They should have made their move when he was initially excommunicated, before he finished that last class.
And which of the a-i and/or a-f items was he GUILTY of??
It’s like Saudi enforcement of Sharia Law.