Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prelate Urges US Catholics to United Voice
ZNA ^ | January 22, 2009

Posted on 01/22/2009 4:15:12 PM PST by NYer

DENVER, Colorado, JAN. 22, 2009 (Zenit.org).- Archbishop Charles Chaput exhorted Catholics across the United States to "let your voice supporting life be heard," in the ear of the new political administration.

The archbishop of Denver asserted this in an article published Wednesday in the Denver Catholic Register.

He began by affirming the obligation of Christians to "love their country, build on its greatest qualities and serve its best ideals."

The prelate spoke about the duty to pray for our leaders and obey the law, "insofar as the law does not violate human dignity in some systematic, gravely evil way."

He added, "When bad laws and court decisions cripple the soul of a society, Christians must work to change them as a matter both of justice and charity. Otherwise we risk colluding in the evil of their outcome.

"Obviously with families to raise, jobs to pursue and lives to live, not all Christians can be engaged in the many important issues facing our country. But we can always at least serve the truth by not lying to ourselves and to each other."

Obama

Archbishop Chaput referred to the inauguration of U.S. President Barack Obama on Tuesday, noting that "he was elected on a message of national renewal, unity and hope."

He continued: "These are worthy goals, and we should wholeheartedly support his administration in all these things. His inauguration marks a tremendous victory for racial justice in our country [...].

"Barack Obama's rise to the presidency reminds us that among the family of nations, the United States remains very unusual: It is still a place where people can succeed on their ability; where politics can actually matter; and where evil structures and laws can be changed by sustained, peaceful witness."

36 years ago

The archbishop turned his focus to today's anniversary of "one of the most destructive Supreme Court decisions in American history, Roe vs. Wade."

"By legalizing permissive abortion and drastically limiting voters' ability to restrict it in any way," he explained, "Roe set the foundations for an abortion industry that has wounded countless women and resulted in the killing of more than 40 million unborn children."

The prelate pointed out that "President Obama's past record of support for abortion 'rights,' embryonic stem cell research and other violations of human dignity is deeply troubling, and also deeply ironic, given his sensitivity to other human rights."

He underlined the fact that "before and during the recent election, then-Senator Obama pledged his support for a Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) that would strike down all state restrictions on abortion and sweep away the many modest but important gains made by the pro-life movement over the past three decades."

The archbishop acknowledged that the president's Catholic supporters "claim that a pro-FOCA effort is unlikely in the coming congressional session, and that the Obama administration may take a go-slow approach to the abortion issue."

He asserted: "We can hope this is true. But of course, the form and timing of FOCA-like efforts are irrelevant.

"It's the political intent behind them that matters. We have to work with what we know to be true by the president's own words.

"The Obama administration was elected on the economy, but along with President Obama's economic mandate comes his forcefully abortion 'rights' public record and party platform. Nothing in the president's words or actions has suggested a change in his fundamental goals."

Speaking up

Archbishop Chaput explained that Catholics in the United States, including those in the Archdiocese of Denver, will have the chance "to sign a petition to our elected officials opposing FOCA and asking them to respect the dignity of unborn human life."

He underlined that: "Whether FOCA actually materializes in the coming session of Congress is not finally important; the message we send is.

"In fact, with the current Congress and administration, the abortion lobby could accomplish its destructive agenda quite easily by incremental legislative and executive steps that would have a much lower profile than a 'Freedom of Choice Act,' but the same bloody effect."

"We're in a new moment for our country," said the prelate, "a moment that offers great promise, but also requires great vigilance and sustained action to defend the dignity of human life at its earliest and most vulnerable stage."

He exhorted his readers: "When you're asked to sign the U.S. bishops' petition opposing FOCA in your parish, please sign it enthusiastically and encourage others to do the same.

"This is an issue -- protecting unborn human life -- that transcends party affiliation and needs all of us as believers to speak clearly with one voice."


TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; archbishopchaput; chaput; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Jim-FREEportPA
U.S. Bishops Cut All Funding to ACORN, Activities Funded Hard to Determine
Bishop discusses reasons behind cutoff of ACORN funding
Catholic Church drops ACORN funding

21 posted on 01/22/2009 8:44:51 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
I guess you missed this article posted on American Papist before the election where bishops spoke out saying the LIFE was the primary issue. Glad I kept the article!

Over 100 Bishops Have Spoken Out on Priority of Life Issues
Posted on October 28, 2008, 11:59 AM | Deal W. Hudson
The list of U. S. bishops who have spoken out on the priority of the life issues in this election is now over 100. The list now contains 70 individual bishops and three joint statements.
I would like to continue updating this list until the day of the election. I have tried to incorporate all the comments thus far. If I dd not get them all, I apologize. (For a few of the suggestions, I could not find a suitable link.)
Please continue using the comments section to let us know what bishop is not on this list who should be. This would include any bishop who has individually, or jointly, published a statement about this election pointing out the primacy of the life issues.
Thank you for your help.
1. Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver
2. Bishop James Conley, auxiliary of Denver
3. Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C.
4. Justin Cardinal Rigali of Philadelphia, chairman of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities
5. Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport, chairman of the Committee on Doctrine
6. Edward Cardinal Egan of New York
7. Bishop Samuel Aquila of Fargo
8. Bishop David Zubik of Pittsburgh
9. Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs
10. Archbishop Jose Gomez of San Antonio
11. Bishop Oscar Cantu, auxiliary of San Antonio
12. Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Centre
13. Bishop Edward Slattery of Tulsa
14. Bishop Kevin Farrell of Dallas
15. Bishop Gregory Aymond of Austin
16. Sean Cardinal O'Malley of Boston
17. Bishop Thomas Wenski of Orlando
18. Archbishop John Nienstedt of Saint Paul/Minneapolis
19. Francis Cardinal George of Chicago, President of the USCCB
20. Bishop Robert Vasa of Baker
21. Bishop Jerome Listecki of La Crosse
22. Bishop Richard Lennon of Cleveland
23. Bishop Ralph Nickless of Sioux City
24. Archbishop George Niederauer of San Francisco
25. Bishop Glen Provost of Lake Charles, LA
26. Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio of Brooklyn
27. Bishop Joseph F. Martino of Scranton
28. Archbishop Raymond Burke, Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura
30. Bishop Peter J. Jugis of Charlotte
31. Bishop Michael F. Burbidge of Raleigh
32. Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City, KS
33. Bishop Robert Finn of Kansas City-St. Joseph, MO
34. Bishop Robert C. Morlino of Madison, WS
35. Bishop Ronald
Gilmore of Dodge City, KS
36. Bishop Paul
Coakley of Salina, KS
37. Bishop Michael
Jackels of Wichita
38. Bishop Gerald M.
Barbarito of Palm Beach
39. Bishop Kevin W.
Vann of Fort Worth
40. Bishop Rene H. Gracida, retired, of Corpus Christi
41. Daniel Cardinal DiNardo of Houston
42. Bishop Paul S. Loverde of Arlington
43. Bishop Francis X. DiLorenzo of Richmond
44. Bishop William Murphy of Rockville Center
45. Bishop Robert McManus of Worcester
46. Bishop Arthur Serratelli of Patterson
47. Bishop Robert Herrmann of St. Louis
48. Archbishop Edwin O'Brien of Baltimore
49. Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted of Phoenix
50. Bishop Thomas D. Doran of Rockford
51. Bishop Joseph A. Galante of Camden
52. Bishop Robert J. Baker of Birmingham
53. Archbishop Alexander J. Brunett of Seattle
54. Bishop J. Peter Sartain of Joliet
55. Bishop John M. Smith of Trenton
56. Bishop Earl Boyea of Lansing
57. Bishop Leonard R. Blair of Toledo
58. Bishop Frances J. Dewane of Venice
59. Bishop W. Frances Malooly of Wilmington
60. Bishop Robert Morlino of Madison
61. Bishop John Yanta , retired, of Amarillo
62. Bishop James V. Johnston of Springfield-Cape Girardeau
63. Archbishop John Vlazny of Portland
64. Bishop Blase J. Cupich of Rapid City
65. Bishop Lawrence Brandt of Greensburg
66. Bishop Dennis M. Schnurr of Cincinatti
67. Bishop Larry Silva of Honolulu
68. Bishop Paul Swain of Sioux Falls
69. Bishop Michael J. Sheehan of Santa Fe
70. Bishop Eusebius Beltran of Oklahoma City
71. Bishop Kevin C. Rhoades of Harrisburg
72-94. Joint Statement by the bishops of New York State (22 bishops)
95-111. Joint Statement by the bishops of Pennsylvania (16 bishops)
112-116. Joint Statement by the bishops of Kansas (4 bishops)
117-126. Joint Statement by the bishops of Florida (9 bishops)
Added by me
 
127. Bishop Tobin -- http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=30333 ^
 
128. Archbishop Wilton Gregory  georgiabulletin.org ...
 
 
130. Archbishop Elden Curtiss Omaha http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2123119/posts?page=1
 
131. Bishop Carlson's of Michigan pastoral letter in full, go to:
http://www.saginaw.org/images/election-statement_carlson_102...

 

22 posted on 01/22/2009 8:47:55 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Do not use potty language - or references to potty language - on the Religion Forum.


23 posted on 01/22/2009 8:49:24 PM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Well, the message isn’t getting through. How’s that working out?
When they get results then you can talk. For forty years they’ve had a muddled message (remember the “seamless garment”? and now they won’t publicly excommunicate the politicians who facilitate the murder of the unborn.
I see Rigali is chair of the Pro-life committee. I’m thinking that gets him photo ops with pro-life pols in PA, like Casey, just as he had with pro-life pols in MO, like Gephardt.>s


24 posted on 01/23/2009 3:52:29 AM PST by steve8714 (How do you know your tattoo doesn't read "I love mangina."?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Render Unto Caesar: Serving the Nation by Living our Catholic Beliefs in Political Life by Charles J. Chaput
25 posted on 01/23/2009 5:10:43 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
So what was that number of Catholic voters who pulled the lever for 0? Like 57%?
26 posted on 01/23/2009 5:12:01 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Chevron 7 will not engage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

You see the dark cloud. I see the silver lining.

If it had been 43% of voters, nothing would be said. Now they are waking up.

Which other organized religion is being this vocal. Hard pressed to find any.


27 posted on 01/23/2009 5:47:33 AM PST by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Other than helping prepare a speech that was given in front of several Bishops at a private audience this morning on this very subject...not much.

“Wow, 38 million dead babies and they are going to sign a petition”

More paper. I thought that’s what you were complaining about.


28 posted on 01/23/2009 6:55:38 AM PST by Radl (rtr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

Sorry but I see a bunch off fools to busy to reasearch candidate(s) and see if they compatible with their believes. With 0 it would of taken one minute. Pro-choice or Pro-life? Easy


29 posted on 01/23/2009 7:16:06 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Chevron 7 will not engage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$; netmilsmom
Sorry but I see a bunch off fools to busy to reasearch candidate(s) and see if they compatible with their believes.

In frustration, it is easy to swing at the closest object but that will accomplish nothing. How many Jews voted for Obama? How many Evangelicals? What percentage of the US population voted for him? Ad freeper netmilsmom commented, it is the Catholic hierarchy that are holding Obama responsible for his actions, beginning with the pope.

30 posted on 01/23/2009 7:58:15 AM PST by NYer ("Run from places of sin as from a plague." - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Here is 75% of the Jewish vote.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2169768/posts

And my question still stands. Which other churches are at least speaking out about this?

I truly believe that the Bishops were blindsided by the Catholic vote. Some of them have absolutely NO clue of what is going on in these parishes. Their eyes have been opened. Who was the Bishop that came into the meeting and freaked about the justification of voting for Obama?

The problem is that when a parish is quiet, no one looks at them. Yet, the quiet ones are the dangerous ones. These Bishops didn’t have kids. We moms know that quiet is not good. Now they see that the quiet ones are the most dangerous.


31 posted on 01/23/2009 8:56:01 AM PST by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Don’t get me going on the liberal Jewish thing...


32 posted on 01/23/2009 9:38:10 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Chevron 7 will not engage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I probably shouldn’t post this, and I’m probably all wrong, but I have to wonder if the first place we have to start is by reforming from within first. My parish, like many others I’m sure is choca block full of cafeteria types who voted for Obama and having to attend services and watch them receive the sacraments each Sunday is simply painful. Someday, somewhere, the body of Christ is going to have to draw a line in the sand or our light will waiver and ultimately blink out altogether a la the Episcopalians. I don’t think this thing was supposed to be all about “Universal” inclusion.

If we can pare out the tumour from within the body then we can begin the necessary process of consolidation and a re-ordering of our own Catholic society in response to the convulsions of evil from the greater society, but I think that in order to effectuate any meaningful change we’ve got to, as a culture, begin to carve ourselves out of the society as a whole. We don’t wield any meaningful clout except economic clout, but I’m thinking we weild that best to the extent that we’re as independent of the greater evil as possible.


33 posted on 01/23/2009 10:13:10 AM PST by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

THE BODY COUNT FOR SURGICAL ABORTION ALONE IS OVER 50,000,000 .... AND CALIFORNIA DOESN’T EVEN REPORT THIS VITAL STATISTIC.

IT WAS REPORTED ON EWTN’S COVERAGE OF THE MARCH FOR LIFE THAT 60% OF ABORTIONS ARE REPEATS.

JUST IMAGINE WHAT THIS COUNTRY WOULD BE LIKE IF THESE AMERICANS HAD BEEN BORN? WE HAVE CHOSEN TO KILL OFF 50 MILLION PRODUCERES, CONSUMERS AND TAX PAYERS AND THEIR FUTURE CHILDREN!!

“A NATION THAT KILLS ITS CHILDREN IS A NATION WITHOUT HOPE.”
JOHN PAUL II


34 posted on 01/23/2009 6:05:11 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
I am just one poor pre Vatican II Catholic in a sea of modernism. But in a few years my kids will be old enough to respect the Mass. We will be driving an hour on Sundays to attend a Tridentine Mass according to the 1962 Missal.

I can't change the world but I can do my best to set my kids on the right path. In my mind the right path is traditional Roman Catholicism. I know it was not taught in my cathechism and I do not believe it is being taught today. Nonetheless, I shall do what I can to pass it along to another generation.

35 posted on 01/23/2009 9:12:31 PM PST by bradthebuilder (War is peace; Ignorance is strength; Freedom is slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson