Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unmasking the Pope and the Catholic System (Open)
Grace To You ^ | Exact date unknown | John F. MacArthur

Posted on 05/17/2008 6:30:09 PM PDT by e.Shubee

John F. MacArthur is no ordinary evangelical. I think that there is something special about him because of the unusual excellence of his book  The Gospel According to Jesus. I consider that book to be the finest exposition on the gospel ever written.

The most surprising thing about John MacArthur is his wide acceptance, given that he believes in the true gospel and takes a strong stand on the historic Protestant understanding of Roman Catholicism. Consider his protestant message, Unmasking the Pope and the Catholic System, delivered shortly after the death of Pope John Paul II, and see if you can either respect or refute his statements.

http://www.bereanbeacon.org/audio_video/UnmaskingThePope.mp3


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Evangelical Christian; History
KEYWORDS: catholicism; christians; johnmacarthur; pope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 381 next last
To: Fichori

“I have actually seen a number of threads posted by catholics that took an offensive(v. defensive) position towards evangelicals/protestants.”

I have seen it too. It is my opinion that non-Catholic Christians do this more than Catholic Christians. If you think otherwise, fine.

Freegards


261 posted on 05/22/2008 1:01:30 PM PDT by Ransomed (Son of Ransomed says Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed; Fichori
I have seen it too. It is my opinion that non-Catholic Christians do this more than Catholic Christians. If you think otherwise, fine.

I have participated in more of these debates than I can even remember and I can say without hesitation that I have NEVER seen ANY Catholic even suggest that Protestants would be denied Eternal Live in Heaven. However, I have on a great many occasions see Protestants not only suggest this, but actually declare it with regards to Catholics.

262 posted on 05/22/2008 1:05:53 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed
I think you’re wrong, but then I reckon it could be hard to be impartial depending on whose ox is getting poked at.

IMO most people don't take notice of threads in the Religion Forum unless a) it was posted by someone they know, or b) THEIR beliefs are mentioned in the thread title. Case in point - you thought I was a "weird disgruntled Catholic." I'd bet most Catholics on FR never noticed the many threads I posted about the Calvinists, the Baptists, the Dispensationalists, the Mormons, or the Swedenborgites. They're out there - you probably just didn't notice them. Likewise, anti-Protestant hitpieces are posted by Catholics all the time. When they're not goring your sacred cow, you probably don't pay much attention to them.

You'd think that the largest Christian denomination would expect to get the largest amount of news coverage. I got numerous complaints from Catholics when I posted pro-Catholic threads. There's just no pleasing some people.

263 posted on 05/22/2008 1:06:41 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" -- Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: narses
Sorry, this isn’t an issue of being “thin skinned”, it is an issue of outright hatefilled lies pummeling Catholics day after day by posters who do little else. Is this really what the “Free Republic” is all about?

I agree. I truly don't understand the Protestants who insist on attacking the Catholic Church ad nauseam. I wish they would spend their time examining the real threat of radical Islam and the killing of Christians and burning of churches in Muslim countries. Why not fight against a real threat, rather than a perceived difference of opinion among those who accept Jesus Christ as the Way, the Truth and the Light?

264 posted on 05/22/2008 1:07:44 PM PDT by Elvina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
I find it amusing when folks draw parallels between a position they hate and one that is completely not relevant, just to divert attention away from the issue. Calling people who question or refute RCC doctrine that ain’t in Scripture get called “Catholic haters!” frequently. Scripture tells us that telling Truth is a form of true friendship and/or love. Any parent understands this.

Do you agree with MacArthur?

He spends the first 1/3 of the audio saying the pope is the anti-christ. Then, he goes into why his doctrine of faith alone and eternal security is the only true doctrine.

He not only 'hates' sin but 'hates' doctrinal errors! And on and on.

I'd like to see one "pro-Catholic" thread where the source is so provocative.

265 posted on 05/22/2008 1:10:55 PM PDT by DaveMSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Elvina

Many of them see Catholics as the real threat. It’s that simple.


266 posted on 05/22/2008 1:11:29 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
I got numerous complaints from Catholics when I posted pro-Catholic threads.

Suuuure you did.

267 posted on 05/22/2008 1:13:16 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Ransomed
I got numerous complaints from Catholics when I posted pro-Catholic threads.

Links please.

268 posted on 05/22/2008 1:15:27 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
John MacArthur and Daily Koz? Thats an equation, intended or otherwise, that I didn't expect to see.

It's a narrow analogy limited to the topic at hand. ;-)

However, as you know even the most devout among us can be led astray by temptation, sometimes, for example, under the lingering belief that the end justifies the means. Perhaps McArthur, in sincerity believes that a little white lie about catholicism that will lead someone to find what McArthur believes is "biblical truth" and this leads to their salvation, then perhaps this white lie is better than leaving them under the "false doctrines of papism", or something like that. (I am only guessing, and am trying to give the man the benefit of the doubt.)

269 posted on 05/22/2008 1:17:05 PM PDT by Huber (And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. - John 1:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: DaveMSmith

I’ve not listened to the audio. As I’ve told a few RCs on FR, the Bible does reveal the identity of antiChrist - nor does it tell us if antiChrist is a person or an attribute of a particular heresy within the church. (I’m reading this book on the subject right now: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0801066069 to gain a better understanding of it)

To answer you: No, I do not consider the pope to be antiChrist. John tells us “every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.” I disagree with the RCC - and her popes - on many issues but I don’t hear this heresy come forth from her or him.

I respect MacArthur to a degree but am not a big fan of his. I disagree with him on a few issues. I DO agree with him that it’s right to hate doctrinal errors - but only those that can reasonably be shown to depart from Biblical truth - such as the RCC doctrine that Mary was sinless or that she was assumed up in to heaven. These doctrines I hate because they are false.

I’ve see “pro-catholic” threads on FR that have been just as provocative - such is the condition of having the freedom of an “open” thread.


270 posted on 05/22/2008 1:18:38 PM PDT by Manfred the Wonder Dawg (Test ALL things, hold to that which is True.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg

Ooops - typo: “the Bible does reveal the identity of antiChrist” should be “the Bible does NOT reveal the identity of antiChrist”


271 posted on 05/22/2008 1:19:52 PM PDT by Manfred the Wonder Dawg (Test ALL things, hold to that which is True.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"I have participated in more of these debates than I can even remember and I can say without hesitation that I have NEVER seen ANY Catholic even suggest that Protestants would be denied Eternal Live in Heaven. However, I have on a great many occasions see Protestants not only suggest this, but actually declare it with regards to Catholics."

Not my argument.

See post 254
272 posted on 05/22/2008 1:26:37 PM PDT by Fichori (Official Tarbaby of the RF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: pegleg

John MacArthur made biblical based claims.

Your refutation of his claims has no scripture references.

A refutation without references is like saying ‘it so because I said its so.’, and stands entirely on the witness of the speaker.


273 posted on 05/22/2008 1:27:24 PM PDT by Fichori (Official Tarbaby of the RF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
One of the books (I cannot remember which) in Charlesworth's Pseudepigrapha - which are not Scripture, merely ancient manuscripts - declared that the end-times "antiChrist" being (as contrasted to the spirit of antiChrist) - would be able to change his appearance at will except for one feature. The feature was that his eyebrows would meet over the ridge of his nose.

LOLOL!

274 posted on 05/22/2008 1:29:01 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Well Alex, you could be right, and I do know you post many sorts of threads about all differing sorts of Faiths. I think what might have confused me is that sometimes you wouldn’t say what you thought about the threads that you posted. I still think Non-Catholic Christians post more threads about Catholics than Catholic Christians post about non-Catholic Christians.

Freegards


275 posted on 05/22/2008 1:29:08 PM PDT by Ransomed (Son of Ransomed says Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Fichori; Ransomed

My response was to Ransomed, you were copied on it.

However, I will say that I find it difficult to believe that in th two months you could even begin to imagine that you have seen enough of these type threads to determine any sort of ratio.


276 posted on 05/22/2008 1:30:34 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I wasn’t looking for one, sorry.


277 posted on 05/22/2008 1:32:31 PM PDT by Fichori (Official Tarbaby of the RF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yes, there are many times when non-Catholic posters have asserted that Catholics—because they practice the Catholic Faith-—are in danger of going to hell.

That’s a judgment call that belongs to God alone.


278 posted on 05/22/2008 1:35:58 PM PDT by Running On Empty ((The three sorriest words:"It's too late"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
MacArthur never claims that the pope is the Final Antichrist, but that there are many Antichrists, and that by his actions, the pope exhibits some of the marks of an Antichrist.

279 posted on 05/22/2008 1:39:21 PM PDT by Fichori (Official Tarbaby of the RF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Fichori
John MacArthur made biblical based claims. Your refutation of his claims has no scripture references.

See Matthews Gospel, 16th Chapter. Pay particular attention to verse 18.

Until you can document the existence of your Church and it’s doctrinal distinctive’s from the day of Pentecost to the present, you have no valid claim against the divinely established, authoritative and visible One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

Until such time, I’ll leave you to your research.

280 posted on 05/22/2008 1:40:23 PM PDT by pegleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 381 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson